NCT Number: NCT02782793
Predictors of Unsuccessful Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Complex Colon Polyps
A prospective outcomes study in patients referred for endoscopic mucosal resection of complex colon polyps.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year–90 year
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Observational
Primary location
UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States
About this study
Colon cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. The number of these deaths has significantly decreased due to screening colonoscopies. A colonoscopy is a procedure in which a physician examines the rectum and large intestines for abnormalities through the use of a specialized camera called an endoscope. Colonoscopies decrease the mortality associated with colon cancer through two main ways: by detecting and removing pre-cancerous lesions called polyps; and by detecting colon cancer at earlier stage, when therapies can still be effective at treating or removing the cancer.
Most colon polyps are small and can be completely removed during a standard colonoscopy. However, there is a growing awareness amongst endoscopists of polyps that are too large or inaccessible to be safely removed during a routine colonoscopy. Previously, these lesions required surgery for removal of the affected part of the colon. There is a growing body of evidence that suggests these more complex colon polyps can be entirely removed endoscopically through a procedure called endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), thereby avoiding costly and debilitating surgery. Given that it is a novel procedure, it is only available at specialized care centers.
EMR is a procedure identical to a colonoscopy, with more steps involved in the lifting and removal of complex polyps. As many as 80-90% of complex polyps can be successfully removed with EMR. However, it has been noted that removal of the polyp in pieces, rather than as a whole can result in a 20-30% recurrence rate at the resection site. Any manipulation of the polyp prior to EMR may impair the ability to fully remove the lesion. Some factors that have previously been suggested to increase the difficulty of EMR include previous dye injections, removal attempts, and polyp sampling. However, the true impact of previous manipulations of CCPs remains unclear.
This study aims to be one of the largest prospective, multi-centered studies investigating factors that predict the failure of EMR in the removal of complex colon polyps.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- All patients referred to each of the participating tertiary care centers for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)
Exclusion criteria
- Does not meet inclusion criteria
Treatment and study plan
Primary outcomes
-
Endoscopic and clinical factors which predict failure of resection of large colon polyps
Time frame: 5 year follow up
A systematic, prospective collection of data from a large cohorts of patients referred for colon EMR will provide useful data in effort to improve overall patient outcomes.
Secondary outcomes
-
Efficacy (%) of Endoscopic resection for large colon polyps
Time frame: 5 year follow up
-
Factors which predict recurrence of adenoma after large polyp resection
Time frame: 5 year follow up
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Northwestern University
Other
Collaborators
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
- University of California, Los Angeles
- University of Colorado, Denver
Registry information
Official study title
Predictors of Unsuccessful Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Complex Colon Polyps: "You Can Look But You Can't Touch"
Important dates
- Study start
- 2014
- Primary completion
- 2016
- Study completion
- 2016
- First posted
- May 25, 2016
- Registry last updated
- Jun 16, 2017
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Safety of Endoscopic Resection of Large Colorectal Polyps: A Randomized Trial.
NCT01936948
Colon Polyps, Colonic Polyps
White River Junction, Vermont, United States
View Trial DetailsClinical Study to Compare Cold Snare Underwater Polypectomy to Cold Snare Conventional Polypectomy for Colon Polyps [COLDWATER Study]
NCT05273697
Colon Polyps, Colonic Polyps
Athens, Greece
View Trial DetailsA Pilot Randomized Trial of Polypectomy Techniques for 4-6 mm Colonic Polyps
NCT04666194
Colon Polyps, Colonic Polyps
Carmel, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsComparison of Colon Adenoma Detection Rate Using Two Distal Colonoscope Attachments
NCT02665741
Colon Adenomas, Colon Cancer Screening
Sacramento, California, United States
View Trial Details