University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States
NCT Number: NCT06309693
In the effort to reduce postoperative opioid use, there has been increasing interest in developing multimodal pain regimens to better manage postoperative pain while minimizing opioid use and their subsequent side effects that can be detrimental to the healing process. Standard of care approaches to better manage postoperative pain include the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol and the use of peripheral and truncal nerve blocks. Truncal nerve blocks are widely used as an additional modality to provide longer lasting postoperative analgesia and have been adopted as part of the standard of care. The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of ERAS alone versus the quadratus lumborum (QL) nerve block on the postoperative pain experience for women with pelvic organ prolapse undergoing robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy. Subjects will be randomized to the ERAS protocol or the QL block. The main questions the study aims to answer are: 1) does the QL block decrease patient reported pain scores postoperatively; and 2) does the QL block decrease the amount of opioid pain medications in the immediate postoperative period? The primary outcome measure will be median patient reported pain score in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) following surgery.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States
The purpose of this study is to compare patient reported postoperative pain scores in women undergoing QL block versus ERAS protocol alone prior to minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Secondary aims will explore other outcomes that impact patients' overall postoperative pain experience.
Aim #1: To compare the median postoperative patient reported pain score in PACU between patients undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy, who are randomized to a preoperative QL block and the ERAS alone group.
Aim #2: To compare the maximum postoperative patient reported pain score in PACU between patients undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy, who are randomized to a preoperative QL block and the ERAS alone group.
Aim #3: To compare the total oral morphine equivalents (OME) in PACU between patients undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy, who are randomized to a preoperative QL block and the ERAS alone group.
Aim #4: To compare the rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV between patients in the QL block and ERAS alone groups undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
Aim #5: To compare the rates of overnight admission between patients in the QL block and ERAS alone groups undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
Aim #6: To compare the total time in the PACU between patients in the QL block and ERAS alone groups undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
Aim #7: To compare the rates of initial active voiding trial failures between patients in the QL block and ERAS alone groups undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The standard of care QL block will be performed by the regional anesthesia team according to their standard protocol with a uniform quantity and concentration of analgesic agent. Patients will subsequently be asked about their pain postoperatively and opioid medication administration will be quantified.
Subjects randomized to the ERAS arm will undergo the standard ERAS protocol of early postoperative ambulation, no bowel preparation, and the use of multimodal pain medications including acetaminophen and non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Patients will subsequently be asked about their pain postoperatively and opioid medication administration will be quantified.
Time frame: Immediate postoperative period while patient is in the PACU
Patients will be asked to rate their pain according to the numeric pain rating scale (0-10) by the nursing staff postoperatively at regular intervals in the PACU and the median score will be calculated.
Time frame: Immediate postoperative period while patient is in the PACU
Patients will be asked to rate their pain according to the numeric pain rating scale (0-10) by the nursing staff postoperatively at regular intervals in the PACU and the maximum score will be identified.
Time frame: Immediate postoperative period while patient is in the PACU
The total quantities of opioid pain medications will be identified on patient chart review and calculated into total OME.
Time frame: Immediate postoperative period while patient is in PACU
Rates of PONV will be determine by administration of anti-emetic medication in PACU or documentation of PONV in notes.
Time frame: Day of surgery
Chart review will be performed to identify patients admitted postoperatively excluding planned admissions.
Time frame: Immediate postoperative period while patient is in the PACU
The total time spent in PACU will be calculated based on chart review.
Time frame: Immediate postoperative period while patient is in the post-anesthesia recovery unit
The rates of initial voiding trial failures will be calculated based on chart review.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Other
Effect of Quadratus Lumborum (QL) Block in Postoperative Pain Management Following Robotic Assisted Sacrocolpopexy
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04198714
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03052816
Neurologic Manifestations, Pain
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03040011
Neurologic Manifestations, Pain
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03266926
Neurologic Manifestations, Pain
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details