Laureate Institute for Brain Research
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136, United States
NCT Number: NCT03925987
Anxiety disorders affect over a quarter of the population, yet very little is known about the variables that predict treatment outcome. The planned study explores whether a patient's response to a physiological test involving inhalation of carbon dioxide predicts their response to exposure therapy.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–55 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136, United States
Anxiety Sensitivity (AS) refers to an individual's fear of experiencing anxiety-related symptoms (e.g., dyspnea or heart palpitations) and is a core construct underlying the initiation and maintenance of pathological anxiety. Recent evidence suggests that reducing AS may be critical for the prevention and treatment of anxiety across diagnostic categories. Exposure therapy, an important component of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), is one of the most effective treatments for reducing AS, and has been shown to improve symptoms across a number of different anxiety disorders. Meta-analyses reveal an approximately 50% treatment response rate, with the remaining half of patients showing either no response or dropping out of treatment early. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of research exploring which variables predict treatment outcome and there are currently no tests for predicting which patients would benefit the most from exposure therapy. In this study, participants will complete two sessions of a carbon dioxide (CO2) habituation paradigm, a safe and noninvasive physiological test that entails repeated exposures to single vital capacity inhalations of 20% CO2. Both CO2 testing sessions will be completed within a 72-hour time period. Patients then complete a 10-week group-based exposure therapy to determine whether an individual's degree of habituation to CO2 predicts treatment outcome.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
10 weekly sessions of group-based exposure therapy
Time frame: Across two days of CO2 testing within a 72-hour window
Maximum anxiety rating on a 10-point rating dial (0=no anxiety to 10=most anxiety ever) during day 1 of CO2 testing minus the maximum anxiety rating during day 2 of CO2 testing
Time frame: Across two days of CO2 testing within a 72-hour window
Dyspnea rating (difficulty breathing, shortness of breath or smothering) on a 100-point visual analogue scale (0=not at all to 100=extremely) during day 1 of CO2 testing minus the dyspnea rating during day 2 of CO2 testing
Time frame: Across two days of CO2 testing within a 72-hour window
Average response latency (in seconds) between vital capacity breaths of CO2 during day 1 of CO2 testing minus the average response latency during day 2 of CO2 testing
Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Inc.
Other
Predicting Treatment Response to Exposure Therapy Using a CO2 Habituation Paradigm in Patients With High Levels of Anxiety Sensitivity
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03785223
Agoraphobia, Anxiety Disorders
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT03051074
Agoraphobia, Anxiety Disorders
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03206437
Agoraphobia, Anxiety Disorders
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03156556
Agoraphobia, Anxiety Disorders
Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
View Trial Details