University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon City Hospital
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7K 0M7, Canada
NCT Number: NCT01563783
This Post Market study is being conducted to compare the direct and indirect cost of three approaches (GFA, myomectomy, and uterine artery embolization) for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7K 0M7, Canada
Uterine fibroids are the most common pelvic neoplasms in women; they severely impact quality of life and are the leading indication for hysterectomy. Hysterectomy is the definitive treatment for myomas; however, many patients seek alternative uterine-sparing therapy and desire to conserve their fertility. Myomectomy is a much-reported surgical option for women with symptomatic fibroids and, until recently, the abdominal approach has been the approach of choice for most surgeons. Over time, patients have requested less invasive procedures and minimally invasive, laparoscopic options are becoming more popular among patients and their gynecologists. Standard surgical and interventional treatments for uterine fibroids are costly to society and to the health care system. New technologies such as GFA may offer a low-cost alternative to the standard treatments for symptomatic uterine fibroids in women who desire uterine conservation. This study seeks to evaluate those cost differences between three available uterine-sparing techniques and to explore the qualitative outcomes such as symptom severity, health related quality of life, and overall treatment effect.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
GFA is being used for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids
Other names: GFA
Myomectomy is a procedure in which uterine fibroids are surgically removed from the uterus.
Other names: Myomectomy
UAE is a minimally invasive surgical procedure used to treat uterine fibroids.
Other names: UAE
Time frame: 3 months post procedure
To compare medical, surgical, and hospitalization costs (including procedural complication costs) of Global Fibroid Ablation (GFA) compared to those of Myomectomy and Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE)at 3 months post procedure.
Time frame: 3 months post procedure
Overall rates of acute (within 48 hours post procedure) and near-term (between 2 and 30 days post procedure) serious complications in all GFA subjects compared to the acute and near-term treatment-related serious adverse event rates in the pivotal study.
Time frame: 60 Months
Safety measures will be assessed by comparing the complication rate for all three alternatives (GFA, Myomectomy, UAE).
Time frame: 60 Months
Compare incidence costs of post discharge procedure-related complications and re-interventions we well as indirect cost factors defined as days to return-to-work, return to normal activities of daily living, and cost of care up to 60 months post discharge.
Time frame: 60 Months
To compare fibroid symptom severity and quality of life scores at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post procedure as compared to baseline using the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health Related Quality of Life (UFS-QoL0 assessment tool.
Time frame: 60 Months
Compare subjects menstrual bleeding pre-treatment and up to 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post treatment using the Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ).
Time frame: 60 Months
Compare subject's satisfaction and general health outcome at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post procedure as compared to baseline using the EQ-5D (a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome).
Acessa Health, Inc.
Industry
The Trust (Treatment Results of Uterine Sparing Technologies) Study
Acronym: TRUST
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01750008
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Tübingen, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT03271489
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03751124
Connective Tissue Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01865929
Cervical Dysplasia, Female Urogenital Diseases
Lund, Sweden
View Trial Details