Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06066502

Precision Ventilation vs Standard Care for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

The goal of this interventional study is to compare standard mechanical ventilation to a lung-stress oriented ventilation strategy in patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Participants will be ventilated according to one of two different strategies. The main question the study hopes to answer is whether the personalized ventilation strategy helps improve survival.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

ARDS is a devastating condition that places a heavy burden on public health resources. Recent changes in the practice of mechanical ventilation have improved survival in ARDS, but mortality remains unacceptably high.

This application is for support of a phase III multi-centered, randomized controlled trial of mechanical ventilation, directed by driving pressure and esophageal manometry, in patients with ARDS. The primary hypothesis is that precise ventilator titration to maintain lung stress within 0-12 centimeters of water (cm H2O), the normal physiological range experienced during relaxed breathing, will improve 60-day mortality, compared to guided usual care.

Specific Aim 1: To determine the effect on mortality of the precision ventilation strategy, compared to guided usual care, in patients with ARDS.

  • Hypothesis 1: The precision ventilation strategy will decrease 60-day mortality (primary trial endpoint).

Specific Aim 2: To evaluate the effects on lung injury of the precision ventilation strategy, compared to guided usual care, in patients with ARDS.

  • Hypothesis 2a: The precision ventilation strategy will improve clinical pulmonary recovery, defined using the composite endpoint alive and ventilator-free (AVF).
  • Hypothesis 2b: The precision ventilation strategy will attenuate alveolar epithelial injury.

Specific Aim 3: To evaluate the hemodynamic safety profile of the precision ventilation strategy, compared to guided usual care, in patients with ARDS.

  • Hypothesis 3: The precision ventilation strategy will decrease hemodynamic instability, measured as shock-free days through Day 14.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Ventilator-dependent ARDS, with all of the following (a-e):
  • Invasive ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ≥ 8 cm H2O or FiO2 ≥ 0.5
  • Hypoxemia as characterized by: • If arterial blood gas (ABG) available: the partial pressure of oxygen in the arterial blood (PaO2)/FiO2 ≤ 300 mm Hg, or, • if ABG not available OR overt clinical deterioration in oxygenation since last ABG: SpO2/FiO2 ≤ 316 with SpO2 ≤ 97% (both conditions) on two representative assessments between 1 to 6 hours apart. • If patient is positioned prone or receiving inhaled pulmonary vasodilator at time of screening:

Qualifying PaO2/FiO2 or SpO2/FiO2 (as defined above) that was recorded within the 6 hours immediately prior to initiating either of these therapies may be used for eligibility determination. • If PEEP has been increased by > 5 cm H2O within the last 12 hours immediately prior to screening:

Qualifying PaO2/FiO2 or SpO2/FiO2 (as defined above) prior to PEEP increase may be used for eligibility determination if recorded within this 12-hour window.

  • Bilateral lung opacities on chest imaging not fully explained by effusions, lobar collapse, or nodules
  • Respiratory failure not fully explained by heart failure or fluid overload
  • Onset within 1 week of clinical insult or new/worsening symptoms
  • Early in ARDS course
  • Full criteria for ARDS (#2 above) first met within previous 3 days
  • Current invasive ventilation episode not more than 4 days duration
  • Current severe hypoxemic episode (receipt of invasive ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, or high-flow nasal cannula) not more than 10 days duration

Exclusion criteria

  • Esophageal manometry already in use clinically
  • Severe brain injury: including suspected elevated intracranial pressure, cerebral edema, or Glasgow coma score (GCS) ≤ 8 directly caused by severe brain injury (e.g., ischemia or hemorrhage)
  • Gross barotrauma or chest tube inserted to treat barotrauma (note: chest tube inserted strictly for drainage of pleural effusion is not an exclusion)
  • Esophageal pathology that, in judgement of the site investigator, significantly increases risk of esophageal catheter placement, including high-risk esophageal varices, recent oropharyngeal or gastroesophageal surgery; or past esophagectomy
  • Ongoing severe coagulopathy (platelet < 5000/μL or INR > 4)
  • Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or CO2 removal (ECCO2R)
  • Neuromuscular disease that impairs spontaneous breathing (including but not limited to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, spinal cord injury at C5 or above)
  • Any of the following severe chronic lung diseases: cystic fibrosis, acute bronchiectasis exacerbation, acute exacerbation of a chronic interstitial lung disease (ILD), chronic pulmonary hypertension (PH) on PH-targeted vasoactive medication, or lung transplant
  • End-stage chronic cirrhosis with Child-Pugh Class C (Section 12.3)
  • ICU admission for burn injury
  • Current ICU stay > 2 weeks or acute care hospital stay > 4 weeks
  • Moribund patient not expected to survive 24 hours as assessed by the study physician; if cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was provided, assessment for moribund status must occur at least 6 hours after CPR was completed
  • Current limitation on life-sustaining care (other than do-not-resuscitate), or expectation by clinical team that a limitation on life-sustained care will be adopted within next 24 hours.
  • Treating clinician refusal or unwilling to use protocol-specified ventilator settings/modes
  • Prisoner
  • Previous enrollment in this trial

Treatment and study plan

Precision ventilation

Other

The intervention arm prioritizes mitigation of ventilator-induced-lung-injury by individualizing support to patient-specific mechanics in an integrated approach to limit overdistension and atelectrauma. This is accomplished in this arm by titration of tidal volume to limitation of driving pressure at 12 centimeters of water (cmH2O) or less and using esophageal manometry to titrate PEEP to a transpulmonary pressure of 0 cmH2O with adjustments in respiratory rate to allow for permissive hypercapnia and FiO2 adjustments to assure adequate oxygenation.

Guided usual care ventilation

Other

The comparison arm allows clinician discretion when titrating PEEP and tidal volume, while setting general targets for allowable PEEP/FiO2 combinations, target range for SpO2, and target range for tidal volume. This arm applies routine best-practice guidelines. This includes maintenance of tidal volumes of 6-8 cc/kg of ideal body weight, limiting plateau pressures to 30 cmH2O or less and application of PEEP-FiO2 combinations which include a wide range of typical usual care with esophageal manometry only for data collection and not clinical adjustment.

Primary outcomes

  1. 60-day mortality

    Time frame: 60 days from randomization

    All-cause, all-location mortality

Secondary outcomes

  1. 28-day mortality

    Time frame: 28 days from randomization

    All-cause, all-location mortality

  2. Alive and ventilator-free through 28 days

    Time frame: 28 days from randomization

    A composite outcome that incorporates survival for the defined follow-up interval and time to successful liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) among survivors.

  3. Alive and Respiratory Support-Free

    Time frame: 28 days from randomization

    A composite outcome that incorporates survival for the defined follow-up interval and time to successful liberation from advanced respiratory support among survivors. Advanced respiratory support is defined in Section 1.2. This outcome will be formulated as a win ratio and separately as a time-to-event competing risk endpoint.

  4. Barotrauma through Day 14

    Time frame: 14 days from randomization

    Any occurrence of pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, subcutaneous emphysema, or chest tube insertion for barotrauma through Day 14 or until successful liberation from IMV, whichever occurs first.

Other outcomes

  1. Hemodynamic Instability Index through Hour 4 and daily through Day 7

    Time frame: From hour 4 through Day 7 from randomization

    A hemodynamic instability index will be computed per a six-level ordinal scale

  2. Shock-free days through Day 28

    Time frame: 28 days from randomization

    The number of days, regardless of consecutiveness, during which vasopressors have not been administered for at least 1 uninterrupted hour, through Day 28.

  3. Renal failure-free days through Day 28

    Time frame: 28 days from randomization

    The number of days between successful liberation from renal replacement therapy and Day 28.

  4. Refractory hypoxemia through Day 14

    Time frame: 14 days from randomization

    Any occurrence of SpO2 < 88% continuously for at least 30 minutes' duration despite valid pulse-oximetry waveform and protocol-directed ventilatory support, through Day 28 or until successful liberation from IMV, whichever occurs first.

  5. Refractory acidemia through Day 14

    Time frame: 14 days from randomization

    Any occurrence of arterial pH < 7.15 on two consecutive measures at least 30 minutes apart despite protocol-directed ventilatory support, through Day 28 or until successful liberation from IMV, whichever occurs first.

  6. Daily Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) through Day 7

    Time frame: 7 days from randomization

    SOFA will be computed daily for live patients through Day 7, omitting Glasgow Coma Scale element.

  7. ICU length of stay

    Time frame: 60 days

    Number of days in the ICU from enrollment until the last transfer out of ICU, hospital discharge, death, or Day 60, whichever occurs first. The "last day" method will be used: if a participant leaves the ICU but is then transferred back into the ICU during the same hospitalization within the 60-day follow up period, the brief time interval outside the ICU will count toward ICU length of stay.

  8. Hospital length of stay

    Time frame: 60 days

    Number of days in the hospital from enrollment until hospital discharge, death, or Day 60, whichever occurs first.

  9. Alveolar epithelial injury biomarkers

    Time frame: 2 days from randomization

    The change in plasma levels of Plasma Soluble Receptor for Advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE) and surfactant protein D (SP-D) will be compared between baseline and Day 2.

  10. Pro-fibrosis biomarkers

    Time frame: 2 days from randomization

    The change in plasma levels of Plasma procollagen-III N-terminal peptide (P3NP) and matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP7) will be compared between baseline and Day 2.

  11. Endothelial barrier function biomarkers

    Time frame: 2 days from randomization

    The change in plasma levels of Plasma angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (VEGFR1, also known as FLT1) will be compared between baseline and Day 2.

  12. Inflammatory biomarkers

    Time frame: 2 days from randomization

    The change in plasma levels of Plasma interleukin-6 (IL6) and interleukin-8 (IL8) will be compared between baseline and Day 2.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Nancy Ringwood, RN

CONTACT

[email protected]

617-724-9836

Valerie Goodspeed, MPH

CONTACT

[email protected]

6176328055

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Other

Collaborators

  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • NYU Langone Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Registry information

Official study title

PREcision VENTilation to Attenuate Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury: A Phase 3 Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

Acronym: PREVENT VILI

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2030
Study completion
2030
First posted
Oct 4, 2023
Registry last updated
Jun 29, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.