Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD), Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT-D)
DevicePatients that are indicated for an ICD or CRT-D receive one of these devices.
NCT Number: NCT00311181
The objective of this study is to compare the ULV (Upper Limit of Vulnerability)/DFT (Defibrillation Threshold) efficacy between the 2.5, 3.5 and 4.5 ms membrane time constant based biphasic defibrillation waveforms. This comparison will result in identifying the optimal membrane time constant when programming the "tuned" defibrillation waveform.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Baptist Medical Center Montclair, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) continues to be a significant cause of cardiac mortality with annual deaths ranging from 250,000 to 400,000 in the United States. Accordingly, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD's) have proven to be an important therapeutic option for patients susceptible to SCD. Successful therapy and generator longevity are greatly dependent on proper defibrillation threshold (DFT) determination.
All modern ICD's utilize a biphasic waveform for defibrillation. It has been clearly shown that biphasic waveforms reduce the energy required for internal defibrillation of the heart. However, there is no consensus on which pulse widths are best for defibrillation.
St. Jude Medical ICD's (implantable cardioverter defibrillators) have programmable pulse widths, which allow the physician multiple options in dealing with ICD patients. By implanting ICD's with programmable pulse widths, this study utilizes the Tissue RC Resistance/Capacitance) model to try to identify the optimal pulse widths.
To determine the efficacy of an optimal membrane time constant estimate for the "tuned" waveform, defibrillation testing must be performed. Upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) has been proposed as an alternative means of predicting the DFT and it has been shown that ULV guided DFT testing can achieve a defibrillation success rate of 95%.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients that are indicated for an ICD or CRT-D receive one of these devices.
Time frame: Implant
Time frame: Implant
Time frame: Implant
Abbott Medical Devices
Industry
Phase 4 Study That Compares the DFT (Defibrillation Threshold) Efficacy of 3 Different Membrane Time Constant Based Biphasic Defibrillation Waveforms
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04036695
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Arrythmia, Cardiac
London, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT02007499
Cardiac Arrest, Cardiopulmonary Arrest
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00127582
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Bradycardia
Rome, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT00748111
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Acute Myocardial Infarction
Paris, France
View Trial Details