iTIND
DeviceThe iTind is implemented for 5-7 days
NCT Number: NCT04757116
The study objective is to evaluate the safety of the iTind device comparied to UroLift.
Interested in participating?
Request Info50 year and older
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, Isleworth, Middlesex, United Kingdom
Both iTind and UroLift are minimally invasive treatment options for relieving lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The iTind device is a temporary, self-expanding nitinol implant that remains in place for 5 to 7 days to reshape the prostatic urethra through localized ischemic pressure and tissue remodeling. In contrast, the UroLift system involves the permanent placement of transprostatic implants that retract the enlarged lateral lobes of the prostate to widen the urethral lumen.
This study is designed to directly compare the safety and effectiveness of the iTind device versus the UroLift system in treating LUTS due to BPH.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The iTind is implemented for 5-7 days
UroLift is a minimally invasive procedure where permanent implants are placed in the prostate.
Time frame: 3 months
Incidence of all intraoperative and post-operative complications (i.e., related to procedure and/or device) at 3 months
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months
Difference in change of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) from baseline between iTind and UroLift groups
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months
Difference in change of QoL scores from baseline between iTind and UroLift
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months
Difference in rate of re-intervention between iTind and UroLift groups
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months
Difference in reporting between iTind and UroLift groups in overall incidence of adverse events.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Lina Ginnetti, MA
CONTACT
Selen ZuelbaharOlgun, PhD
CONTACT
Olympus Corporation of the Americas
Industry
A Post-Market, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter International Study to Assess the Safety of the Temporarily Implanted Nitinol Device (iTind) Compared to the UroLift® System in Subjects With Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
Acronym: MT-08
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07627178
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH), Bladder Outlet Obstruction
Tanta, Gharbia Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07016620
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH), Genital Diseases
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06817733
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH), Genital Diseases
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06769997
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH), Genital Diseases
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial Details