Chi Mei Medical Center
Tainan, 710, Taiwan
NCT Number: NCT05493774
The purpose of this study was to compare the learning performance of trainees before and after learning burns and scald nursing care by applying the burns and scald virtual reality (VR) training module multi-person interactive training in different places and the traditional training model with a high-fidelity patient.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Tainan, 710, Taiwan
The clinical instructors, standard practice nurses, training content, and assessment process were the same for the experimental and control groups, except for the training methods of the interventions. A pre-recorded instructional video on burn care was provided to each participant one week prior to the experiment for self-study. The experiment procedure includes research description, pre-test and pre-test questionnaire (about 10 minutes), VR hands-on teaching or environment familiarization phase (about 10 minutes), multi-person simulation training (about 15 minutes) and post-test debrief (about 5 minutes), post-test and questionnaire (about 10 minutes). After completing all experiments, the collected data will be analyzed by the researcher using SPSS version 22.0 for descriptive, t-test, and other statistical analyses.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Using multi-person virtual reality simulation scenario training to evaluate the learning effectiveness of nursing care for emergency burn and scald patients.
Using multi-person high-fidelity simulation scenario training to evaluate the learning effectiveness of nursing care for emergency burn and scald patients.
Time frame: Pre- and post-instructional design (immediately before conducting and after completing simulation scenario training)
There were 10 items to evaluate the participants' knowledge of the burn and scald nursing care scale. Each item had four response options. The total score ranged from 0 to 10 and a higher score indicates a higher level of knowledge of burn and scalds nursing care.
Time frame: Pre- and post-instructional design (before conducting and immediately after completing simulation scenario training)
The motivation and attitude toward learning and personal self-efficacy scale included 21 items. Each item was scored on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total score ranged from 21 to 105 and a higher score indicated a positive motivation and attitude toward learning and a higher level of personal self-efficacy in burn and scald nursing care.
Time frame: Post-instruction (immediately after completing simulation scenario training)
The satisfaction of learning scale included 9 items. Each item was scored on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total score ranged from 9 to 45 and a higher score indicated a higher level of satisfaction with the learning intervention in burns and scald nursing care.
Chimei Medical Center
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06596837
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Prague, Czech Republic, Czechia
View Trial DetailsNCT06473311
Burns, Virtual Reality
Giza, Married, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07317271
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06235515
Neck Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
Kırşehir, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details