Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05254795

Precision Medicine Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Molecular Tumor Board Assisted Care to Usual Care

This trial will compare Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) assisted care to usual care for patients who have newly diagnosed histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIb-IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and are planning to undergo treatment for their cancer.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–120 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Kentucky

Lexington, Kentucky, 40506, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinically suspected or histologically confirmed stage IIb-IV NSCLC who are planning to undergo treatment
  • No prior systemic therapies for NSCLC, with the exception of adjuvant therapy for early stage NSCLC. Prior surgery and/or radiation is allowed.
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.

Exclusion criteria

  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with targeted therapy, in the opinion of the treating physician.
  • Pregnancy

Treatment and study plan

Molecular tumor board assisted care

Other

Participants in this group will obtain recommendations for care from the molecular tumor board.

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall survival

    Time frame: 1 year

    Overall survival 1 year survival between individuals with stage IIb-IV NSCLC who receive MTB assisted care to those who receive usual care.

  2. Change in quality of life (QOL)

    Time frame: At enrollment, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks.

    Quality of life will be assessed via the FACT-L (The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung). FACT-L has 5 areas of measurement: physical wellbeing, social/family wellbeing, emotional wellbeing, functional wellbeing, and an additional concerns list of problems specific to lung cancer. Areas are measured on a 5-point Likert-type scale of 0-4. The FACT-L subscales can be scored to yield a total score, subscale scores, as well as the Trial Outcome Index (TOI), which reflects the physical wellbeing, functional wellbeing, and lung cancer symptom subscales. TOI scores range from 0-84, with a higher score reflecting better QOL. Total FACT-G scores (physical, social, emotional, and functional wellbeing subscales) range from 0-108, with higher scores reflecting better QOL. The lung cancer subscale (i.e., additional concerns subscale) can range from 0-28 (only 7 items are scored), with higher scores reflecting better QOL.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall survival

    Time frame: 1 year

    Comparison of overall survival between individuals with stage IIb-IV NSCLC who receive MTB assisted care to those who receive usual care

  2. Change in guideline concordant care

    Time frame: 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and 1 year

    Comparison of guideline concordant care (specifically receiving next generation sequencing (NGS) testing and treatments based on identified mutations) between individuals with stage IIb-IV NSCLC who receive MTB assisted care to those who receive usual care.

  3. Change in satisfaction with treatment

    Time frame: At enrollment, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks.

    To compare satisfaction with treatment between individuals with stage IIb-IV NSCLC who receive MTB assisted care to those who receive usual care, including financial, psychosocial, and physical measures of satisfaction using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) - Treatment Satisfaction - General (TSG) (version 4). The FACIT-TSG is an 8-item questionnaire, with each item score ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("very much"). Total scores range from 0 to 32 with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with treatment.

Other outcomes

  1. Association of ctDNA variant allele frequency

    Time frame: 1 year

    To determine the association of ctDNA variant allele frequency with 1 year overall survival

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Timothy Mullett

Other

Collaborators

  • Eli Lilly and Company

Registry information

Acronym: PRiMAL

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Feb 24, 2022
Registry last updated
Mar 6, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.