Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06867510

Preoperative Block for Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery

The purpose of this clinical trial study is to compare the analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block Versus cervical erector spinae block in patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery.

* The main questions it aims to answer are:

* The primary outcome will be recording postoperative pain intensity using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). * The secondary outcomes will be measuring the performance time, onset of the sensory block, intraoperative fentanyl consumption, time to the first call for rescue analgesia (nalbuphine), postoperative total nalbuphine consumption, and postoperative complications such as nausea, vomiting, hypotension, and bradycardia. * We will compare two blocks to a placebo. * Participants will:

* undergo ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block or cervical erector spinae block or a placebo * Be assessed for pain after 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h postoperatively

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Conditions

Age range

21 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

About this study

Anterior cervical spine surgery is a common procedure for treating disc herniation, spinal cord vascular diseases, cervical spondylosis, and tumors. Cervical spine surgery is one of the most painful surgical operations, ranked among the 6 most painful out of 179 assessed surgical procedures, underscoring the challenges in pain management for this patients. Many patients requiring spine surgery are also overweight, have substance use disorders and other comorbidities related to aging.

Surgeons have been able to effectively treat patients with various cervical spine conditions by using specialized retractors, natural muscle planes, and paying careful attention to surrounding structures. However, despite the high success rates associated with these surgeries, patients often experience postoperative pain between the shoulder blades and in the neck.

Improper perioperative pain management after anterior cervical spine surgery can impact a patient's recovery, overall health, ability to swallow, may lead to nausea, vomiting, and chronic pain. Thus, effective pain management techniques are crucial to enhance postoperative care for these patients.

A regional analgesia block is a technique used to suppress nerve transmission and alleviate or prevent pain. It is commonly used in combination with general anesthesia or as the sole anesthetic technique, particularly in plastic, orthopedic and vascular surgeries to reduce the amount of anesthetic and analgesic agents needed, minimize systemic side effects, improve recovery, provide better postoperative pain relief, and shorten hospital stays.

The cervical plexus is made up of the ventral rami of the C1-C4 spinal nerves. The cervical plexus consists of motor (phrenic nerve, direct muscle branches) and terminal sensory branches (C2-C4): the supraclavicular nerves, the lesser occipital nerve, greater auricular nerve, and transverse cervical nerve. The latter is formed in the compartment between the prevertebral and superficial layer of the cervical fascia, deep to the sternocleidomastoid. Before 2004, any cervical plexus blocks that were performed superficially to the prevertebral fascia were termed superficial cervical plexus blocks. However, Telford and Stoneham suggested the term intermediate cervical plexus block to distinguish between the superficial block (subcutaneous or subplatysmal) and the block in the interfascial compartment. Intermediate cervical plexus block is a safe, popular, easy, and effective technique for regional analgesia of cervical region. The use of ultrasound guidance reduces the risk of complications, allows for real-time visualization of anatomical structures, and helps guide needle placement.

Bilateral cervical erector spinae block using ultrasound has recently been studied for shoulder surgery. Since the brachial plexus, phrenic nerves, cervical nerve roots, and deep cervical muscles are enclosed in the prevertebral fascia, injecting a local anesthetic near the cervical transverse process can spread to nearby structures within the prevertebral compartment. In a cadaver study, it was found that injecting a 20 mL dye solution into the transverse process of C6 or C7 resulted in staining of the C5-T1 nerve roots.

With the increasing number of nerve block techniques available, anesthesiologists may have difficulty determining the most appropriate technique to achieve optimal recovery after anterior cervical spine surgery. Therefore, this study will conducted to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block and cervical erector spinae block in patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Both sex
  • Age: between 21 and 60 years
  • Physical status: belongs to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I, II
  • Body mass index (BMI): from 25 to 30 kg/m2
  • Type of surgery: elective anterior cervical spine surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

  • Refusal of participation.
  • local infection at the puncture site.
  • Mental or physical disability.
  • History of allergy to study drugs (bupivacaine, fentanyl).
  • Hematological disorders including coagulation abnormalities.
  • Severe hepatic or kidney impairment.
  • Chronic pain.

Treatment and study plan

Block for Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery

Procedure

The patient will be positioned supine with a slight elevation of the head and the head turned away from the blocked side. After sterilizing the skin, the ultrasound probe will be placed over the middle of the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. The needle will be inserted in-plane while keeping the probe in a transverse position. The needle tip will be placed under the sternocleidomastoid muscle and below the superficial fascia, and then, a total volume of 15 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected bilaterally. The spread of the local anesthetic will be visualized using ultrasound guidance. The same steps will be repeated on the other side

Saline (NaCl 0,9 %) (placebo)

Drug

Total volume of 15 ml of saline 0.9% will be injected subcutaneous bilaterally

Primary outcomes

  1. change in postoperative pain intensity using Numerical Rating Scale

    Time frame: (Day 1) 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours postoperative

    Numeric Rating Scale ( NRS) score, a commonly used 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (no pain) to '10' representing the other pain extreme ( pain as bad as you can imagine or worst pain imaginable). The patient will be instructed to mark along the line to represent the intensity of pain currently being experienced.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in the time of performance of the technique in minutes.

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

    Time of performance of the technique: the time from probe insertion until the visualization of local anesthetic spread in minutes.

  2. Change in the time to the first call for analgesia (nalbuphine) in hours.

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

    The time to the first call for rescue analgesia (nalbuphine), which is the time between the end of surgery and the first report of postoperative pain, will be recorded in hours.

  3. The total measure of nalbuphine given to each patient during the first 24 hours of the postoperative period

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

    The total amount of nalbuphine in milligrams given to each patient during the first 24 hours of the postoperative period will be recorded.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Nadea H Fetouh, Professor

CONTACT

[email protected]

+201222832463

mohammed A khodair, master

CONTACT

[email protected]

+201004881505

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Tanta University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Preoperative Ultrasound-Guided Intermediate Cervical Plexus Block Versus Preoperative Cervical Erector Spinae Plane Block for Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study

Acronym: ESPB/ICPB

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Mar 10, 2025
Registry last updated
Mar 10, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.