Cairo University
Cairo, 12613, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT07163351
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of a new modification of ring technique using omputeraided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) milling of allogeneic bone block for anterior maxilla ridge augmentation with immediate implantation
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, 12613, Egypt
Dental implant failure remains a clinically significant challenge, with early failures typically attributed to insufficient osseointegration, surgical trauma, bacterial contamination, or micromotion during healing. In contrast, late failures are often associated with occlusal overload, peri-implantitis, or implant mispositioning.
These challenges have driven the adoption of allogeneic bone blocks, particularly those fabricated using computeraided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology, which offer precise anatomical adaptation, reduced surgical time, and minimized complications compared to manual grafting techniques
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
CAD/CAM allogenic bone block augmentation with immediate non-functional implant loading
Time frame: 18 months post-procedure
Vertical/Horizonal Bone Gain was measured via cone beam computed tomography superimposition at 18 months
Time frame: 18 months post-procedure
Implant survival rate, defined as the absence of clinical mobility, peri-implant infection, persistent pain, or radiographic evidence of peri-implant radiolucency or bone loss beyond expected physiological remodelling. Implant stability was assessed clinically using percussion and mobility tests, and radiographically using periapical radiographs and/or cone-beam computed tomography at designated follow-up intervals. Survival was evaluated at 6, 12, and 18 months postoperatively
Time frame: 18 months post-procedure
Assessment of aesthetic outcome were assessed using the Pink Esthetic Score (PES), a validated clinical index that evaluates seven soft tissue parameters around the implant site: mesial and distal papillae, soft tissue level, soft tissue contour, alveolar process deficiency, soft tissue color, and texture. PES was evaluated at 12 and 18 months by two calibrated examiners blinded to the treatment allocation.
Time frame: 18 months post-procedure
Patient-reported satisfaction with the aesthetic and functional outcomes was measured using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Patients were asked to rate their satisfaction with the final restoration, including perceived appearance, comfort, and chewing efficiency at 12 and 18 months postoperatively. Mean VAS scores were analyzed and compared over time.
Tanta University
Other
Prefabricated CAD CAM Allogeneic Ring Blocks in the Anterior Maxilla With Immediate Implantation a Prospective Single-Arm Clinical Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04418596
CAM, Femoracetabular Impingement
Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT06294769
Acute Pain, CAM
São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT06154018
CAD, Cardiac Surgery
Ioannina, Epirus, Greece
View Trial DetailsNCT02132611
CAD
Chandler, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details