City of Hope Medical Center
Duarte, California, 91010, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT05830058
This phase II trial tests the safety of positron emission tomography (PET) guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and how well it works to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that has up to 5 sites of progression (oligoprogression) compared to standard SBRT. SBRT uses special equipment to position a patient and deliver radiation to tumors with high precision. This method may kill tumor cells with fewer doses over a shorter period and cause less damage to normal tissue. A PET scan is an imaging test that looks at your tissues and organs using a small amount of a radioactive substance. It also checks for cancer and may help find cancer remaining in areas already treated. Using a PET scan for SBRT planning may help increase the dose of radiation given to the most resistant part of the cancer in patients with oligoprogressive NSCLC, melanoma, and RCC.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Duarte, California, 91010, United States
Location status: Recruiting
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. PET adaptive SBRT is both feasible and safe and allows for a higher total dose of radiation through an inter-fraction simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) based on inter-fraction PET uptake, leading to improved local control outcomes compared to current standard SBRT planning without a SIB.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Determine the duration of local and distant control followed PET adaptive SBRT treatment compared to standard external beam radiation therapy (EBRT).
II. Evaluate the utility of measuring circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) (ctDNA) before, during and after SBRT in conjuction with biological imaging to assess early disease response.
III. Identify genomic predictors to predict for distant progression. IV. Determine durability of current systemic therapy with SBRT to oligoprogressive sites.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. Biomarker changes based on ctDNA before, during and after treatment. II. Changes in fludeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake with SBRT and combined checkpoint inhibitor during and after treatment and correlation with local and distant control.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Patients undergo 5 SBRT treatments every other day on study. Patients also undergo computed tomography (CT) or PET/CT and blood collection throughout study.
ARM II: Patients undergo 3 SBRT treatments every other day week 1, undergo PET/CT and replanning one month post SBRT, then undergo 2 additional treatments with SIB on study. Patients also undergo CT or PET/CT and blood collection throughout study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Undergo blood collection
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
Undergo CT or PET/CT
Other names: CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial Tomography, Computerized Tomography, CT, CT Scan, tomography
Undergo PET
Other names: Medical Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography, PET, PET Scan, Positron Emission Tomography Scan, Positron-Emission Tomography, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, PT
Ancillary studies
Undergo SBRT
Other names: SABR, SBRT, Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
Time frame: At completion of SBRT up to 5 weeks
Feasibility and safety of biologically-guided adaptive planning based on the standardized uptake value (SUV) on pre-treatment and inter-fraction FDG-PET/CT to guide SBRT dose-escalation with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) delivered to areas of higher activity in patients with oligoprogressive (1-5 sites) disease when compared to the current standard SBRT planning without inter-fraction adaptive planning, with the goal of demonstrating that PET-adaptive inter-fraction planning can improve total dose delivered over the course of treatment. We will be measuring the difference in total radiation dose in Gy between the two arms with the goal of achieving an absolute dose of 10 Gy or higher.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Defined as time of randomization to disease progression at any site or death. Assessed using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST).
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Patient reported outcomes using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - G. Baseline changes in reported QOL will be summarized. Repeated QOL assessments will be tabulated and graphically displayed to describe the changes of QOL outcomes over time, no formal hypothesis testing is planned. An evaluation by dose, response and other characteristics may also be considered. For quantitative QOL scales, data will be represented using means/ medians, histogram/ boxplots. The area under curve will be used as a summary score for each patient. These can then be averaged across groups for informal assessment. Standard imputation methods will be used to deal with a large proportion of missing data.
Time frame: At 3, 6, and 12 months following radiation therapy
Clinician documented toxicity using common terminology for adverse events version 5.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Assessed using the mRECIST.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Defined as the dose delivered in the experimental group for the first 3 fractions versus the dose given for the last 2 fractions.
City of Hope Medical Center
Other
Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial of Biologically Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Oligoprogressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Melanoma, and Renal Cell Carcinoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06265285
Adenocarcinoma, Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04407247
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04314401
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Adnexal Diseases
Daphne, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06418204
Breast Carcinoma, Breast Diseases
Fairbanks, Alaska, United States
View Trial Details