Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06075641

Post Gingival Depigmentation Assessment: Comparison of Surgical Stripping vs (Er,Cr:YSGG) Laser

The appearance and health of the gingiva significantly contribute to an aesthetically pleasing smile. Pink gingiva indicates healthy gums and is generally preferred over dark or mixed colors. However, gingival color varies among individuals based on factors such as race, geography, gum health, epithelial thickness, vascular supply, keratinization level, and pigments in the epithelium layers.

Four primary pigments define mucosa color: melanin, oxygenated hemoglobin (Hb), carotenoids, and reduced Hb. Melanin notably affects excessive gingival pigmentation. Gingival melanin hyperpigmentation, sometimes called racial pigmentation, is a genetic trait present in many ethnic groups due to excess melanin deposition in the epithelial layers. While not a medical concern, this hyperpigmentation can be unattractive, especially for those with a gummy smile. As a result, many seek treatments to reduce or eliminate this pigmentation.

Various methods for gingival depigmentation exist, including surgical scraping, scalpel technique, bur abrasion, free gingival graft, gingivectomy, cryosurgery, electrosurgery, chemical treatments, and lasers. A significant challenge with these treatments is gingival repigmentation or the reappearance of melanin post-procedure.

For years, the scalpel technique was the standard. It's a straightforward and economical method that involves removing the gingival epithelium and some underlying tissue. Although it promotes quick healing, the procedure can cause bleeding, necessitating local anesthesia and post-operative dressings. Due to the associated discomfort, researchers have sought equally effective alternatives.

Laser ablation has become a popular choice among dental professionals and patients. Lasers like carbon dioxide (CO2), diode, argon, ruby, Nd:YAG (neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet) , and Er:YAG (erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet) have been proven effective through numerous studies. Lasers present benefits such as minimal post-operative pain, ease of use, and quicker treatment times. Recurrence rates post-laser surgery (1.16%) are lower than with the scalpel technique (4.25%). However, lasers also have downsides, including high costs, potential for thermal damage, and the risk of deep penetration.

One laser, the Erbium-chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG), has been FDA-approved for certain dental procedures but hasn't been widely used for gingival depigmentation. Preliminary findings suggest it offers advantages like reduced pain and faster healing compared to other lasers. In a case study involving two patients, the Er,Cr:YSGG laser effectively removed gingival pigmentation, with no recurrence observed after six months.

This clinical trial aimed to compare the efficacy and recurrence rates between the conventional scalpel technique and the Er,Cr:YSGG laser technique. The hypothesis suggests that the Er,Cr:YSGG laser might be a superior treatment for gingival hyperpigmentation compared to other methods.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Over 18 years of age
  • Periodontally healthy subjects with concerns about their esthetics and presence of gingival hyperpigmentation in the upper arch

Exclusion criteria

  • (1) smokers or were previous smokers
  • (2) had a systemic disease/condition,
  • (3) were pregnant/lactating
  • (4) had gingivitis, periodontitis or any other periodontal disease
  • (5) acquired amalgam pigmentation were excluded from the study

Treatment and study plan

Gingival depigmentation

Procedure

Gingival depigmentation is the most widely used periodontal procedure to remove or reduce the melanotic areas. Various techniques can be employed to effectively carry out the depigmentation procedure, including surgical scraping, scalpel technique, bur abrasion, free gingival graft, gingivectomy, cryosurgery, electrosurgery, chemical therapies, and different types of lasers

Primary outcomes

  1. Oral pigmentation index (DOPI)

    Time frame: Pre surgical, 1 month post op, 12 months post op

    This index of oral pigmentation is the commonly used index due to its simplicity and ease of use. The scores are as follows:

    0 = No clinical pigmentation (pink-colored gingiva)

    • Mild clinical pigmentation (mild light brown color)
    • Moderate clinical pigmentation (medium brown or mixed pink and brown color)
    • Heavy clinical pigmentation (deep brown or bluish black color)
  2. Gingival melanosis record (GMR)

    Time frame: Pre surgical, 1 month post op, 12 months post op

    A quantitative analysis method using clinical oral photographs

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

King Abdulaziz University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Surgical Stripping and Erbium, Chromium:Yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) Laser Techniques for Gingival Depigmentation Recurrence: A Randomized Clinical Trial, Four Years Follow up

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Oct 10, 2023
Registry last updated
Oct 10, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.