Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02784574

Post ICU Follow up: A Questionnaire Survey of Aftercare in Denmark

This study aims to investigate current aftercare activities in Denmark after intensive care unit (ICU) treatment. The hypothesis is that a large number of hospitals offer aftercare, and these interventions are heterogenic and differ between hospitals and regions.

This study is an electronic questionnaire survey that aim to describe and map Danish aftercare activities, and future development plans in this field.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Zealand University Hospital

Køge, 4600, Denmark

About this study

Annually, more than 30,000 patients are admitted for treatment at Danish intensive care units (ICUs). These critically ill patients are some of the most vulnerable in the health care system.

For years, focus has primarily been on treatment and survival of this patient group. As treatment effectiveness has gradually increased, the overall survival rate is now above 80%. Consequently, the period following ICU discharge has gained increasing focus and follow up interventions in the period after ICU treatment have become more common. These different follow up interventions has given name to the concept of 'aftercare'. Aftercare activities includes both early rehabilitation initiated during the continued hospital admission and also the following rehabilitation after hospital discharge.

Complications after intensive care treatment are numerous, including both physical, cognitive and psychological impairments, e.g. depression, muscle weakness, anxiety and social isolation. Together these symptoms are defined as post intensive care syndrome (PICS).

While it is clear that a need for aftercare exists, the optimal evidence based activities remains to be determined. The current follow-up activities are established as local initiatives and the methods vary greatly. Examples of present aftercare interventions include use of diaries, follow-up consultations, revisiting the ICU and assessment of quality of life.

A recent systematic review examined these different rehabilitation efforts, without finding significant effects of the present interventions, although usage of ICU-diaries had a minor preventive effect on post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSD). A Danish meta-analysis from 2015 on follow-up consultations showed similar results.

Aftercare is a rapidly developing area and it is necessary to further investigate this important topic. Therefore, the investigators want to describe the current level of aftercare with a new mapping of activities in all Danish ICUs. Hereby, the investigators hope to create a better and up-to-date foundation for further development within Danish aftercare. Furthermore, the investigators wish to research on the clinician-experienced (the participants) attitude towards and limitations for aftercare activities, in order to discuss directions for future development.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All Intensive Care Units in Denmark treating adult patients.

Exclusion criteria

Intensive care units with a specialty field within these four groups:

  • Neurology and neurosurgery
  • Cardiothoracic surgery
  • Pediatrics or neonatology (PICU/NICU)
  • Postoperative care units

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of ICUs offering early aftercare to patients after discharge from ICU

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

    The respondent will choose 'yes' or 'no'

  2. Incidence of ICUs offering late aftercare to patients after discharge from hospital

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

    The respondent will choose 'yes' or 'no'

Secondary outcomes

  1. Size of hospital (number of beds)

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

  2. Size of ICU (number of beds)

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

  3. Early aftercare: Use of protocol or checklist at patient visit

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

    The respondent will choose 'yes' or 'no'

  4. Late aftercare: Use of protocol or checklist at patient visit

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

    The respondent will choose 'yes' or 'no'

  5. Early aftercare: Selection of patients offered aftercare

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

    The respondent will choose from a list of options: All patients, Depending of length of stay, days with mechanical ventilation, or other: the respondent will specify

  6. Late aftercare: Selection of patients offered aftercare

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

    The respondent will choose from a list of options: All patients, Depending of length of stay, days with mechanical ventilation, or other: the respondent will specify

  7. Early aftercare: Time from ICU-discharge to first contact

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

    The respondent will choose from a list of options: How many hours to days until the patient is contacted at the general wards

  8. Late aftercare: Time from hospital discharge to first contact

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

    The respondent will choose from a list of options: How many months from discharge, until the patient is contacted

  9. Early aftercare: Aftercare team members

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

    The respondent will choose from a list of options: The personnel participating in the aftercare: Doctor, nurse, occupational therapist, physical therapist, pharmacist, psychologist or other

  10. Early aftercare: Consumption of time

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

    The respondent will choose from a list of options: How much time is spent (in minutes) pr. contact with the patient

  11. Late aftercare: Aftercare team members

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

    The respondent will choose from a list of options: The personnel participating in the aftercare: Doctor, nurse, occupational therapist, physical therapist, pharmacist, psychologist or other

  12. Late aftercare: Consumption of time

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

    The respondent will choose from a list of options: How much time is spent (in minutes) pr. contact with the patient

  13. Early aftercare: Type of aftercare interventions during general ward stay

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

    The respondent will be choosing interventions from a list, and also be able to specify other interventions not present on the list

  14. Late aftercare: Type of aftercare interventions after hospital discharge

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

    The respondent will be choosing interventions from a list, and also be able to specify other interventions not present on the list

  15. Early aftercare: Type of screening tools or other methods used for patient assessment

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

    The respondent will be choosing screening tools and methods from a list, and also be able to specify other screening tools and methods not present on the list

  16. Late aftercare: Type of screening tools or other methods used for patient assessment

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

    The respondent will be choosing screening tools and methods from a list, and also be able to specify other screening tools and methods not present on the list

  17. Late aftercare: Contact method

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

    The respondent will choose from a list of options: How the ICU contacts the patient after hospital discharge. By phone, by letter, by mail, by digital inbox

  18. Late aftercare: Participation of family members

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

    The respondent will choose from a list: Whether the family is invited to participate in the consultation with the patient or not. Yes/No

  19. Classifications of reasons for not having an aftercare programme at ICUs without an aftercare programme

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

    The respondent will choose from a list of options: Not enough money, resistance from the general wards, not an important subject, and also be able to write their own answer.

  20. The responsible party for the financing of aftercare

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

    The respondent will choose from a list of options: The ICU itself, the general ward, the region or through funds?

  21. The respondent's own assessment of how aftercare will be prioritized at their ICU in one year.

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

    The respondent will choose on a scale: More aftercare? Same level of aftercare? Less aftercare?

  22. Should aftercare be offered?

    Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016

    The respondent will choose on a scale: Totally agree, partially agree, neither agree or disagree, partially disagree, totally disagree

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Zealand University Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Follow-up After Intensive Care Treatment: a Questionnaire Survey of Intensive Care Aftercare in Denmark.

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2017
First posted
May 27, 2016
Registry last updated
Nov 9, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.