Bioinductive implant
DeviceOther names: Rotation Medical Rotator Cuff System™, REGENETEN™ Bioinductive Implant System.
NCT Number: NCT02200939
The purpose of this study is to evaluate bioinduction of new tissue and tendon healing after implantation of the Rotation Medical Bioinductive Implant used as either a standalone device or adjunct to surgical repair in the treatment of supraspinatus tendon tears.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Southern California Orthopedic Institute, Van Nuys, California, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Subjects enrolled in the study MUST meet all of the following criteria:
A. Medium or large partial-thickness tear or very small full-thickness tear of the supraspinatus tendon planned for standalone treatment (no surgical repair with sutures/suture anchors) with the bioinductive implant B. Medium or large full-thickness tear primarily of the supraspinatus tendon planned for treatment with the bioinductive implant adjunctive to surgical repair
Exclusion criteria
Subjects enrolled in the study MUST NOT meet any of the following criteria:
Other names: Rotation Medical Rotator Cuff System™, REGENETEN™ Bioinductive Implant System.
Surgical repair with commercially-available sutures/suture anchors.
Time frame: Pre-operatively (baseline) to 3 month, 1 year, and 2 year
The total thickness of the tendon and any newly induced tissue at the implant site were measured at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Measurements were compared to pre-operative (baseline) supraspinatus tendon thickness to calculate the mean (± SD) change in post-operative supraspinatus tendon thickness by partial-thickness tear size (Intermediate or High) or full thickness tear size (Medium or Large).
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years
Partial-thickness tears were classified as Intermediate (3-6 mm) or High (> 6 mm) grade tears. Full thickness tears were categorized using Cofield classification as Medium (1-3 cm) or Large (3-5 cm). Integration and maturation of the newly induced tissue was assessed by MRI at each post-operative follow-up and determined by answering Yes, No, or Unable to determine to the following questions:
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years
For tendon defects treated by standalone use of the device (i.e., implantation without surgical repair using sutures/suture anchors), post-operative follow-up MRIs will be used to estimate the amount of defect fill-in with newly induced tissue and the quality of the filled-in tissue. In the absence of fill-in with newly induced tissue, defect progression (i.e., change in size relative to previous MRIs) will be assessed. The amount of fill-in relative to the pre-operative, baseline MRI classified as:
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years
Re-tear rate following rotator cuff repair assessed by MRI. Any new observable defect (i.e. loss in supraspinatus tendon continuity) will be classified as a re-tear.
Time frame: Intraoperative
Mean (± SD) device implant time in minutes was assessed starting at time from introduction of the guide wire instrument into the subacromial space through completion of the last staple.
Time frame: Intraoperative
Procedure technical success was measured by the count of participants where the device was successfully delivered and affixed to the target tendon location (i.e., implant of device was attempted and successful).
Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 1 year, and 2 years
The ASES consisted of subcomponent scores including pain, shoulder function, and shoulder scores as follows:
Scores were collected at baseline and each successive follow-up visits (3 months, 1 year, and 2 years).
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years
The overall CMS shoulder score ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 being severe restrictions and 100 being no restrictions (i.e., higher score is better). Scores were collected a baseline and each subsequent follow-up (3 months, 1 year, and 2 years).
Time frame: Post-operatively to study completion, approximately 2 years
Cumulative number of days index shoulder was in a sling.
Time frame: Post-operatively to study completion, approximately 2 years
Cumulative number of completed rehabilitation or physical therapy (PT) visits in days to treat index shoulder.
Time frame: Post-operatively to study completion, approximately 2 years
Cumulative number of days between discharge and return to work (employed subjects only).
Time frame: Post-operatively to study completion, approximately 2 years
Return to normal daily activities (i.e. full, unrestricted activity) determined by the cumulative number of days between discharge and return to normal daily activity.
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years
Self-reported measure of the level of satisfaction with the surgical outcome of the index surgery on 5-point Likert scale where participants were asked to indicated the best response to being satisfied with the outcome of the study procedure from one of the following:
"Strongly Disagree" indicated the lowest level of satisfaction and "Strongly Agree" indicated the greatest level of satisfaction.
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Industry
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.