Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04717323

Precision Gait Retraining for Children With Cerebral Palsy

This project will develop the first sensor-based mobile Pelvic Assist Device (mPAD) that can deliver precise, adaptable, pelvic control to restore natural coordination of upper- and lower-limb movements during gait in children with Cerebral Palsy

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

6 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Altec Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Gait impairments hinder mobility for more than 760,000 children and adults living with cerebral palsy (CP) in the US. Motor relearning is possible for these individual but typically requires numerous training sessions with a team of physical therapists and assistants to restore coupling between upper- and lower-body segments while assisting spastic uncoordinated limb movement to improve gait kinematics. This clinical trial will meet the overall objective of testing the feasibility of developing a smart-robotic exoskeleton that is effective at providing guided pelvic assistance and support while biofeedback mediated training is facilitated under the supervision of a physiotherapist. The project will test a novel tethered Pelvic Assist Device (TPAD) with integratable electromyographic (EMG) and inertial (IMU) biofeedback that is uniquely capable of delivering precise, adaptable, multi-degree-of-freedom pelvic control to promote natural intersegmental coupling, restore coordination of upper- and lower-limb movement, and improve normal gait kinematics in children with CP. Because of its proximity to the center of mass and critical role in coordinating upper- and lower-limb control, the pelvis provides an ideal access point for physiotherapists to manually improve gait. The investigators will test the hypothesis that accurate sensor-based metrics of gait can be derived from EMG and IMU wearable sensors to develop a biofeedback system for motor learning that are integratable with TPAD to develop a new mobile mPAD device that is compliant with the target population.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

(children with CP):

  • Children (6-18 years of age)
  • Male or Female
  • Confirmed diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy by a neurologist;
  • CT or MRI imaging consistent with clinical presentation;
  • Clinical evidence of preserved cognition as determined by the child's neurologist;
  • Clinical evidence of Mild to Moderate spastic (pyramidal) diplegia as determined by the child's neurologist;
  • Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFS) GMFCS Level II ("walks with limitations. Limitations include walking long distances and balancing, but not as able as Level I to run or jump; may require use of mobility devices when first learning to walk, usually prior to age 4; and may rely on wheeled mobility equipment when outside of home for traveling long distances."
  • Spasticity being controlled by pharmaceutical or surgical correction; or has Modified Ashworth scale (MAS) = 0-2 ("More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion (ROM), but affected part(s) easily moved
  • Ambulatory without assistive devices (except for long distances or on uneven terrain).
  • No allergies to skin tape such as Band-Aid.

Exclusion criteria

(children with CP):

  • Inability to follow simple instructions in English, or through a Spanish-speaking translator;
  • Medical history of other neurological conditions;
  • Medical history of cardiac or respiratory complications, or disorders that would place the subject at risk for conducting the different motor activities;
  • Contractures present in lower limb - evaluated based on Tardieu Scale test where joint range of motion is measured during slow velocity movements and where contracture is operationally defined as being present if the angle at the end of range is 5 -10 degrees less than full range at ankle; and 5 -20 degrees less than full range at hip and knee.
  • Skin disorders that result in open lesions or hyper-sensitive/fragile skin, preventing the use of medical-grade adhesive tapes to secure the sensors to the skin;
  • Unable to provide Informed Consent from subject and Assent from parent or guardian using English or Spanish-translation informed consent form.

Inclusion criteria

(healthy volunteers):

  • Adults or Children (age≥6 y.o.)
  • Male or Female;
  • Able to walk independently and without assistive devices;
  • No history of musculoskeletal or neurological disorders;
  • Able to follow directions in English.

Exclusion criteria

(healthy volunteers):

  • Non-English speaker;
  • Unable to walk independently and without assistive devices;
  • Medical history of neurological or musculoskeletal conditions (arthritis, spondylosis, etc.);
  • Inability to follow simple instructions;
  • Unable to provide informed consent in English.

Treatment and study plan

mPAD (or TPAD) Pelvic Assist Device

Device

Gait retraining device that applies pelvic forces and measures response

Other names: mPAD (or TPAD)

No Intervention

Device

Gait with no pelvic assistance

Primary outcomes

  1. Gait Metric Accuracy

    Time frame: 1 day

    Measures the accuracy of identifying heel strike and toe off timing in % error when comparing measures from wearable sensors vs. motion capture

  2. Pelvis Range of Motion During Walking

    Time frame: 1 day

    Difference (in degrees) between pelvis range of motion during walking as detected by wearable sensors and motion capture

  3. Muscle Activation During Walking

    Time frame: 1 day

    Measures electromyographic (EMG) signals of trunk and lower limb muscles during gait which are necessary for designing and implementing a mobile pelvic assist device (mPAD) system with biofeedback

  4. Rating of Perceived Difficulty

    Time frame: 1 day

    Structured interviews will be used to grade the perception of difficulty in using the technology

  5. Trunk Range of Motion During Walking

    Time frame: 1 day

    Difference (in degrees) between trunk range of motion during walking as detected by wearable sensors and motion capture

  6. Hip Range of Motion During Walking

    Time frame: 1 day

    Difference (in degrees) between hip range of motion during walking as detected by wearable sensors and motion capture

  7. Knee Range of Motion During Walking

    Time frame: 1 day

    Difference (in degrees) between knee range of motion during walking as detected by wearable sensors and motion capture

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Altec Inc.

Industry

Collaborators

  • Columbia University

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Jan 22, 2021
Registry last updated
Mar 4, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.