Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04913727

Prediction of Reverse Remodeling and Outcome in Patients With Severe Secondary Mitral Valve Regurgitation Undergoing Transcatheter Edge-to-edge Mitral Valve Repair

The investigators' hypothesis is that CMR tissue characterization and myocardial function analysis acquired by CMR feature tracking technique predict reverse remodeling in patients with severe secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) undergoing transcatheter mitral edge-to-edge repair.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, Bern

Bern, 3010, Switzerland

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Christoph Gräni, Prof

CONTACT

[email protected]

+41316324508

About this study

Diametrically opposed results of the COAPT- and the MITRA-FR trial have demonstrated the need for additional evidence in the field of transcatheter mitral edge-to-edge repair. Reverse left ventricular remodeling after treatment of severe secondary mitral regurgitation can indicate treatment response and is associated with positive outcomes.

However, so far it is reverse remodeling, respectively treatment response is difficult to predict, which complicates patient selection for mitral edge-to-edge repair. Previous studies have shown, that focal (late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)) but not diffuse myocardial fibrosis (T1 mapping and extracellular volume fraction (ECV)) burden quantification using CMR predicts reverse left ventricular remodeling following cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). On the other hand, myocardial T1 mapping was predictive for beneficial left ventricular remodeling after long-term heart failure therapy. Furthermore, in patients with HFrEF, LGE is associated with clinical outcome and an incremental predictive value to left ventricular dimensions and function. However, as only 1/3 of HFrEF patients show LGE, subtle fibrosis might be missed. Recently the investigators have shown that different novel fibrosis detection techniques (naive T1 mapping, mean ECV and λGd being the delta of pre- and post T1 mapping and ECV calculation) all demonstrated strong association with outcome in patients with heart failure.

The investigators' hypothesis is that these markers (CMR tissue characterization and myocardial function analysis acquired by a CMR feature tracking) might also be helpful in predicting reverse remodeling after transcatheter mitral edge-to-edge repair. This project might help to understand the pathophysiology of the disease in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation, improve risk stratification in this clinical setting, and optimize selection of patients who benefit from transcatheter mitral edge-to-edge repair.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with severe secondary MR characterized, according to the European guidelines and recommendations, by a regurgitant volume ≥30 mL/beat or an effective regurgitant orifice ≥20 mm².
  • Symptomatic patients with New York Heart Association Class ≥II.
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction between 15% and 50%.
  • Optimal standard of care therapy for heart failure according to investigator.
  • Not eligible for a mitral surgery intervention according to the Heart Team.
  • Patients who have the ability to understand the requirements of the study and provide written consent/assent to participate and agree to abide by the study requirements.

Exclusion criteria

  • Participants younger than 18 years
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Severe impaired renal function (GFR < 15 ml/min)
  • Patients with untreated severe concomitant valve disease (e.g. severe tricuspid valve regurgitation, aortic stenosis)
  • The patient has a medical condition, serious concurrent illness, or extenuating circumstance that would significantly decrease study compliance, including all prescribed follow-up
  • The patient has contraindications to CMR, including: Implanted non-CMR conditional metallic implants, pacemaker, intracardiac defibrillator, neurostimulator, epicardial pacemaker leads, or any abandoned leads, ferromagnetic aneurysm clip, ferromagnetic halo device, cochlear implants, implanted infusion pumps or severe claustrophobia
  • The patient is clinically unstable or has stage D congestive heart failure or inability to lay flat for 60 minutes

Treatment and study plan

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging before the procedure

Diagnostic Test

CMR image acquisition with previously mentioned analysis

Transcatheter mitral edge-to-edge repair.

Procedure

Included patients will undergo Transcatheter mitral edge-to-edge repair.

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of patients with reverse remodeling after 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months after mitral edge-to-edge repair

    Defined as ≥10% reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume in patients with successful MR reduction to grade 2+ or less 12 months after mitral edge-to-edge repair assessed by echocardiography.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of patients with procedural and device success

    Time frame: 24 months after mitral edge-to-edge repair

    Procedural and device success as defined according to the criteria of the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium

  2. Rate of patients with reverse remodeling after 6 and 24 months

    Time frame: 6 and 24 months after mitral edge-to-edge repair

    Reverse remodeling at 6 and 24 months, defined according to previously mentioned criteria.

  3. Change of left ventricular sphericity index

    Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after mitral edge-to-edge repair

    Echocardiographic assessment of LV sphericity index measured using the LV short/long axis dimension ratio in the end-diastolic four-chamber apical view.

  4. Change in NT-proBNP levels

    Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after mitral edge-to-edge repair

    Change in NT-proBNP levels as an indirect sign of changes in left ventricular filling pressure, fibrosis and reverse remodeling will be measured in clinically indicated follow-ups at different time points after the intervention.

  5. All cause death

    Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after mitral edge-to-edge repair

    Occurence of death from any cause

  6. Cardiovascular death

    Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after mitral edge-to-edge repair

    Occurence of death from cardiovascular reason

  7. Rate of patients with heart-failure related hospitalization

    Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after mitral edge-to-edge repair

    Hospitalizations for heart failure within the observation time will be systematically recorded.

  8. Change in NYHA class

    Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after mitral edge-to-edge repair

    Change in NYHA class ≥ +/- 1 compared to baseline NYHA-class before mitral edge-to-edge repair.

  9. Change in myocardial strain

    Time frame: Within 24 months after mitral edge-to-edge repair

    Clinically indicated follow-up imaging (CMR) will be analyzed by CMR feature tracking

  10. Change in left ventricular ejection fraction

    Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after mitral edge-to-edge repair

    Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction measured according to biplane Simpson disk summation method.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Christoph MD Gräni, PHD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+41 31 632 4508

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

Other

Collaborators

  • Cardiocentro Ticino
  • Triemli Hospital
  • University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Registry information

Acronym: PRE-MITRA

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jun 4, 2021
Registry last updated
Oct 18, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.