IYYU
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07716501
Musculoskeletal complaints are common among working adults and reflect demographic, occupational, ergonomic, and lifestyle-related influences. Whether postural awareness is associated with musculoskeletal complaints beyond these factors remains unclear. This study examined whether postural awareness was independently associated with the number of symptomatic body regions and regional musculoskeletal complaints among working adults.
In this cross-sectional study, 212 working adults completed the Postural Awareness Scale (PAS), Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire, International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and questionnaires assessing demographic characteristics, occupational factors, perceived workplace ergonomics, and regular exercise. The primary outcome was the number of symptomatic body regions. Hierarchical Poisson regression with robust standard errors was used to assess the association between postural awareness and the primary outcome after sequential covariate adjustment. Generalized Poisson regression was performed as a sensitivity analysis. Prespecified robust logistic regression models examined neck, upper-back, lower-back, and shoulder complaints, with Holm correction for multiple comparisons.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Observational
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
The present study investigated the association between postural awareness and musculoskeletal complaints in working adults across predominantly sitting, mixed, and predominantly standing working conditions. The primary hypothesis was that higher postural awareness would be associated with a lower number of symptomatic body regions after sequential adjustment for demographic characteristics, occupational factors, perceived workplace ergonomics, regular exercise, and physical activity. We additionally hypothesized that higher postural awareness would be associated with lower odds of complaints in the prespecified neck, upper-back, lower-back, and shoulder regions. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews. Demographic and occupational variables included age, sex, height, body weight, educational level, predominant working condition, duration in the current working arrangement, daily and weekly working hours, regular exercise participation, and perceived workplace ergonomics. Predominant working condition was self-reported and classified into three mutually exclusive categories: predominantly sitting, mixed sitting and standing, and predominantly standing. Participants were asked to indicate the posture in which they spent more than 50% of their working day. The mixed category represented participants who alternated between sitting and standing, with neither posture accounting for more than 50% of the working day.
Perceived workplace ergonomics was assessed by asking participants whether they considered their workplace to be ergonomically appropriate and categorized as ergonomic, partially ergonomic, or non-ergonomic. Because this variable reflected participants' subjective appraisal rather than an objective ergonomic assessment, it is referred to as perceived workplace ergonomics throughout the study. Regular exercise was defined as engaging in planned exercise at least three days per week, for at least 30 minutes per session, over the preceding three months. Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 29.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: At baseline
Musculoskeletal complaints during the preceding working week were assessed using the validated Turkish version of the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ). The CMDQ assesses the frequency, severity, and work interference associated with musculoskeletal discomfort across different anatomical regions. The Turkish version has demonstrated satisfactory construct validity and test-retest reliability in working adults. For each anatomical region, the weighted CMDQ score was calculated as the product of the frequency, discomfort-severity, and work-interference scores. Higher weighted scores indicate more frequent or severe discomfort and greater interference with work. A regional complaint was defined a priori as a weighted CMDQ score greater than zero. The primary outcome was the numbe
Time frame: At baseline
Postural awareness was assessed using the validated Turkish version of the Postural Awareness Scale (PAS). The original PAS was developed to assess two related dimensions: ease or familiarity with postural awareness and the need for attention regulation to achieve postural awareness. The resulting Turkish PAS comprises 11 items rated on a seven-point Likert scale and has demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency and test-retest reliability among Turkish office workers. After reverse-scoring the relevant items, item scores were summed to obtain a total score ranging from 11 to 77. Higher scores indicate greater self-reported postural awareness. The total PAS score was analysed as a continuous variable. For clinical and statistical interpretability, regression estimates were reported per 10-point increase in the PAS score.
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University
Other
Higher Postural Awareness is Associated With Fewer Musculoskeletal Complaints in Working Adults Beyond Occupational, Ergonomic, and Lifestyle Factors
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06964750
Behavior, Bone Diseases
Ankara, Kecioren, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07247305
Adolescence, Adolescent
Ismailia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04113642
Abdominal Muscle, Behavior
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06848114
Behavior, Hand-Eye Coordination
Istanbul, Eyüpsultan, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details