Adalimumab
BiologicalAdalimumab
Other names: Humira
NCT Number: NCT02739828
The objective of this study is to assess quality of life (QoL), skin pain, work productivity/activity and health related problems in Swedish patients with moderate to severe HS before and after 6 months treatment with Adalimumab. Participants will be treated in accordance with normal routine clinical care.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–99 year
All sexes
Observational
Universitetssjukhuset Linköping, Linkoping, Västra Götaland County, Sweden
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Adalimumab
Other names: Humira
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
DLQI assesses symptoms and impacts of dermatologic diseases on quality of life. DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a more impaired quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
DLQI assesses symptoms and impacts of dermatologic diseases on quality of life. DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a more impaired quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DLQI assesses symptoms and impacts of dermatologic diseases on quality of life. DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a more impaired quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
The Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain NRS was used to assess the worst and average skin pain due to HS. NRS consists of 2 VAS response questions. Skin pain was rated from 0 (no skin pain) to 10 (skin pain as bad as you can imagine) for each.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
The Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain NRS was used to assess the worst and average skin pain due to HS. NRS consists of 2 VAS response questions. Skin pain was rated from 0 (no skin pain) to 10 (skin pain as bad as you can imagine) for each.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
The Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain NRS was used to assess the worst and average skin pain due to HS. NRS consists of 2 VAS response questions. Skin pain was rated from 0 (no skin pain) to 10 (skin pain as bad as you can imagine) for each.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
The EQ-5D is a participant assessment of 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Participants report the extent of their problems with each of the 5 dimensions of health as "some problems/no problems," "some problems/no problems/unable to do," or "none/moderate/extreme."
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
The EQ-5D is a participant assessment of 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Participants report the extent of their problems with each of the 5 dimensions of health as "some problems/no problems," "some problems/no problems/unable to do," or "none/moderate/extreme."
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
The EQ-5D is a participant assessment of 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Participants report the extent of their problems with each of the 5 dimensions of health as "some problems/no problems," "some problems/no problems/unable to do," or "none/moderate/extreme."
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0-100 where increased scores correspond to better HRQL. 0 is the 'worst imaginable health state' and 100 is the 'best imaginable health state'. Change in EQ-5D VAS score was calculated by deducting the final score from the baseline score. Increased scores correspond to better health state.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0-100 where increased scores correspond to better HRQL. 0 is the 'worst imaginable health state' and 100 is the 'best imaginable health state'. Change in EQ-5D VAS score was calculated by deducting the final score from the baseline score. Increased scores correspond to better health state.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0-100 where increased scores correspond to better HRQL. 0 is the 'worst imaginable health state' and 100 is the 'best imaginable health state'. Change in EQ-5D VAS score was calculated by deducting the final score from the baseline score. Increased scores correspond to better health state.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
The HSIA is a disease specific questionnaire measuring the impact the participant experiences associated with HS. HSIA consist of 18 sub-items, 16 of which range from 0 (no impact) to 10 (most negative impact), and 2 items register time at work/school and time away from work/school because of HS. Overall scores are presented as the percent of maximum HS impact (high values indicate a negative HS impact).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
The HSIA is a disease specific questionnaire measuring the impact the participant experiences associated with HS. HSIA consist of 18 sub-items, 16 of which range from 0 (no impact) to 10 (most negative impact), and 2 items register time at work/school and time away from work/school because of HS. Overall scores are presented as the percent of maximum HS impact (high values indicate a negative HS impact).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
The HSIA is a disease specific questionnaire measuring the impact the participant experiences associated with HS. HSIA consist of 18 sub-items, 16 of which range from 0 (no impact) to 10 (most negative impact), and 2 items register time at work/school and time away from work/school because of HS. Overall scores are presented as the percent of maximum HS impact (high values indicate a negative HS impact).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
The 'work time missed due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'work time missed due to health problem' was calculated based on 2 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit and (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4) and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
The 'work time missed due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'work time missed due to health problem' was calculated based on 2 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit and (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4) and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
The 'work time missed due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'work time missed due to health problem' was calculated based on 2 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit and (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4) and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q5/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q5/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q5/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
The 'overall activity impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall activity impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q6) to what degree did the disease impair the ability to do regular activities in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q6/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Week 4, 12 and 24
HiSCR is a clinical endpoint focusing on assessment of HS inflammatory signs and symptoms to determine the clinical effectiveness of adalimumab.
HiSCR requires:
AbbVie
Industry
Post Marketing Observational Study to Assess Quality of Life Changes in Swedish Patients With Moderate or Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) After 6 Months on Adalimumab Treatment (HOPE Study)
Acronym: HOPE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06801795
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07708480
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT06411379
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06411899
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details