Dilation 60-Fr non stricture
ProcedureDilation of patients with subjective dysphagia and normal endoscopy
NCT Number: NCT04542551
The purpose of this study is to better understand the role of a technique called esophageal dilation in patients who complain of trouble swallowing. In patients with esophageal stricture we want to determine if the size of the esophageal dilator makes a difference in symptoms and outcomes. In patients who do not have an obvious esophageal stricture we want to determine if esophageal dilation is an effective therapy in these patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Louisville VA Medical Center, Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Dilation of patients with subjective dysphagia and normal endoscopy
Sham dilator for patients with subjective dysphagia and normal endoscopy
Dilation of non severe stricture with 60-Fr dilator
Dilation of non severe stricture with 46-Fr dilator
Dilation of a severe stricture with 51-Fr dilator
Dilation of a severe stricture with 42-Fr dilator
Time frame: Baseline, every 8 weeks for 12 months
Evaluate the change in dysphagia (the dysphagia score is used to assess for severity of dysphagia, score ranges from 0 to 5 with the higher score indicates greater degree of severity) in patients without strictures undergoing empiric dilation.
Time frame: Baseline, every 8 weeks for 12 months
Evaluate the change in diet score (the diet score is used to assess the ability of the patient to tolerate food, score ranges from 0 to 5 with the higher score indicates inability to eat) in patients without strictures undergoing empiric dilation.
Time frame: Baseline, "every 8 weeks (for non severe stricture)" "every 4 weeks (for severe stricture)" for 12 months
Evaluate the change in dysphagia (the dysphagia score is used to assess for severity of dysphagia, score ranges from 0 to 5 with the higher score indicates greater degree of severity) in patients with strictures undergoing dilation with 60-Fr vs 46-Fr for non severe stricture, and 51-Fr vs 42-Fr for severe stricture.
Time frame: Baseline, "every 8 weeks (for non severe stricture)" "every 4 weeks (for severe stricture)" for 12 months
Evaluate the change in diet score (the diet score is used to assess the ability of the patient to tolerate food, score ranges from 0 to 5 with the higher score indicates inability to eat) in patients with strictures undergoing dilation with 60-Fr vs 46-Fr for non severe stricture, and 51-Fr vs 42-Fr for severe stricture.
Time frame: End of study (12 months)
Evaluate the number of patients in each study arm that achieve complete relief of dysphagia for the remainder of the study.
Time frame: End of study (12 months)
Evaluate the number of dilation sessions needed to achieve sustainable change in dysphagia and diet scores in patients with non-severe and severe stricture.
Time frame: Every 8 weeks (for non severe stricture)" "every 4 weeks (for severe stricture)" for 12 months
Evaluate the average duration between dilation sessions in patients undergoing dilation for non-severe and severe strictures.
Time frame: Every 8 weeks (for non severe stricture) and every 4 weeks (for severe stricture) for 1 year
Evaluate if more than 3 size reduction from target diameter is needed as a result of tactile resistance for subsequent dilation sessions in patients undergoing dilation for non-severe and severe stricture.
University of Louisville
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04569097
Deglutition Disorders, Digestive System Diseases
Hines, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00576134
Deglutition Disorders, Digestive System Diseases
Strasbourg, France
View Trial DetailsNCT02825927
Deglutition Disorders, Digestive System Diseases
Örebro, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT01873573
Deglutition Disorders, Digestive System Diseases
Tampa, Florida, United States
View Trial Details