Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07512154
This is a research study to determine if a novel molecular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique, called amide proton transfer (APT) imaging, is useful in identifying the most aggressive areas of tumor needed for radiotherapy of brain tumors.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Despite advances in therapy, glioblastoma remains almost universally fatal, with a high rate of local failure and a median survival of < 2 years. The standard of care for GBM is maximum safe surgical resection, followed by radiotherapy (RT) with temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy, which was established two decades ago. There is an urgent need to optimize each step of this standard therapy and develop new methods to fight this devastating disease. It is the infiltrative nature of GBM that limits resection and leads to suboptimal RT planning. To address this, neurosurgeons are employing supratotal resection, in which gadolinium-enhancing macroscopic tumor plus 1-2 cm extension into gadolinium-non-enhancing peritumoral regions is resected after preserving the highly eloquent region.
RT planning is complex and varies among medical centers, particularly in terms of inclusion of non-enhancing peritumoral regions in the clinical target volume. Moreover, lack of local therapy intensification of RT is considered one of the factors that prevent this standard therapy from achieving maximal tumor control. New RT approaches, such as focused dose escalation and proton therapy, require the best possible imaging methods to accurately visualize the extent of the tumor. Furthermore, standard structural MRI cannot distinguish between treatment effect from RT and tumor progression. Notably, the treated tumor may have progressed during fractionated RT, and the newly emerging active lesion could be missed from the original RT planning, particularly at the boost phase. New tissue-specific imaging approaches, like amide proton transfer (APT) imaging, that can accurately identify the tumor burden before, during, and after RT treatment are urgently needed.
The investigators central hypothesis in this highly innovative and clinically significant study is that protein-based APT-MRI is capable of identifying a precise high-protein tumor hotspot inside and outside Gd-enhancing regions with which to guide radiation dose escalation to high-risk active tumor and to facilitate an adaptive strategy to regions of therapeutic resistance during RT.
The innovative APT-RT technique developed by the investigators at Johns Hopkins enables a personalized RT regimen with precise dose escalation in high-risk tumor regions and response-adapted dose escalation in therapeutically resistant lesions in the boost phase, which could decrease the local recurrence rate. Personalized local therapy intensification would achieve maximal tumor control and improve the survival for GBM patients. The investigator's preliminary study will lay the foundation for a more definitive phase-II prospective clinical trial to assess the impact of APT imaging on RT guidance with regard to outcomes, including overall and progression-free survival, complications, toxicity, and quality of life. The investigators expect that APT-RT should be more effective for tumor control than the current conventional therapy.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
New APT-RT regimen
Other names: APT-RT
Standard two-phase RT
Other names: RT
Time frame: From baseline to 4 weeks post completion of RT.
A reduction in APTw signal following treatment suggests a positive response to therapy (active tumor APTw = 3-4% vs. necrosis/no tumor APTw 1-2%). A 1% greater reduction in mean APTw signal change within the Gd-enhancing tumor region from baseline (pre-RT) to post-RT in the APT-RT arm, compared to the control arm.
Time frame: Randomization up to 2 years post completion of RT.
Overall survival will be measured for each patient from randomization to the date of death.
Time frame: From randomization up to 2 years post completion of RT.
Progression free survival will be measured for each patient from randomization to the date of progressive disease or death, whichever occurs first. The definition of progression will be based on RANO criteria.
Time frame: Baseline, Treatment weeks 1 - 6, Follow-ups: 6 month, 12 month, 24 month
All patients who receive any amount of RT will be evaluable for toxicity. CTCAE version 5 will be used to record grade 3 or greater neurologic toxicity.
Time frame: Baseline, Treatment weeks 1 - 6, Follow-ups: 6 month, 12 month, 24 month
All patients who receive any amount of RT will be evaluable for toxicity. RTOG/EORTC acute and late radiation morbidity score will be used to record grade 3 or greater neurologic toxicity.
Time frame: Baseline (≤21 days before starting RT), 1 month follow-up (≤10 days prior to cycle 1 of adjuvant TMZ), and every 6 months (+/- 1 month) up to 2 years from completion of RT.
EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30/Brain Cancer Module-20 (EORTCQLQ30/BN20) will be recorded for each patient. Score range 0-100. higher score, better quality of life. In case of disease progression within 2 years of cycle 1, patients will be re-tested for the final time only if previous assessment was >3 months from date of progression.
Time frame: Baseline (≤21 days before starting RT), 1 month follow-up (≤10 days prior to cycle 1 of adjuvant TMZ), and every 6 months (+/- 1 month) up to 2 years from completion of RT.
M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor Module (MDASI-BT) will be recorded for each patient. Score ranges from 0 (best condition) to 10 (worst condition) In case of disease progression within 2 years of cycle 1, patients will be re-tested for the final time only if previous assessment was >3 months from date of progression.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Kristin Redmond
CONTACT
Ryan Manuel
CONTACT
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06991101
Astrocytoma, Brain Cancer
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07416188
Astrocytoma, Brain Cancer
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07326566
Astrocytoma, Brain Cancer
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07493447
Acoustic Neuroma, Astrocytoma
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial Details