Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00293241

PreFER Managed Ventricular Pacing (MVP) For Elective Replacement

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the benefit of MVP in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients with a history of right ventricular pacing.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Medtronic Bakken Research Center

Maastricht, Netherlands

About this study

A number of clinical studies (Danish I, Danish II, David, MOST) over the past few years have shown that, in patients with intact atrioventricular (AV) conduction, unnecessary chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing can cause a variety of detrimental effects, including atrial fibrillation (AF), left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, and congestive heart failure (CHF). These effects are believed to result from the mechanical dyssynchrony and ventricular chamber dysfunction that occurs with chronic, single-site, apical ventricular stimulation.

Therefore a new pacing modality, Managed Ventricular Pacing (MVP), was designed to give preference to natural heart activity by minimizing unnecessary right ventricular pacing. This is accomplished by automatically switching between single chamber atrial and dual-chamber pacing based on specific patient needs.

MVP is an atrial-based dual-chamber pacing mode that provides functional AAI/R pacing with ventricular monitoring and back-up DDD/R pacing only as needed during episodes of AV block.

The reversibility of the detrimental effects caused by ventricular pacing has been initially investigated in small patient populations with short pacing durations in AAI and needs further investigation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients implanted with a dual chamber device (including atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited [VDD]) for a minimum time duration of 2 years
  • Planned to be replaced or replaced with a device including the MVP feature
  • Have had more than 40% ventricular pacing documented with their old device over a period of at least 4 weeks before enrollment or device replacement.
  • Pacing should not be caused by a switch to the single chamber pacing (VVI) mode because of battery depletion
  • Have signed the informed consent
  • Have no need to change the pacing mode or the atrioventricular (AV) intervals.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) indication
  • Permanent AF
  • Permanent AV block
  • Inability to complete follow-up visits at a study center.
  • Unwillingness or inability to cooperate or give written informed consent, or the patient is a minor, and legal guardian refuses to give informed consent
  • Planned cardiovascular intervention
  • Inclusion in another clinical trial that will affect the objectives of this study
  • Neurocardiogenic syncope as primary implantable pulse generator (IPG) indication.

Treatment and study plan

Managed Ventricular Pacing programmed ON/OFF

Device

Device programming

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to Event Analysis: Number of Patients Who Experienced the First Cardiovascular Hospitalization Within 2 Years Post-implant

    Time frame: Implant to 2 years post-implant

    Time to first event of cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization from implant to 2 years post-implant.

    Hospitalization is defined as:

    • admission to hospital involving one overnight stay or
    • emergency room / office visits that result in cardioversions or acute treatment of worsened cardiac condition

    Cardiovascular is defined as new or worsening:

    • heart failure (HF),
    • angina,
    • myocardial infarction (MI),
    • any arrhythmia,
    • stroke,
    • transient ischemic attack (TIA),
    • acute peripheral vascular emergencies,
    • pulmonary embolism.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Event Analysis: Number of Patients Who Experienced Death or First Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization Within 2 Years Post-implant.

    Time frame: Implant to 2 years post-implant

    Time to first event of death or cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization from implant to 2 years post-implant

  2. Time to Event Analysis: Number of Patients With Persistent AT/AF Within 2 Years Post-implant

    Time frame: Implant to 2 years post-implant

    Time to first event of atrial tachycardia/ atrial fibrillation (AT/AF) fulfilling one of the following criteria:

    • 7 days in a row with device diagnostic showing 20 or more hours in AT/AF or
    • a cardioversion was done to terminate AT/AF or
    • the patient is during 2 consecutive follow-up (FU) visits in AT/AF
  3. Time to Event Analysis: Number of Patients With Permanent AF Within 2 Years Post-implant

    Time frame: Implant to 2 years post-implant

    Time to development of permanent AF fulfilling one of the following criteria:

    • 7 days in a row with device diagnostic showing 20 or more hours in AT/AF and cardioversion failed or
    • 7 days in a row with device diagnostic showing 20 or more hours in AT/AF and the investigator decides not to cardiovert the patient
  4. Ventricular Pacing Percentage

    Time frame: Implant to 2 years post-implant

    Endpoint: Cumulative percentage ventricular pacing documented in the device memory

  5. Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF,%) Over 2 Years Time

    Time frame: Implant to 2 years post-implant

    Endpoint: LVEF (%) difference between 2 year post implant and baseline

  6. Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class

    Time frame: Baseline, one year and 2 year post-implant

    Endpoint: NYHA classification at Baseline, one year and 2 year post-implant. (Class I is considered a better category and Class IV is considered worse) I Patients with cardiac disease but resulting in no limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea or anginal pain.

    II Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea or anginal pain.

    III Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea or anginal pain.

    IV Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure or the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.

  7. Change in Use of Anticoagulation

    Time frame: Implant to 2 years post-implant

    Endpoint: Use of Anticoagulation at enrollment and every follow-up visit

  8. Change in the Use of Cardiovascular Medication Over Time

    Time frame: Implant to 2 years post-implant

    Endpoint: Use of Diuretics, ACE Inhibitors, Beta-Blockers, digitalis, calcium antagonists and antiarrhythmic drugs at enrollment, and 1month, 12 months, and 24 mnths after implant

  9. Incidence of High Voltage Therapies

    Time frame: Implant to 2 years post-implant

    Endpoint: A high voltage therapy delivered

  10. Time to Event Analysis: Number of Patients Who Died Within 2 Years Post-implant

    Time frame: Implant to 2 years post-implant

    Time to patient death from any cause

  11. Stroke

    Time frame: Implant to 2 years post-implant

    Endpoint: Stroke

  12. Number of Cardiovascular Related Hospitalizations

    Time frame: Implant to 4 years post-implant

    Endpoint: Number of Cardiovascular hospitalizations per subject

  13. Duration of Cardiovascular Related Hospitalizations

    Time frame: Implant to 4 years post-implant

    Endpoint: Duration of Cardiovascular Hospitalizations per subject

  14. Incidence of Class I Pacemaker (Implantable Pulse Generator = IPG) Indication in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Patients

    Time frame: Implant to 2 years post-implant

    Endpoint: Patient implanted with a replacement ICD developing a class 1 pacemaker indication

  15. Change in PR Interval, Change in QRS Duration and Change in P-wave Duration

    Time frame: Implant to 2 years post-implant

    Endpoint: Change in PR interval, Change in QRS duration and Change in P-wave duration evaluated at enrollment and 24 Month FU

  16. Patient Symptoms

    Time frame: Implant to 2 years post-implant

    Endpoint: Symptoms evaluated at enrollment, 12 months and 24 months followup

  17. Atrial Pacing Percentage

    Time frame: 2 years post-implant

    Endpoint: Cumulative percentage atrial pacing documented in the device memory

  18. Health State

    Time frame: 2 years post-implant

    Endpoint: Health State evaluation with the EQ-5D questionnaire (range 0-100) . A measure of 100 is better and a measure of 0 is worse.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

PreFER MVP for Elective Replacement

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2011
First posted
Feb 17, 2006
Registry last updated
Jun 24, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.