GENPHASS, SANPSY, CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, 33076, France
NCT Number: NCT03821779
Experimental fear in rodents is correlated with slow oscillations in electrical recordings of prefrontal cortex activities. The present study aims to test whether slow prefrontal oscillations is a biomarker of pathological anxiety in human subjects.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bordeaux, 33076, France
Fear and anxiety are adaptive responses that may become excessive or inappropriate in pathological conditions, as defined as anxiety disorders in DSM-5. These disorders, including phobic disorders such as social anxiety disorder, are frequent and impairing in the general population, with an estimated lifetime prevalence of 28% and significant consequences on quality of life. Direct and indirect medical costs related to these conditions amount to 74.4 billion €/year in Europe. Despite their prevalence, debilitating nature and chronicity, the pathophysiology of anxiety disorders is poorly understood and neurobiological treatments, including pharmacotherapy, are lacking efficacy. A better understanding of the neuronal mechanisms implicated in anxiety is necessary for the conception of new approaches to treat pathological anxiety.
Anxiety is commonly modeled in animals using fear conditioning, which consists in associating a neutral stimulus (eg: a sound) with a mild electrical foot-shock. As a result of the association between sound and shock, sound presentation in isolation induces a set of conditioned behavioral responses, such as an immobilization ("freezing"). Previous studies have shown that the expression of fear responses, measured on the basis of freezing, is associated with the emergence of slow oscillations (2-6Hz) in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of mice. Moreover, emergence of these oscillations in mPFC is predictive of the occurrence of freezing, and the artificial induction of 4 Hz oscillations in mPFC with optogenetics induces freezing. Finally, inhibiting neurons in mPFC during the ascending phase of this slow mPFC oscillation at the time of conditioned sound presentation is sufficient to significantly reduce fear.
Interestingly, these results obtained in mice seem to find their prolongation in humans. Recent studies using fear conditioning in human subjects have also reported the emergence of prefrontal slow oscillations between 2-6 Hz during expression of conditioned fear responses. These results suggests that common mechanisms underlie the expression of fear in humans and rodents. However, whether similar neuronal circuits and mechanisms are implicated in human anxiety disorders remains unknown.
This study aims at assessing the presence of slow mPFC oscillations during expression of anxiety in patients suffering from anxiety disorders. Beyond understanding of the neuronal mechanisms underlying anxiety expression, this study could provide a biomarker of anxiety with diagnostic and therapeutic implications.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Subjects will be invited to give a 5 minutes oral presentation on the topic of their choice to five examiners displaying no facial emotional reaction, after a 5 minutes period of silent waiting in front of the examiners. This waiting period is prompt to elicit anticipation-type of social anxiety.
Subjects will give a 5 minutes oral presentation on the subject of their choice to a virtual reality panel composed of 5 examiners displaying no facial emotional reaction, after a 5 minutes period of silent waiting in front of the examiners. This waiting period is expected to elicit anticipation-type of social anxiety.
EEG will be recorded with a standard 16-electrodes cap. Recordings will start before the 5 minutes waiting period and continue throughout oral presentation and recovery. The recovery period will be used as a baseline control
Subjects will be evaluated prior to inclusion using the following assessment tools
Subjects will be asked to rate their anxiety levels
Time frame: During the 5 minutes before oral presentation and during the 1 hour rest period
The change in power of PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations between the 5-minutes waiting period before oral presentation and the recovery period will be computed as a ratio.
Detection of exaggerated 2-6Hz oscillations in prefrontal cortex during anxious anticipation is the primary aim of this study.
Time frame: During the 5 minutes before oral presentation
Time-frequency analysis will be performed to determine the duration of 2-6Hz prefrontal oscillations epochs and total duration of these oscillations within experimental period. Significant oscillatory epochs will be defined using power ratios. These metrics will be used in order to assess the neurobiological and clinical relevance of this biomarker.
Time frame: During the 5 minutes oral presentation and during the 1 hour rest period.
The change in power of PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations between the 5-minutes oral presentation and the recovery period will be computed as a ratio.
Time frame: During the 5 minutes oral presentation
Time-frequency analysis will be performed to determine the duration of 2-6Hz prefrontal oscillations epochs and total duration of these oscillations within experimental period. Significant oscillatory epochs will be defined using power ratios.
Time frame: During the 5 minutes before oral presentation
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations power and the visual Analogue anxiety score during the 5 minutes period before presentation.
Time frame: During the 5 minutes oral presentation
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations power and the visual Analogue anxiety score during presentation.
Time frame: During the 5 minutes before oral presentation
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations duration and the visual Analogue anxiety score during the 5 minutes period before presentation.
Time frame: During the 5 minutes oral presentation
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations duration and the visual Analogue anxiety score during presentation.
Time frame: During the 5 minutes before oral presentations (PFC oscillations power) and prior to inclusion (STAI-B rating)
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations power during the 5 minutes before presentation and STAI-B scores
Time frame: During the 5 minutes oral presentation (PFC oscillations power) and prior to inclusion (STAI-B rating)
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations power during presentation and STAI-B scores
Time frame: During the 5 minutes before oral presentation (PFC oscillations duration) and prior to inclusion (STAI-B rating)
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations duration during the 5 minutes before presentation and STAI-B scores
Time frame: During the 5 minutes oral presentation (PFC oscillations duration) and prior to inclusion (STAI-B rating)
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations duration during presentation and STAI-B scores
Time frame: During the 5 minutes before oral presentation (PFC oscillations power) and prior to inclusion (STAI-A rating)
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations power during the 5 minutes before presentation and STAI-A scores
Time frame: During the 5 minutes oral presentation (PFC oscillations power) and prior to inclusion (STAI-A rating)
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations power during presentation and STAI-A scores
Time frame: During the 5 minutes before oral presentation (PFC oscillations duration) and prior to inclusion (STAI-A rating)
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations duration during the 5 minutes before presentation and STAI-A scores
Time frame: During the 5 minutes oral presentation (PFC oscillations duration) and prior to inclusion (STAI-A rating)
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations duration during presentation and STAI-A scores
Time frame: During the 5 minutes before oral presentation (PFC oscillations power) and prior to inclusion (LSAS rating)
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations power during the 5 minutes before presentation and LSAS scores
Time frame: During the 5 minutes oral presentation (PFC oscillations power) and prior to inclusion (LSAS rating)
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations power during presentation and LSAS scores
Time frame: During the 5 minutes before oral presentation (PFC oscillations duration) and prior to inclusion (LSAS rating)
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations duration during the 5 minutes before presentation and LSAS scores
Time frame: During the 5 minutes oral presentation (PFC oscillations duration) and prior to inclusion (LSAS rating)
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations duration during presentation and LSAS scores
Time frame: During the 5 minutes before oral presentation (PFC oscillations power) and prior to inclusion (BAS rating)
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations power during the 5 minutes before presentation and BAS scores
Time frame: During the 5 minutes oral presentation (PFC oscillations power) and prior to inclusion (BAS rating)
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations power during presentation and BAS scores
Time frame: During the 5 minutes before oral presentation (PFC oscillations duration) and prior to inclusion (BAS rating)
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations duration during the 5 minutes before presentation and BAS scores
Time frame: During the 5 minutes oral presentation (PFC oscillations duration) and prior to inclusion (BAS rating)
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations duration during presentation and BAS scores
Time frame: During the 5 minutes before oral presentation (PFC oscillations power) and prior to inclusion (MARDS rating)
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations power during the 5 minutes before presentation and MADRS scores
Time frame: During the 5 minutes oral presentation (PFC oscillations power) and prior to inclusion (MARDS rating)
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations power during presentations and MADRS scores
Time frame: During the 5 minutes before oral presentation (PFC oscillations duration) and prior to inclusion (MARDS rating)
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations duration during the 5 minutes before presentation and MADRS scores
Time frame: During the 5 minutes oral presentations (PFC oscillations duration) and prior to inclusion (MARDS rating)
Correlation will be calculated between PFC 2-6 Hz oscillations duration during presentation and MADRS scores
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
Other Gov
Study of Slow Prefrontal Cortex Oscillations During Social Exposure in Social Anxiety Disorder
Acronym: POSAD
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06981000
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT06502483
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Brighton, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05548699
Anxiety Disorders, Anxiety and Fear
Bad Mergentheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT03491384
Anxiety, Anxiety Chronic
Boulder, Colorado, United States
View Trial Details