Pregabalin
Drug150-600mg/day, BID
NCT Number: NCT00141219
To evaluate the efficacy of pregabalin, using a flexible, optimized dose schedule with dose adjustment based on Daily Pain Rating Scale (DPRS), compared to placebo in subjects with peripheral neuropathic pain.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Pfizer Investigational Site, Sungnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
150-600mg/day, BID
Placebo
Time frame: Endpoint- Week 8 or Early Discontinuation
DPRS is 11-point rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Subjects instructed to describe their pain (daily upon awakening) during preceding 24 hrs by choosing the appropriate number between 0-10. Mean endpoint pain score was obtained from the last 7 available DPRS scores of the daily pain diary while subject on study medication.
Time frame: Endpoint- Week 8 or Early Discontinuation
DPRS consists of an 11-point rating scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). A 30% responder at endpoint is a subject who has a 30% or more reduction in mean pain score at endpoint compared to baseline
Time frame: Endpoint- Week 8 or Early Discontination
DPRS consists of an 11-point rating scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). A 50% responder at endpoint is a subject who has a 50% or more reduction in mean pain score at endpoint compared to baseline.
Time frame: Weeks 1 to 8
DPRS is 11-point rating scale (0=no pain to 10=worst possible pain). Subjects instructed to describe pain (upon awakening) during preceding 24 hrs by choosing appropriate number between 0-10. Mean endpoint pain score obtained from last 7 available DPRS scores of daily pain diary while subject on study medication. Overall Comparison=8-week average.
Time frame: Weeks 1 to 8
DAAC is a score used to assess treatment effects averaged over the entire length of the study. DAAC from baseline to weekly mean pain score was derived by calculating the mean of all post-baseline scores minus baseline mean pain score, and then weighing this according to the proportion of the planned study duration the subject actually completed.
Time frame: Endpoint- Week 8 or Early Discontinuation
DSIS consists of an 11-point rating scale (0 = pain did not interfere with sleep to 10 = completely interfered with sleep). Higher score indicating greater level of sleep disturbance.
Time frame: Weeks 1 to 8
DSIS consists of an 11-point rating scale ranging from 0 = pain did not interfere with sleep to 10 = pain completely interfered with sleep. Overall Comparison= 8-week average.
Time frame: Week 8
MOS Sleep Scale is a subject-rated questionnaire consisting of 12 items that assess the key constructs of sleep; assesses sleep for the 4 weeks prior to evaluation. The MOS Sleep Disturbance sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100, lower scores indicate less disturbance.
Time frame: Week 8
MOS Sleep Scale is a subject-rated questionnaire consisting of 12 items that assess the key constructs of sleep; assesses sleep for the 4 weeks prior to evaluation. The MOS Snoring sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100, lower scores indicate less snoring.
Time frame: Week 8
MOS Sleep Scale is a subject-rated questionnaire consisting of 12 items that assess the key constructs of sleep; assesses sleep for the 4 weeks prior to evaluation. The MOS Awaken Short of Breath or with a Headache sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100, lower scores indicate less difficulty.
Time frame: Week 8
MOS Sleep Scale is a subject-rated questionnaire consisting of 12 items that assess the key constructs of sleep; assesses sleep for the 4 weeks prior to evaluation. The MOS Sleep Quantity sub-scale scores range from 0 to 24 (number of hours slept).
Time frame: Week 8
MOS Sleep Scale is a subject-rated questionnaire consisting of 12 items that assess the key constructs of sleep; assesses sleep for the 4 weeks prior to evaluation. The MOS Optimal Sleep sub-scale score is a binary outcome derived from Sleep Quantity (SQ): the response is YES (or 1) if SQ = 7 or 8 hours per night.
Time frame: Week 8
MOS Sleep Scale is a subject-rated questionnaire consisting of 12 items that assess the key constructs of sleep; assesses sleep for the 4 weeks prior to evaluation. The MOS Sleep Adequacy sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100, higher scores indicate greater sleep adequacy.
Time frame: Week 8
MOS Sleep Scale is a subject-rated questionnaire consisting of 12 items that assess the key constructs of sleep; assesses sleep for the 4 weeks prior to evaluation. The MOS Somnolence sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100, lower scores indicate less somnolence.
Time frame: Week 8
MOS Sleep Scale is a subject-rated questionnaire consisting of 12 items that assess the key constructs of sleep; assesses sleep for the 4 weeks prior to evaluation. The MOS Overall Sleep Problems Index is a 9-item sub-scale; scores range from 0 to 100, lower scores indicate fewer sleep problems.
Time frame: Week 8
EQ-5D, a subject-completed questionnaire, assesses health-related QOL. QOL Health State Profile (HSP) is designed to record subject's level of current health across 5 domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort & anxiety/depression); scores are used to calculate EQ-5D Utility Score; range: -0.594 to 1.000 (from worst to best).
Time frame: Week 8
EQ-5D is a subject-completed questionnaire to assess health-related QOL (Health State Profile (HSP) & Visual Analog Scale (VAS)). The VAS is designed to rate the subject's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100 where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state.
Time frame: Week 8
HADS-A consists of 7 items that are assessed by a score of 0 = no anxiety to 3 = severe feeling of anxiety. The anxiety subscale determines a state of generalized anxiety (including anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks). Score range = 0 to 21; higher scores indicate a greater intensity of anxiety
Time frame: Week 8
HADS-D consists of 7 items that are assessed by a score of 0 = no depression to 3 = severe feeling of depression. The depression subscale focuses on the state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response ("lowering of hedonic tone"). Score range = 0 to 21; higher scores indicate a greater intensity of depression
Time frame: Week 8
PGIC is a subject-rated instrument that measured change in subject's overall status on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improved = minimally improved, much improved, and very much improved; Worse = minimally worse, much worse, and very much worse.
Time frame: Week 8
CGIC is a clinician-rated instrument that assesses the subject's overall global improvement on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improved = minimally improved, much improved, and very much improved; Worse = minimally worse, much worse, and very much worse.
Time frame: Weeks 1 to 8
DAAC is a score used to assess treatment effects averaged over the entire length of the study. DAAC from baseline to weekly mean pain score was derived by calculating the mean of all post-baseline scores minus baseline mean pain score, and then weighing this according to the proportion of the planned study duration the subject actually completed.
Time frame: Endpoint- Week 8 or Early Discontinuation
DPRS is 11-point rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Subjects instructed to describe their pain (daily upon awakening) during preceding 24 hrs by choosing the appropriate number between 0-10. Mean endpoint pain score was obtained from the last 7 available DPRS scores of the daily pain diary while subject on study medication.
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Industry
A 10-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin (150 mg - 600 mg/Day) Using a Flexible, Optimized Dose Schedule in Subjects With Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01124617
Chronic Pain, Diabetes Complications
Chigasaki, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT00001344
DNA Virus Infections, Diabetes Complications
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00082316
Blood-Borne Infections, Communicable Diseases
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06292962
Diabetes Complications, Diabetes Mellitus
Lahore, Pakistan
View Trial Details