Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria de Málaga
Málaga, 29010, Spain
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Amparo Zamora-Mogollo, MSc
CONTACT
Juan Miguel Gómez-Palomo, Dr, PhD
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT07212777
This study is a randomized clinical trial that will compare two surgical techniques for patients with knee osteoarthritis and varus deformity who are candidates for medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. The goal is to evaluate whether using patient-specific 3D-printed surgical guides improves the accuracy of the bone cut compared with the conventional technique performed with anatomical landmarks and fluoroscopy.
A total of 50 adult patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: conventional osteotomy or osteotomy assisted by patient-specific instrumentation (PSI). The main outcome is the accuracy of the osteotomy cut, measured by comparing preoperative planning with the postoperative CT scan. Secondary outcomes include leg alignment, surgical time, radiation exposure, complications, and functional recovery assessed with validated questionnaires (KOOS, WOMAC, IKDC, EQ-5D) and gait analysis using depth cameras.
Patients will be followed for up to 12 months after surgery to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Málaga, 29010, Spain
Location status: Recruiting
Amparo Zamora-Mogollo, MSc
CONTACT
Juan Miguel Gómez-Palomo, Dr, PhD
CONTACT
Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy is a well-established surgical procedure to correct knee alignment in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis and varus deformity. The accuracy of the bone cut is critical for surgical success. However, conventional techniques performed with anatomical landmarks and fluoroscopy may result in variability and suboptimal correction.
Recent advances in 3D imaging and printing allow the creation of patient-specific surgical guides designed from preoperative CT scans. These guides may improve the accuracy and reproducibility of the osteotomy.
This single-center randomized clinical trial will include 50 adult patients, randomly assigned to undergo conventional osteotomy or osteotomy assisted by patient-specific instrumentation. The main outcome is the accuracy of the osteotomy cut compared with preoperative planning. Secondary outcomes include leg alignment, surgical efficiency, radiation exposure, complications, and functional recovery. Patients will be followed for 12 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Medial Open Wedge Hight Tibial Osteotomy using 3D printed patient-specific instrumentation as a guide for the osteotomy
Conventional Medial Open Wedge Hight Tibial Osteotomy
Time frame: Immediate postoperative period
Difference between planned and executed angles in AP and lateral planes
Time frame: Immediate postoperative period
Difference between planned and executed distance between osteotomy cut and and joint line
Time frame: Immediate postoperative period
Difference between planned and achieved hip-knee-ankle angle
Time frame: Immediate postoperative period
Difference between planned and achieved tibial slope
Time frame: Day of surgery
Duration from skin incision to closure
Time frame: Day of surgery
Total intraoperative fluoroscopy shots
Time frame: Day of surgery
Cumulative radiation exposure during surgery (mGy)
Time frame: Day of surgery
Events such as hinge fracture or neurovascular injury
Time frame: From surgery to end of 12 month follow-up
Infection, delayed bone healing, thrombotic events
Time frame: From surgery to end of 12 month follow-up
Need for additional surgical intervention
Time frame: From surgery to end of 12 month follow-up
Time to full weight-bearing without assistance
Time frame: From surgery until the end of the 12 month follow-up
Time to radiographic evidence of bone healing
Time frame: From surgery until the end of the 12 month follow-up
Time it takes the patient to perform 5 sit to stands
Time frame: From surgery until the end of the 12 month follow-up
Range 0-10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Time frame: Immediate postoperative period
Precision of the alignment of the knee with respect tot he planned osteotomy
Time frame: From surgery until the end of the 12 month follow-up
Time that it takes the patient to stand up from a chair and walk 10 meters, turn 180º and return to the starting position
Time frame: From surgery to end of 12 month follow-up
The balance component of the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) assesses the ability to maintain three standing positions: feet together, semi-tandem, and tandem stand, each for up to 10 seconds. The test is scored from 0 to 4, where 0 = unable to hold any position, and 4 = able to hold the tandem position for 10 seconds. Higher scores indicate better balance performance.
Time frame: From surgery to end of 12 month follow-up
Each subscale scored from 0-100, where 0 = extreme problems and 100 = no problems. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
Time frame: From surgery to end of 12 month follow-up
Score range 0-100, where 0 = worst knee function and 100 = no limitations. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
Time frame: From surgery to end of 12 month follow-up
Scored 0-96, where higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness, and physical function.
Time frame: From surgery to end of 12 month follow-up
Index score range usually from -0.59 (worst health state) to 1 (perfect health); higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Time frame: From surgery to end of 12 month follow-up
Patient-reported questionnaire that measures lower limb functional status. It consists of 25 items scored as "yes" (1 point), "sometimes" (0.5 points), or "no" (0 points). The raw score is summed and converted to a percentage (0-100). Higher scores indicate greater disability, while lower scores indicate better functional status. Ranges from 0-100. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: From surgery to end of 12 month follow-up
Patient-reported questionnaire assessing foot health across several domains: pain, function, footwear, and general foot health. Each domain score is transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate better foot health and function. Range: 0-100 for each domain. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: From surgery to end of 12 month follow-up
Patient-reported measure assessing foot pain, disability, and activity limitation. Contains 23 items scored on a visual analog scale (0-10). The total score is normalized to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate greater pain, disability, and activity limitation. Range: 0-100. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Amparo Zamora-Mogollo
CONTACT
Juan Miguel Gómez Palomo, PhD
CONTACT
University of Malaga
Other
Precisión de la osteotomía Tibial Proximal Con Instrumental Paciente-específico vs técnica Convencional
Acronym: AMBE_OR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06709703
Arthritis, Arthritis (Knee)
View Trial DetailsNCT01345123
Arthritis, Arthritis (Hip)
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00005909
Alkaptonuria, Amino Acid Metabolism, Inborn Errors
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00024479
Arthritis, Connective Tissue Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details