Kepler University Hospital
Linz, Upper Austria, 4021, Austria
NCT Number: NCT05915429
Misalignment of IOLs can cause severe loss of visual quality. Different types of misalignment are known. Tilt is one type of misalignment that is thought to play a negative role for the optical performance in eyes with IOL designs, especially, if they have aspheric, toric or multifocal optics.
Due to the fact that tilt has an influence on visual quality, the prediction of the post-operative tilt could improve IOL power calculaton significantly especially for toric IOLs. the Aim of this study is to measure tilt with two modern OCT based devices and one Scheimpflug camera and to predict the post-operative tilt using partial least squares regression.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Linz, Upper Austria, 4021, Austria
During cataract surgery an artificial intraocular lens (IOL) is implanted in the eye to replace the lens and to correct the refraction for distance vision. Misalignment of IOLs can cause severe loss of visual quality. Different types of misalignment are known. Tilt, one type of IOL misalignment is thought to play a negative role for the optical performance in eyes with IOL designs, especially, if they have aspheric, toric, or multifocal optics. For example, in the case of aspheric IOLs, it appears that even slight amount of tilt may result not only in the loss of the effect of reducing spherical aberrations but in more severe cases even a worsening of the optical quality compared to spherical IOLs. In the case of toric IOLs, tilt introduces higher order aberrations potentially mimicking astigmatism. In the case of multifocal IOLs, tilt increases higher order aberrations, which leads to decreased visual quality.
Various methods to measure IOL misalignments have been described. Studies assessing the IOL position have used subjective grading methods at the slit lamp examination or a Scheimpflug camera 2 to assess IOL decentration and tilt. The subjective grading at the slitlamp may display considerable variability between examiners. This method is more qualitative than quantitative and does not allow fine resolution when reporting IOL tilt. The fact that the patient has no standardized target to focus on makes the method even less reliable. Scanning methods such as Scheimpflug photos require a very well dilated pupil exceeding 6mm to assess the IOL position. Additionally, it can be difficult to identify the anatomical structures of the eye that need to be used as points of reference. 3 Scheimpflug camera images have been used for assessing IOL tilt previously, but erroneous results, often due to corneal magnification, have diminished their widespread use. Another possibility to assess tilt is the use of Purkinje reflexes. The light reflections of Purkinje images at ocular surfaces to evaluate ocular alignment have recently been utilized. Since light is reflected at all interfaces of media with a difference in refractive index, these reflections, called Purkinje images, can be used to assess tilt and decentration of IOLs. Two different clinically applicable Purkinjemeter system provide the measurement of IOL decentration and tilt. The main problem with Purkinje meters is accessibility, as there are only a few prototypes available worldwide.
The most recently developed method for tilt quantification is the use of optical coherence tomography. This method has several advantages compared to the previous methods: OCT based devices are available in most clinics, the resolution of modern OCT devices is high, and the measurements are reproducible.
Due to the fact that tilt has an influence on visual quality, the prediction of the post-operative tilt could improve IOL power calculation significantly, especially for toric IOLs. In the literature, the prediction of tilt was shown to be acceptable for the orientation of tilt, but not for the amount of tilt. Furthermore, there is disagreement concerning the fact, if the amount of tilt increases or decreases after cataract surgery. Aim of this study is to measure tilt with two modern OCT based devices and one Scheimpflug camera and to predict the post-operative tilt using partial least squares regression. This method was developed by Wold and introduced to ophthalmology previously.
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: preoperation visit and 8 weeks postoperation visit
difference between preoperative amount of tilt in degrees and postoperative tilt in degrees
Time frame: pre operation visit and 8 weeks post operation visit
differnece between preoperative orientation of tilt in degrees and postoperative orientation of tilt in degrees
Time frame: pre operation visit and 8 weeks post operation visit
axial eye length in mm
Time frame: pre operation visit and 8 weeks post operation visit
anterior chamber depth in mm
Time frame: pre operation visit and 8 weeks post operation visit
anterior segment (epithelium of the cornea to posterior lens capsule) in mm
Time frame: pre operation visit and 8 weeks post operation visit
lens thickness in mm
Time frame: pre operation visit and 8 weeks post operation visit
estimated lens diameter in mm
Time frame: pre operation visit and 8 weeks post operation visit
shape of factor of the lens in mm
Time frame: pre operation visit and 8 weeks post operation visit
corneal radii in mm
Time frame: pre operation visit and 8 weeks post operation visit
age in years
Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Other
Predicting Post-operative Intraocular Lens Tilt Using Optical Coherence Tomography Measurements and Partial Least Squares Regression Modelling
Acronym: Tilt
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07735000
Age Related Cataract, Cataract
Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07605260
Cataract, Eye Diseases
Islamabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT06428955
Cataract, Eye Diseases
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06111222
Cataract, Eye Diseases
Heidelberg, Germany
View Trial Details