Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06938607

Post-operative Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery With and Without Drain Placement

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) is a widely performed surgical procedure used to treat cervical spondylosis and cervical disc herniations with cervical nerve root compression and or cervical spinal cord compression when conservative treatment options have been exhausted. The primary aim of ACDF is to alleviate neck, shoulder, and upper extremity pain associated with degenerative cervical disc disease by removing one or more affected discs, decompressing the nerves, and restoring cervical spine anatomy through the implantation of structural allograft/autograft bone or artificial spacers, plates, and screws. Historically, ACDF has demonstrated substantial long-term benefits in pain relief and quality of life improvements for patients. In the United States alone, the annual number of ACDF procedures exceeds 150,000 and is projected to rise significantly over the next four decades. Despite its technical complexity, ACDF is considered a relatively safe procedure. Common postoperative complications include dysphagia (1.7-9.5%), hematoma (0.4-5.6%), worsening myelopathy (0.2-3.3%), recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (0.9-3.1%), cerebrospinal fluid leakage (0.5-1.7%), and surgical site infections (0.9-1.6%). One strategy employed to mitigate postoperative complications such as hematoma, surgical site infection, and the need for reoperation is the placement of an indwelling subfascial drain within the surgical site. These drains facilitate the removal of accumulated blood or serous fluid, thereby reducing localized pressure and potentially preventing adverse outcomes. Despite its theoretical benefits, the utility of subfascial drains remains a topic of debate among surgeons. Given the limited evidence on the efficacy of subfascial drain placement following ACDF, this study proposes a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the necessity and impact of subfascial drain placement on postoperative outcomes.

This study will determine whether subfascial drain placement reduces the incidence of postoperative complications, including hematoma, infection, airway compromise and secondary surgeries, compared to no drain placement following ACDF surgery; assess the impact of subfascial drain placement on the severity and duration of postoperative dysphagia compared to no drain placement; and evaluate participant-reported outcomes and satisfaction, including postoperative pain and recovery experience, between the drain and no-drain groups.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Conditions

Age range

19 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

University of Nebraska Medical Center

Omaha, Nebraska, 68198, United States

Location contact

Chris Cornett, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

402-559-5626

About this study

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) is a widely performed surgical procedure used to treat cervical spondylosis and cervical disc herniations with cervical nerve root compression and or cervical spinal cord compression when conservative treatment options have been exhausted. The primary aim of ACDF is to alleviate neck, shoulder, and upper extremity pain associated with degenerative cervical disc disease by removing one or more affected discs, decompressing the nerves, and restoring cervical spine anatomy through the implantation of structural allograft/autograft bone or artificial spacers, plates, and screws. Historically, ACDF has demonstrated substantial long-term benefits in pain relief and quality of life improvements for patients. In the United States alone, the annual number of ACDF procedures exceeds 150,000 and is projected to rise significantly over the next four decades. Despite its technical complexity, ACDF is considered a relatively safe procedure. Common postoperative complications include dysphagia (1.7-9.5%), hematoma (0.4-5.6%), worsening myelopathy (0.2-3.3%), recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (0.9-3.1%), cerebrospinal fluid leakage (0.5-1.7%), and surgical site infections (0.9-1.6%). One strategy employed to mitigate postoperative complications such as hematoma, surgical site infection, and the need for reoperation is the placement of an indwelling subfascial drain within the surgical site. These drains facilitate the removal of accumulated blood or serous fluid, thereby reducing localized pressure and potentially preventing adverse outcomes. Despite its theoretical benefits, the utility of subfascial drains remains a topic of debate among surgeons. Given the limited evidence on the efficacy of subfascial drain placement following ACDF, this study proposes a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the necessity and impact of subfascial drain placement on postoperative outcomes.

This study will determine whether subfascial drain placement reduces the incidence of postoperative complications, including hematoma, infection, airway compromise and secondary surgeries, compared to no drain placement following ACDF surgery; assess the impact of subfascial drain placement on the severity and duration of postoperative dysphagia compared to no drain placement; and evaluate participant-reported outcomes and satisfaction, including postoperative pain and recovery experience, between the drain and no-drain groups. Up to 360 participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Those signed to the drain group will have a surgical drain placed on the surface of the wound during closure. The drain will be removed within 24 hours. Those in the no-drain group will have their wound closed without a drain. All other aspects of participants' care before and after surgery will be the same. No additional visits are required for this study. Basic information will be collected from participants' medical records, such as age, gender, type of surgery. For 180 days following surgery, participants' health will be monitored through clinical visit notes, phone calls with their doctor or clinic staff, and records of any hospital visits due to complications.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 19-75 years of age
  • Having elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery

Exclusion criteria

  • Unable to stop anticoagulation medication
  • Cervical (neck) cancer or tumor
  • Combined anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, and posterior cervical fusion
  • Active infection or trauma

Treatment and study plan

Drain

Device

Participants assigned to the drain group will have a surgical drain placed on the surface of the wound during closure. The drain will be removed within 24 hours.

Primary outcomes

  1. Surgical Complications

    Time frame: Post-surgery 1-2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months

    Complications such as hematoma, infection, airway-compromise, and other complications will be recorded and monitored immediately after surgery and at followed-up visits, 1-2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Dysphagia Assessment EAT-10

    Time frame: Post-surgery 1-2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months

    Dysphagia, the difficulty swallowing foods or liquids, will be assessed assessed at 1-2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months,using EAT-10 assessment tool. This tool has ten questions that are rated from 0 (no problem) to 4 (severe problem). Scores of 3 or above are considered abnormal.

  2. Length of Hospital Stay

    Time frame: Post-surgery typically up to 1 week

    The total length of the post-surgical hospital stay will be obtained from medical records.

  3. Post-operative Pain Assessment

    Time frame: Post-surgery 1-2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months

    Post-operative pain will be assessed using the self-reported numerical scale (0 - no pain, 10 - worst pain imaginable) at 1-2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Chris Cornett, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

402-559-5626

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Nebraska

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Post-operative Outcomes Comparing Drain vs No Drain Placement Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2029
First posted
Apr 22, 2025
Registry last updated
May 12, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.