Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07421492

Postural Control in Amateur Footballers With Chronic Ankle Instability

This study will investigate static and dynamic postural control characteristics in male amateur football players with chronic ankle instability (CAI) compared with football players without ankle instability. Participants will undergo standardized biomechanical assessments using a force-platform-based postural analysis system to quantify postural sway under eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions and to evaluate direction-specific limits of stability performance.

In addition to conventional between-group comparisons, objective balance and stabilization variables will be used to develop supervised machine-learning classification models. These models will examine whether athletes demonstrating CAI-like functional patterns can be identified based solely on biomechanical performance data, independent of self-reported instability questionnaires.

The results are expected to enhance understanding of neuromuscular control deficits associated with chronic ankle instability and to support the development of objective, performance-based assessment approaches for football players.

The aim of this study is to determine the differences in static and dynamic postural control between amateur football players with and without chronic ankle instability and to evaluate whether multidimensional biomechanical balance parameters can be used to objectively characterize CAI-related functional profiles using machine-learning-based analysis.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–45 year

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Iğdır University

Iğdır, Turkey (Türkiye)

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male amateur football players with at least 2 years of competitive participation and ≥5 years of regular sports activity
  • Weekly football training volume of at least 3 hours
  • For the CAI group: history of ≥1 significant lateral ankle sprain occurring ≥12 months before testing that caused pain, swelling, and temporary interruption of sports participation
  • Presence of ≥2 episodes of giving-way or perceived ankle instability within the previous 6 months
  • CAIT score ≤24 for classification as chronic ankle instability
  • For the control group: no history of ankle sprain or perceived ankle instability and CAIT score ≥25
  • Participants free from ankle pain and acute inflammation at the time of assessment

Exclusion criteria

  • History of lower-extremity fracture or surgical intervention
  • Musculoskeletal injury of the knee, hip, or spine within the last 3 months
  • Diagnosed vestibular disorder or systemic balance impairment unrelated to the ankle
  • Active ankle pain or acute inflammatory symptoms at the time of testing
  • Any cardiovascular or systemic disease limiting safe participation in testing

Treatment and study plan

Dynamic stabilization with Tecnobody D-Wall

Other

Participants will undergo a non-invasive dynamic balance assessment using a force-platform-based postural analysis system. While standing on the platform, they will intentionally shift their center of pressure toward visual targets in multiple directions to evaluate voluntary postural control within stability limits. The test records total stability performance and directional control (%), test duration (s), and trunk deviation (°), reflecting proprioception and ankle stabilization capacity.

Static Balance Test with Tecnobody D-Wall

Other

Participants will perform a static postural stability test on a force-platform while standing quietly in an upright position under eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. The system will measure postural sway area (mm²) to quantify the ability to maintain balance with and without visual input. This assessment evaluates sensory integration and proprioceptive control associated with ankle stability.

Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool

Other

The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool is a validated self-reported questionnaire consisting of 9 items used to assess perceived ankle instability during daily and sport-related activities. It evaluates symptoms such as episodes of giving-way, pain, and functional control of the ankle, with total scores ranging from 0 to 30 (lower scores indicate greater instability). The CAIT is used as a screening questionnaire to classify participants according to the presence or absence of chronic ankle instability.

Primary outcomes

  1. Limits of Stability Total Score (%) During Force-Platform Dynamic Postural Control Assessment at Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline (single laboratory assessment session)

    Dynamic postural control will be evaluated using the limited stabilization (limits of stability) test performed on a force-platform-based postural analysis system. The total limits of stability score (%) reflects the participant's ability to voluntarily control the center of pressure within stability boundaries, with lower values indicating impaired neuromuscular ankle stabilization.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postural Sway Area (mm²) During Static Balance Assessment With Eyes Open and Eyes Closed at Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline (single laboratory assessment session)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Igdir University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Static and Dynamic Postural Control in Amateur Footballers With Chronic Ankle Instability: A Machine-Learning-Based Injury Risk Profiling Approach

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Feb 19, 2026
Registry last updated
Feb 19, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.