CHU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
Nîmes, Gard, 30029, France
NCT Number: NCT01541059
The main objective of this study is to demonstrate the superiority of local analgesia with ropivacaine versus placebo on postoperative pain during the first 24 hours following bilateral surgery of all four third molars under general anesthesia.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me16 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Nîmes, Gard, 30029, France
The secondary objectives of this study are to compare regional anesthesia by ropivacaine versus placebo for the bilateral resection of all four third molars under general anesthesia, in terms of:
A. intraoperative use of propofol and remifentanil B. postoperative pain (EVN) at different time points C. in-hospital analgesic consumption D. time to first rescue analgesic request E. time spent in the post interventional treatment room F. length of hospital stay G. side effects H. analgesic consumption at home I. analgesic consumption (total) J. patient satisfaction K. Chronic pain after surgery
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Injection of saline solution into the vestibular capsule of each tooth to be extracted.
Other names: Standard intervention, Saline solution
Ropivacaine is injected into the vestibular capsule of each tooth to be extracted.
Other names: Experimental intervention.
Time frame: 24 hours
Pain is assessed via a numeric, verbal scale (0 to 10) at baseline and then at 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 24 hours after surgery. The area under the resulting curve is calculated.
Time frame: During surgery (approximately 30-50 minutes)
µg/kg
Time frame: During surgery (approximately 30-50 minutes)
mg/kg
Time frame: Day 1
score from 0 to 10
Time frame: Day 4
score from 0 to 10
Time frame: 1 month
score from 0 to 10
Time frame: 3 months
score from 0 to 10
Time frame: Hospital discharge (on average on days 1 or 2)
mg
Time frame: Hospital discharge (on average on days 1 or 2)
Time frame: Hospital discharge (on average on days 1 or 2)
mg
Time frame: Hospital discharge (on average on days 1 or 2)
g
Time frame: Hospital discharge (on average on days 1 or 2)
mg
Time frame: Hospital discharge (on average on days 1 or 2)
minutes
Time frame: Recovery room discharge (Day 1)
Time elapsed between admittance and discharge from the post-surgical recovery room. (minutes)
Time frame: Hospital discharge (on average on days 1 or 2)
Time elapsed between admittance to post-surgical recovery room and hospital discharge (hours)
Time frame: 6 hours
pruritus, nausea, vomiting, bleeding, anesthesia of the mouth, difficulty breathing, drowsiness, headache, sweating, palpitations, skin rash, difficult glutition, dysarthria
Time frame: day 1
pruritus, nausea, vomiting, bleeding, anesthesia of the mouth, difficulty breathing, drowsiness, headache, sweating, palpitations, skin rash, difficult glutition, dysarthria
Time frame: day 3
pruritus, nausea, vomiting, bleeding, anesthesia of the mouth, difficulty breathing, drowsiness, headache, sweating, palpitations, skin rash, difficult glutition, dysarthria
Time frame: Day 1
grams
Time frame: Day 3
grams
Time frame: Day 1
mg
Time frame: Day 3
mg
Time frame: Day 1
mg
Time frame: Day 3
mg
Time frame: Day 3
Patient satisfaction is evaluated via a numeric verbal scale ranging from 0 to 10.
Time frame: 1 month
standard DN4 score
Time frame: 3 months
standard DN4 score
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Other
Postoperative Analgesia in Third Molar Surgery Under General Anesthesia: Ropivacaine Versus Placebo
Acronym: RopiMol
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07436546
Impacted Third Molar, Impacted Third Molar Tooth
Rohtak, Haryana, India
View Trial DetailsNCT03944629
Arnica, Third Molar Extraction
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07185620
Piezoelectric Technique, Third Molar Extraction
Kahramanmaraş, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05971342
Third Molar Extraction
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial Details