Zealand University Hospital
Køge, 4600, Denmark
NCT Number: NCT02784574
This study aims to investigate current aftercare activities in Denmark after intensive care unit (ICU) treatment. The hypothesis is that a large number of hospitals offer aftercare, and these interventions are heterogenic and differ between hospitals and regions.
This study is an electronic questionnaire survey that aim to describe and map Danish aftercare activities, and future development plans in this field.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Observational
Køge, 4600, Denmark
Annually, more than 30,000 patients are admitted for treatment at Danish intensive care units (ICUs). These critically ill patients are some of the most vulnerable in the health care system.
For years, focus has primarily been on treatment and survival of this patient group. As treatment effectiveness has gradually increased, the overall survival rate is now above 80%. Consequently, the period following ICU discharge has gained increasing focus and follow up interventions in the period after ICU treatment have become more common. These different follow up interventions has given name to the concept of 'aftercare'. Aftercare activities includes both early rehabilitation initiated during the continued hospital admission and also the following rehabilitation after hospital discharge.
Complications after intensive care treatment are numerous, including both physical, cognitive and psychological impairments, e.g. depression, muscle weakness, anxiety and social isolation. Together these symptoms are defined as post intensive care syndrome (PICS).
While it is clear that a need for aftercare exists, the optimal evidence based activities remains to be determined. The current follow-up activities are established as local initiatives and the methods vary greatly. Examples of present aftercare interventions include use of diaries, follow-up consultations, revisiting the ICU and assessment of quality of life.
A recent systematic review examined these different rehabilitation efforts, without finding significant effects of the present interventions, although usage of ICU-diaries had a minor preventive effect on post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSD). A Danish meta-analysis from 2015 on follow-up consultations showed similar results.
Aftercare is a rapidly developing area and it is necessary to further investigate this important topic. Therefore, the investigators want to describe the current level of aftercare with a new mapping of activities in all Danish ICUs. Hereby, the investigators hope to create a better and up-to-date foundation for further development within Danish aftercare. Furthermore, the investigators wish to research on the clinician-experienced (the participants) attitude towards and limitations for aftercare activities, in order to discuss directions for future development.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Intensive care units with a specialty field within these four groups:
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose 'yes' or 'no'
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose 'yes' or 'no'
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose 'yes' or 'no'
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose 'yes' or 'no'
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list of options: All patients, Depending of length of stay, days with mechanical ventilation, or other: the respondent will specify
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list of options: All patients, Depending of length of stay, days with mechanical ventilation, or other: the respondent will specify
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list of options: How many hours to days until the patient is contacted at the general wards
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list of options: How many months from discharge, until the patient is contacted
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list of options: The personnel participating in the aftercare: Doctor, nurse, occupational therapist, physical therapist, pharmacist, psychologist or other
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list of options: How much time is spent (in minutes) pr. contact with the patient
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list of options: The personnel participating in the aftercare: Doctor, nurse, occupational therapist, physical therapist, pharmacist, psychologist or other
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list of options: How much time is spent (in minutes) pr. contact with the patient
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will be choosing interventions from a list, and also be able to specify other interventions not present on the list
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will be choosing interventions from a list, and also be able to specify other interventions not present on the list
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will be choosing screening tools and methods from a list, and also be able to specify other screening tools and methods not present on the list
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will be choosing screening tools and methods from a list, and also be able to specify other screening tools and methods not present on the list
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list of options: How the ICU contacts the patient after hospital discharge. By phone, by letter, by mail, by digital inbox
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list: Whether the family is invited to participate in the consultation with the patient or not. Yes/No
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list of options: Not enough money, resistance from the general wards, not an important subject, and also be able to write their own answer.
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose from a list of options: The ICU itself, the general ward, the region or through funds?
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose on a scale: More aftercare? Same level of aftercare? Less aftercare?
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent will choose on a scale: Totally agree, partially agree, neither agree or disagree, partially disagree, totally disagree
Zealand University Hospital
Other
Follow-up After Intensive Care Treatment: a Questionnaire Survey of Intensive Care Aftercare in Denmark.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04977297
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03885687
Behavior, Critical Illness
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01486121
Agnosia, Anxiety Disorders
Clermont-Ferrand, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06977555
Behavior, Communication
Oslo, Norway
View Trial Details