Arm A: Radiotherapy Omission
RadiationOmission of radiotherapy based on pre-surgical MRI and pathology findings at surgery.
Other names: A1: Grade 1 or 2/HER2 negative; A2: Grade 3 and/or HER2 positive
NCT Number: NCT06445738
The PROSPECTIVE trial aims to find out if using the results of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for early breast cancer can select people to not have radiotherapy and still have a low chance of the cancer coming back after surgery.
The main question it aims to answer is:
* Will cancer come back in the same breast as the original cancer in patients who have surgery for their breast cancer, but who don't have radiotherapy afterwards because the results of an MRI before surgery showed favourable characteristics for not having radiotherapy.
Interested in participating?
Request Info50 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
The Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
Breast cancer is the most common serious malignancy in women and most patients are suitable for therapy involving surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). For most patients, there is a lack of evidence that breast conserving surgery without adjuvant RT is safe and therefore patients bear the costs, inconvenience and morbidity of RT. Prior attempts to identify large subsets of patients for whom RT can be safely omitted based on clinicopathological features of the index cancer have had limited success, and so RT is currently omitted only in some women over 65 or 70 with small low risk cancers. Identification of a much larger subset of patients in whom adjuvant RT could be safely omitted would be hugely significant, not only to the patients, but to the entire health system.
The ANZ 1002 PROSPECT study was a two-arm phase II study that used breast MRI findings and pathological features to identify a group of patients with low risk early breast cancer in whom RT may be safely omitted. The findings at the primary strongly support the hypothesis and suggest that the combination of preoperative MRI and pathological features can identify a substantial group of early breast cancer patients in whom adjuvant RT can be safely omitted.
A Health Economic analysis of PROSPECT found that the avoided costs of RT and its potential side effects is likely to substantially outweigh the extra cost of MRI scans and associated investigations. Parallel cross-sectional studies assessing Fear of Cancer Recurrence (FCR) and Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in patients taking part in PROSPECT who either did or did not receive RT and a control group found a substantially lower FCR in PROSPECT patients who omitted RT as well as improved HRQoL.
The majority of screened and eligible patients (427/443 and 193/201, respectively) for PROSPECT were recruited from two Australian sites. Before the PROSPECT approach can be widely adopted, the findings need to be replicated in a multicentre, international study. In addition, patient reported outcomes and health economic assessments need to be performed prospectively and longitudinally.
PROSPECTIVE is the follow-up to PROSPECT which will address these issues, and also include translational research aspects to further study the natural history and outcomes of this group of lower risk early breast cancers.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
For inclusion in the study at Registration, participants must fulfil all of the following criteria:
HER2 neu status will be assessed by immunohistochemistry and will be scored as follows46:
Exclusion criteria
Any one of the following at Registration is regarded as a criterion for exclusion from the study:
Allocation: Arm A - Radiotherapy Omission
In addition to the above criteria, for inclusion in the omission of radiation therapy arm of the study after surgery, participants must fulfil all the following criteria. Participants not fulfilling any one of the following criterial will be allocated to Arm B:
The overall tumour size (including additional foci of DCIS) must remain ≤ 20 mm. The tumour size is defined as the longest distance between the outer most edges of all foci, the space between the two or more foci is included in the overall size: Size = ('Focus A + Focus B + 'the distance between A and B').
Allocation: Arm B - Standard Treatment (ineligible for RT omission on study; includes management of MRI-detected lesions)
In addition to the above Inclusion Criteria, participants who fulfil one any of the following criteria will receive standard treatment:
Omission of radiotherapy based on pre-surgical MRI and pathology findings at surgery.
Other names: A1: Grade 1 or 2/HER2 negative; A2: Grade 3 and/or HER2 positive
Ineligible for RT omission on study; includes management of MRI-detected lesions.
Time frame: Median of 5 years follow up (when 300th low risk patient in Arm A reaches 5 years follow up)
To determine the ipsilateral invasive recurrence rate (IIRR) in lower risk patients with unequivocally unifocal breast cancer and on breast MRI and favourable clinico-pathological features.
Time frame: Median of 10 years follow up after surgery.
To determine the ipsilateral invasive recurrence rate (IIRR) in patients allocated to omit radiotherapy (Arm A1).
Time frame: Median of 5 years and 10 years follow up after surgery.
To determine the ipsilateral invasive recurrence rate (IIRR) in participants in Arm A2, Arm A, Arm B, and Arms A+B.
Time frame: Median of 5 and 10 years follow up after surgery.
To determine the ipsilateral DCIS rate in the breast in participants in Arm A1, Arm A2, Arm A, Arm B, and Arms A+B.
Time frame: Median of 5 and 10 years follow up after surgery.
To determine the combined ipsilateral DCIS and invasive recurrence rate (IRR) in the breast in participants in Arm A1, Arm A2, Arm A, Arm B, and Arms A+B.
Time frame: Median of 5 and 10 years follow up after surgery.
To determine the regional recurrence rate in participants in Arm A1, Arm A2, Arm A, Arm B, and Arms A+B.
Time frame: Median of 5 and 10 years follow up after surgery.
To determine the distant recurrence rate in participants in Arm A1, Arm A2, Arm A, Arm B, and Arms A+B.
Time frame: Median of 5 and 10 years follow up after surgery.
To determine the contralateral DCIS and invasive breast cancer rate in participants in Arm A1, Arm A2, Arm A, Arm B, and Arms A+B.
Time frame: Median of 5 and 10 years follow up after surgery.
BCCS rate defined as the percentage of people who have not died from breast cancer.
Time frame: Median of 5 and 10 years follow up after surgery.
OS rate defined as the percentage of people alive.
Time frame: Median 24 months post-surgery
To determine the difference in Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) between Arm A and Arm B measured by the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory Short Form (FCRI-SF). A higher score indicates a greater fear of recurrence.
Time frame: At median of 24 months post-surgery
To determine the difference in levels of FCR and perception of risk of recurrence in Arm A measured by the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory - Short Form and 2 items adapted from Abbott et al. A higher score indicates greater fear of recurrence and greater risk perception.
Time frame: From allocation to 3-, 6-, 12-, 24- and 60 months median follow-up post-surgery.
To determine the difference over time in FCR and perception of risk of recurrence between Arm A and Arm B over time as measured by the FCRI-SF and 2 items adapted from Abbott et al. A higher score indicates greater fear of recurrence and greater risk perception.
Time frame: From allocation to 3-, 6-, 12-, 24- and 60 months median follow up post-surgery
To determine the difference in perceptions of risk of recurrence in the breast and elsewhere in the body measured by 2 items adapted from Abbott et al. A higher score indicates greater risk perception.
Time frame: At a median of 24 months post-surgery.
To determine the difference in breast-specific symptoms, cosmetic status, arm- and shoulder functional status measured by the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcomes Scale (BCTOS); and fatigue, body image, financial toxicity measured by the EORTC IL353. A higher score indicates greater morbidity, greater fatigue; greater financial toxicity; poorer body image.
Time frame: From allocation to 3-, 6-, 12-, 24- and 60 months median follow up post-surgery
To determine the HRQoL (functional and aesthetic outcomes, fatigue, body image, financial toxicity), in Arm A measured by the BCTOS (breast-specific symptoms, cosmetic status, arm- and shoulder functional status) EORTC IL353 measure (custom measure for this protocol) (fatigue, body image, financial toxicity). A higher score indicates greater fatigue, poorer body image and greater financial toxicity.
Time frame: From allocation to 3-, 6-, 12-, 24- and 60 months median follow-up post-surgery.
To determine the difference in breast-specific symptoms, cosmetic status, arm- and shoulder functional status measured by the BCTOS; and fatigue, body image, financial toxicity measured by the EORTC IL353between Arm A and Arm B.
Time frame: At a median of 24 months follow up post-surgery.
To determine the Quality of Life Years (QALYs) between Arms A and Arm B measured by the EQ-5D-5L. A high score indicates more problems.
Time frame: From registration to allocation, 3-, 6-, 12-, 24- and 60 months median follow-up post-surgery..
To determine the Quality of Life Years (QALYs) between Arms A and Arm B over time measured by the EQ-5D-5L. A high score indicates more problems.
Time frame: At median of 24 months follow up post-surgery.
To determine the difference in decision regret between Arm A and Arm B measured by Decision Regret Scale. A higher score indicates more regret.
Time frame: At median 24 months of follow-up post-surgery.
To determine decision regret in Arm A measured by Decision Regret Scale. A higher score indicates more regret.
Time frame: From allocation to 3-, 6-, 12-, 24- and 60 months median follow-up post-surgery.
To determine the overall mental health and differences over time in depression between Arm A and Arm B. Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2. A higher score indicates and greater symptom burden.
Time frame: At 24 months median follow-up post-surgery.
To determine the overall mental health and differences over time in anxiety in Arm A, measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2. A higher score indicates a higher symptom burden.
Time frame: From allocation to 3-, 6-, 12-, 24- and 60 months median follow-up post-surgery.
To determine the overall mental health and differences over time in depression between Arm A and Arm B. Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2. A higher score indicates and greater symptom burden.
Time frame: From allocation to 3-, 6-, 12-, 24- and 60 months median follow-up post-surgery.
To determine the overall mental health and differences over time in anxiety between Arm A and Arm B. Measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2. A higher score indicates and greater symptom burden.
Time frame: Median of 5 and 10 years follow up
To analyse oncological outcomes in relation to the intensity of endocrine therapy (ET) (no ET, less than 2 years ET, 2-5 years ET, more than 5 years ET).
Time frame: Measured at a median of 6-, 24- and 60- months follow-up post-surgery.
ET side effects as measured with the FACT-ES.
Time frame: At the time of the pre-operative MRI
Outcomes of MRI in those patients who have MRI post-registration measured by BPR, occult lesion rate, biopsy approach, result of biopsy, malignant occult lesion rate.
Time frame: At the time of the pre-operative MRI
To number of occult lesions and malignant occult lesions detected on pre-operative MRI per institution
Time frame: At the time of the pre-operative MRI
Measured by the frequency of occult lesions on CEM in patients undergoing CEM in addition to MRI and comparison of CEM and MRI findings.
Time frame: 60-months post-surgery
Health economic impact of including preoperative MRI and post-operative modification of adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer management in patients who have not had an MRI or CEM before PROSPECTIVE registration, as measured by QALYs (from the EQ-5D-5L).
Time frame: At the time of diagnosis
By sequencing and analysis of index tumours.
Time frame: At the time of surgery for recurrence
By sequencing and analysis of recurrent tumours.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Breast Cancer Trials, Australia and New Zealand
Other
A Two-arm, Non-randomised, Prospective, Multicentre Study Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings and Pathology Features to Select Patients With Early Breast Cancer for Omission of Post-operative Radiotherapy
Acronym: PROSPECTIVE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05535192
Breast Cancer, Breast Cancer Female
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07198724
Breast Cancer, Breast Cancer Female
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07505797
Benign Breast Condition, Breast Cancer
Sacramento, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05072314
Breast Cancer, Breast Cancer Female
Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial Details