Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03413657

Predicting Fluid Responsiveness Using Transiently Increased Intrathoracic Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

The goal of this study is to identify in patients requiring active fluid resuscitation and mechanical ventilation for circulatory shock, can a controlled increase in intrathoracic pressure (either by positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) or tidal volume (TV)) predict responsiveness to additional fluid resuscitation.

We hypothesize that a temporary, physiologically-safe increase in positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) and/or a temporary increase in tidal volume (from 6 cc/kg predicted body weight (PBW) to 8 cc/kg PBW) in patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation will predict fluid responsiveness based upon an assessment of the change in pulse pressure and stroke volume variation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of California, Davis

Sacramento, California, 95817, United States

About this study

Once an eligible subject is identified and written or telephone consent is obtained from the patient or surrogate as appropriate, we will record demographic data and clinical information including age, sex, height, actual body weight, predicted body weight (PBW), APACHE II on admission, primary diagnosis, reason for ICU admission, and dose of vasopressors.

Patients will be intubated and on assist-control volume ventilation receiving low tidal volumes. Sedation will be titrated per current MICU protocol to minimize patient discomfort and minimizing ventilator dyssynchrony. In keeping with standard practice, the dose of vasoactive medications will be kept constant during the intervention period. The standard practice is to titrate vasopressor therapy every five minutes, so keeping vasoactive medications constant for sixty seconds is in keeping with the standard of care. All subjects will be in an ICU setting and monitored per standard of care (vital signs, telemetry, ventilator data) by a respiratory therapist, pulmonary and critical care fellow or faculty member, and critical care nurse at the bedside throughout the entire intervention.

A point of care (POC) echocardiogram will be performed by the investigator performing the intervention in order to measure the stroke volume index (surrogate for cardiac output).

Subjects will be randomized to either undergo the PEEP challenge or tidal volume challenge first. After the initial challenge, subjects will cross over to whichever challenge has not yet been performed.

The simple changes to the ventilator we are proposing to use as challenges in this study are done frequently and routinely in the ICU with or without the supervision of a physician, but we will have a physician present throughout the entire proposed intervention. For the subjects undergoing PEEP challenge first, we will do the following:

  • POC echocardiogram performed to measure SVI
  • The tidal volume will be set to 6 mL/kg PBW and the patients will be monitored for 5 minutes for any variability in vital parameters. The subject's ventilatory parameters, vitals, hemodynamics, and oxygenation will be recorded on initial ventilator settings.
  • PEEP challenge - PEEP will be increased by 50% for 60 seconds. The subject's ventilatory parameters, vitals, hemodynamics, and oxygenation will be recorded after 60 seconds.
  • PEEP returned to initial settings.
  • 2 minute washout period to prepare for tidal volume challenge.
  • Tidal volume challenge - tidal volume raised to 8 cc/kg PBW for 60 seconds. The subject's ventilatory parameters, vitals, hemodynamics, and oxygenation will be recorded will be recorded after 60 seconds.
  • Subjects ventilator settings returned to initial settings x 2 minutes.
  • 500 cc crystalloid fluid bolus of the ICU team's choosing is then administered to the patient. The subject's ventilatory parameters, vitals, hemodynamics, and oxygenation will be measured.
  • POC echocardiogram performed to measure SVI and determine if the subject is a fluid responder or non-responder.

The procedure for those randomized into the tidal volume challenge first will be similar, but the tidal volume challenge (e, above), rather than the PEEP challenge (b, above), will be performed first.

In the management of a critically ill patient in circulatory shock, physicians encounter the question of whether to administer fluid to the patient or not several times during the course of the patient's stay in the ICU. To ensure that our study is generalizable and applicable, we will perform the above protocol up to three times per subject. This is similar to previous studies using changes in intrathoracic pressure to predict fluid responsiveness. Additionally, we will have a larger number of interventions in order to better show a clear difference statistically.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Mechanically ventilated
  • Identified by treatment team as requiring intravenous fluid bolus
  • Acute circulatory failure during admission (systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≤90 mmHg or mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≤70 mmHg or requiring vasopressors to maintain SBP >90 mmHg or MAP >70 mmHg, along with one or more of the following:
  • urinary flow ≤0.5 mL/kg/min for ≥2 hours,
  • heart rate ≥100 beats per minute
  • presence of skin mottling
  • blood lactate concentration ≥4 mmol/L

Exclusion criteria

  • Contraindication to fluid bolus
  • Assynchrony Index > 10%
  • Clinically significant cardiac arrhythmia
  • Severe valvular heart disease
  • Chest tubes with air leak
  • Abdominal compartment syndrome
  • Pregnancy
  • Concurrent nebulized medication or inhaled nitric oxide
  • Transthoracic echogenicity unsuitable for measuring velocity-time integral of aortic blood flow (SVI)
  • Prisoner
  • Clinical brain death
  • PEEP > 15 cmH2O

Treatment and study plan

Increase in intrathoracic pressure

Procedure

Will transiently increase intrathoracic pressure for 60 seconds and monitor for changes in hemodynamics during this time.

Other names: PEEP Challenge, Tidal Volume Challenge

Primary outcomes

  1. Pulse Pressure Variation

    Time frame: Following 60 seconds of intrathoracic pressure challenge

    Temporary increase in intrathoracic pressure (PEEP or TV) will predict fluid responsiveness using an absolute increase in pulse pressure variation by 3% or more.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Heart Rate

    Time frame: Following 60 seconds of intrathoracic pressure challenge

    Temporary increase in intrathoracic pressure (PEEP or TV) will predict fluid responsiveness using an absolute decrease in heart rate by 15 beats per minute or more.

  2. Mean Arterial Pressure

    Time frame: Following 60 seconds of intrathoracic pressure challenge

    Temporary increase in intrathoracic pressure (PEEP or TV) will predict fluid responsiveness using an absolute decrease in MAP by 15 mmHg or more.

  3. Mortality

    Time frame: 7 days

    Differences in 7 day mortality between fluid responders and non-responders

  4. Stroke Volume Variation

    Time frame: Following 60 seconds of intrathoracic pressure challenge

    Temporary increase in intrathoracic pressure (PEEP or TV) will predict fluid responsiveness using an absolute increase in SVV of 4% or more.

  5. End-tidal carbon dioxide

    Time frame: Following 60 seconds of intrathoracic pressure challenge

    Temporary increase in intrathoracic pressure (PEEP or TV) will predict fluid responsiveness using an increase in EtCO2 by 4% or more.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of California, Davis

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Jan 29, 2018
Registry last updated
Jan 18, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.