Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03359148

Potential Risk for Bacterial Contamination in Ventilator Systems

Background: Few studies have investigated the difference of bacterial contamination between conventional reused ventilator systems and disposable closed ventilator-suction systems. The aim of this study was to investigate the bacterial contamination rates of the reused and disposable ventilation systems, and the association between system disconnection and bacterial contamination of ventilator systems.

Methods: The enrolled patients used a conventional reused ventilator system and a disposable closed ventilator-suction system, respectively, for a week; specimens were then collected from the ventilators' internal system to evaluate human and environmental bacterial contamination. The sputum specimens from patients were also analyzed in this study.

Results: The detection rate of bacteria in the conventional reused ventilator system was substantially higher than that in the disposable system. The inspiratory and expiratory limbs of disposable closed ventilator-suction system had higher bacterial concentrations than the conventional reused ventilator system. The bacterial concentration in the heated humidifier (HH) of the reused system was significantly higher than that in the disposable system. Positive associations existed among the bacterial concentrations at different locations in the reused and disposable ventilator systems, respectively. The predominant bacteria identified in the reused and disposable ventilator systems included Acinetobacter spp., Bacillus cereus, Elizabethkingia spp., Pseudomonas spp., and Stenotrophomonas (Xan) maltophilia.

Conclusion: Both the reused and disposable ventilation systems had high bacterial contamination rates after one week of use. Disconnection of the ventilator systems should be avoided during system operation for decreasing the risks of environmental pollution and human exposure, especially for the disposable system.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

The intubated and mechanically ventilated patients were enrolled from the Intensive Care Unit of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan. The experimental study group was assigned to a disposable ventilator system combined with an auto-filled heated humidifier (HH), a closed suction catheter, and a closed aerosol therapy procedure with a valved T-adaptor. According to clinical commonly used system, the control study group was assigned to use with conventional reused ventilator system, combined with a manually filled HH, an open suction catheter, and a conventional aerosol therapy procedure. Every patient was use above both ventilator systems.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • the mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU

Exclusion criteria

  • the sputum culture results of the patients indicated the presence of drug-resistant bacteria, influenza virus, and early extubation.

Treatment and study plan

Disposable ventilator system

Device

Conventional reused ventilator system

Device

Primary outcomes

  1. bacterial concentration

    Time frame: 7 days later

    comparison of the two ventilator systems

Secondary outcomes

  1. bacterial detection rate

    Time frame: 7 days later

    comparison of the two ventilator systems

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Chang Gung University

Other

Collaborators

  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

Potential Risk for Bacterial Contamination in Conventional Reused Ventilator Systems and Disposable Closed Ventilator-Suction Systems

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Dec 2, 2017
Registry last updated
Dec 2, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.