Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01624844

Predictive Value of Ultrasound Measurement of the Dural Sac Volume on the Sensory Level in Spinal Anesthesia

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the dural sac volume as determined by a geometrical calculation following multilevel measurements of its transverse area and length by ultrasound imaging, correlates with the intrathecal spread of a single dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine in a non-obstetrical population.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1, Canada

About this study

Sensory block extent may be difficult to predict in spinal anesthesia. Many factors influencing the intrathecal spread have been identified. Among the most important factors is the lumbosacral cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volume and the dimensions of the dural sac. One study using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reported significant correlations between CSF volume and sensory block levels following spinal anesthesia. However, unlike ultrasound imaging, MRI can be difficult to obtain in the surgical setting. Although ultrasound imaging of the lumbar spine may not directly determine the CSF volume, multilevel measurements of the transverse area and length of the dural sac by ultrasound imaging followed by a geometrical calculation of its volume could help predict the extent of the intrathecal spread.

Methods: Patients scheduled for elective surgery under spinal anesthesia will be considered for this study. Ultrasound imaging will be achieved in a non-sterile manner with the patient in the sitting position. Spinal imaging will be performed using a low frequency probe. Focus and gain will be optimized. The first images will be made to identify the inter-laminar spaces from T11 to S1. At each level, the area of the dural sac will be measured in short axis using an adjustable ruler built-in the ultrasound monitor. The middle of the inter-laminar spaces will be marked on the patient's skin and the length of the dural sac will be defined as the distance between the middle of T11-12 and L5-S1. The total volume will be geometrically calculated. The L3-L4 space will be localized by triangulation and marked on the patient's skin as the optimal puncture site for spinal anesthesia. The optimal puncture angle will also be determined.

After placement of standard non-invasive monitoring, spinal anesthesia will be performed using 27-G Pencan needle. After aspiration of CSF, a solution of hyperbaric bupivacaine and fentanyl will be injected over a period of 15 seconds. The dose of bupivacaine will be determined by the attendant anaesthesiologist. The aspiration of CSF will be repeated at the end of the injection. Subsequently, the patient will be placed in supine position.

The extent of sensory block will be assessed by loss of pinprick sensation (using a #5.88 Von Frey filament) and loss of cold sensation to ice every 10 minutes until the same sensory level is observed in two consecutive assessments for a minimum period of 30 minutes. The extent of the block will be assessed bilaterally from caudal to cranial direction in the mid-clavicular line beginning at L3. The investigators will consider the peak sensory level as the uppermost blocked dermatome.

Total amount of crystalloids administered, incidence of significant hypotension and bradycardia will be recorded. Time to perform ultrasound measurements and time to discharge will also be noted. Resolution of the motor block will be assessed using the Bromage score at 3.5 hour, 4 and 4.5 hour following the injection of bupivacaine.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Consenting patients aged 18-80 years
  • ASA physical status 1-3

Exclusion criteria

  • Contraindication to regional anesthesia (coagulopathy, sepsis or local infection at the site of injection, pre-existing neuropathy in the area involved)
  • Surgery requiring the use of isobaric bupivacaine (0.5%)
  • Allergy to local anesthetics (amide group)
  • Anatomic abnormality of the spine (scoliosis, kyphosis)
  • Previous spinal surgery
  • Patient refusal

Treatment and study plan

Geometrical calculation of dural sac volume

Other

Geometrical calculation of the lumbar dural sac volume following multilevel measurements by ultrasound imaging before spinal anesthesia

Primary outcomes

  1. Geometrical calculation of the lumbar dural sac volume following multilevel measurements by ultrasound imaging

    Time frame: Before spinal anesthesia (Day 0)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Peak sensory level

    Time frame: From injection of bupivacaine until 30 minutes after injection (Day 0)

  2. Time spent for ultrasound imaging measurements

    Time frame: Before spinal anesthesia (Day 0)

  3. Duration of motor block

    Time frame: At 3.5, 4 and 4.5 hours following injection of bupivacaine (Day 0)

  4. Incidence of side-effects related to spinal anesthesia

    Time frame: From spinal injection of bupivacaine until discharge from the hospital (Patients will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 days)

  5. Length of stay in the recovery room

    Time frame: From arrival to discharge from the recovery room (Patients will be followed for the duration of stay in the recovery room on the day of surgery, an expected average of one hour)

  6. Length of stay in the hospital

    Time frame: From surgery to discharge from the hospital (Patients will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 days)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Predictive Value of an Ultrasound Model of Measurement of the Dural Sac Volume on the Sensory Level Obtained by Spinal Anesthesia

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Jun 21, 2012
Registry last updated
Jun 9, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.