Ankara University Faculty of Dentistry
Ankara, Çankaya, 06510, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06262841
The aim of this study is to compare piezosurgery and conventional surgery in impacted third molar surgery and to determine its effect on postoperative outcomes and quality of life.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–35 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ankara, Çankaya, 06510, Turkey (Türkiye)
The aim of our study is to comparatively evaluate the duration of the operation and the pain, trismus, edema and healing of the alveolar bone that occur after tooth extraction in surgical extractions of impacted lower third molar teeth using piezosurgery and traditional rotary instruments.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Piezosurgery used as an osteotomy device
Conventional burs used as an osteotomy device
Time frame: Time Frame: 14 days
Evaluated by Oral Health Impact Profile-14 questionnaire (OHIP-14). The OHIP-14 scores can range from 0 to 56 and are calculated by summing the ordinal values for the 14 items. The domain scores can range from 0 to 8. Higher OHIP-14 scores indicate worse and lower scores indicate better Oral Health Related Quality of Life.
Time frame: 7 days
Postoperative pain was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from the absence of pain (score 0) to the most severe pain imaginable
Time frame: 7 days
The distance between the mesio-incisal corners of the upper and lower central incisors was measured with the help of a ruler when the mouth opening was at its maximum.
Time frame: Intraoperative
The total time from the first incision of the operation site to the last suture was measured with the help of a digital stopwatch as the operation time.
Time frame: 7 days
With the technique described by Neupert ; Angle of mandible-tragus Angle of mandible-lateral canthus of eye Mandible corner-nose wing Angle of mandible oral-commissures Measurements were made with a tape measure from 5 points, with the mandible corner-pogonion.
Ankara University
Other
Comparative Evaluation of Morbidity and Alveolar Bone Healing After Surgical Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molar Teeth Using Piezosurgery and Conventional Instruments: A Split-Mouth Clinical Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07436546
Impacted Third Molar, Impacted Third Molar Tooth
Rohtak, Haryana, India
View Trial DetailsNCT06244797
Impacted Third Molar Tooth
Tokat Province, Kaleardı Neighbourhood, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07333963
Impacted Third Molar Tooth, Stomatognathic Diseases
Bytom, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT03893175
Acute Pain, Impacted Third Molar Tooth
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details