Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de marseille
Marseille, France
NCT Number: NCT07192315
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized cancer therapy, providing unprecedented responses in a wide range of malignancies. However, they induced various immune-related adverse events (iRAE) that can be life-threatening. About 20% of patients treated with an ICI monotherapy, and up to 60% of patients treated with a combination of ICIs, experienced a severe iRAE. Most side effects are reversible if managed early, but can affect survival and quality of life, leading to treatment interruptions or hospitalization. Some of these irAEs, particularly those affecting hormonal functions, may be irreversible and persist even after treatment discontinuation.
The development of predictive biomarkers of such toxicities is an unmet medical need. The variety of mechanisms involved in iRAE, and the lack of effective animal models, could probably explain why the topic remains largely unexplored. To date, some biomarkers predictive of the occurrence of iRAE, irrespective of the type of organ affected, have been identified by state-of-the-art techniques on small cohorts prior to treatment initiation, but none is individually robust enough to be used in daily practice.
We hypothesize that a signature derived from the integrative analysis of various biological parameters (immunomonitoring, auto-immunity features, viral monitoring, microbiota monitoring, fragmentome analysis, pharmacokinetics, radiomics and genetics), available in routine hospital practice, could answer this question, and thus enable the development of specific prevention strategies
The objectives are :
Primary objective:
Identify a baseline predictive signature for severe iRAE, irrespective of the type of organ affected.
Secondary objectives:
* Identify a predictive signature for severe iRAE including baseline and T1 data, irrespective of the type of organ affected. * Identify a baseline predictive signature for organ-specific severe iRAE. * Identify a predictive signature for organ-specific severe iRAE including baseline and T1 data. * Identify a baseline predictive signature for severe iRAE, irrespective of the type of organ affected, for patient receiving an anti-PD(L)1 in monotherapy. * Identify a baseline predictive signature for severe iRAE, irrespective of the type of organ affected, for patient receiving an anti-PD(L)1 in combination. * Identify a baseline predictive signature for severe iRAE, irrespective of the type of organ affected, for each specific immunotherapy received. * Compare the predictive signatures between responders and non-responders according to RECIST 1.1 in order not to overlook the influence of clinical response on the variability observed. * Describe the results obtained for each biological parameter between severe irAEs and non-severe irAEs patients. * Describe patient-reported outcomes and quality of life parameters.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Marseille, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Blood will be sampled At Visit 1, 2, 3 and 4. For patients presenting immuno-induced adverse events (iRAEs), an additionnal visit V tox will be planned will a blood sampling.
Pharyngeal swab will be sampled at visit 4 for patients without immuno-induced adverse events (iRAEs) Pharyngeal swab will be sampled at visit Tox for patients presenting immuno-induced adverse events (iRAEs)
Cuteanous swab will be sampled at visit 1, 2, 3 and 4 for patients without immuno-induced adverse events (iRAEs).
Cuteanous swab will be sampled at visit 1, 2, 3 and tox for patients presenting immuno-induced adverse events (iRAEs).
Stools sample will be collected at visit 1, 2, 3 and 4 for patients without immuno-induced adverse events (iRAEs).
Stools sample will be collected at visit 1, 2, 3 and tox for patients presenting immuno-induced adverse events (iRAEs).
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of following after 12 months
The primary endpoint is the identification of a predictive baseline signature who maximize the rate of prediction of severe iRAE among patients who had a severe iRAE (iRAE + patients) and minimize the rate of prediction of severe iRAE among patients who had not a severe iRAE (iRAE- patients), we choose a minimum of 70% of prediction in iRAE + population and a maximum of 15% of prediction in iRAE- population.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of following after 12 months
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of following after 12 months
Predictive performance of baseline + T1 signatures for severe iRAEs
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of following after 12 months
Predictive performance of baseline signatures for organ-specific severe iRAEs using the same performance thresholds.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of following after 12 months
Predictive performance of baseline + T1 signatures for organ-specific severe iRAEs.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of following after 12 months
Performance of baseline signatures for severe iRAEs in patients receiving anti-PD(L)1 monotherapy.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of following after 12 months
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of following after 12 months
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of following after 12 months
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of following after 12 months
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of following after 12 months
NCI-PRO-CTCAE (Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events): which is a 81-item instruments designed to measure symptoms and side effects for patients through treatment for their cancer. Items are constructed on a 5-point Likert scale with the following response options: 1 "Not at all" / 2 "A little" / 3 "Quite a bit" / 4 "severe" / 5 "Extremely severe".
Time frame: From enrollement to the end of following after 12 months
EORTC QLQ-C30 : European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, which is a 30-item instrument designed to measure quality of life in all cancer patients. 28 items are constructed on a 4-point Likert scale with the following response options: 1 "Not at all" / 2 "A little" / 3 "Quite a bit" / 4 "A lot." The last two items are constructed on a 7-point response scale.
These two items assess the patient's physical condition and overall quality of life, respectively, with response 1 corresponding to a "very poor" condition and response 7 to an "excellent".
Time frame: From enrollement to end of the following after 12 months
EQ-5D-5L, which is descriptive system EuroQol comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. Scale frome 1 to 100, where 0 is the worst possible condition and 100 is the best.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
Other
Acronym: PREDICTO
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07167381
Cancer, Disease Attributes
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07151807
Cancer, IGF1R
Çanakkale, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07708103
Solid Tumor Malignancies
Wuhan, Hubei, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07704515
Solid Tumor Malignancies
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial Details