Pomalidomide
DrugChemotherapy
NCT Number: NCT02406222
This study is determining whether the addition of cyclophosphamide to pomalidomide and dexamethasone improves progression free survival in patients with relapsed refractory myeloma (RRMM) compare to pomalidomide and dexamethasone alone. Patients will be randomised on a 1:1 basis to receive CPD or Pd. Treatment will be continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
Multiple myeloma is the second most common hematologic malignancy in the European Union (EU), responsible for an estimated 21,000 deaths in the EU in 2008. For patients that relapse or are refractory to current standard treatment (combination of bortezomib/lenalidomide, dexamethasone and an alkylating agent) there are few options available and therefore the prognosis within this group is often poor with response to treatment decreasing with successive relapses until resistant disease develops. . Current standard treatment at first relapse in the UK is the use of bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone and cyclophosphamide. Another common treatment is lenalidomide given with dexamethasone and cyclophosphamide. The addition of cyclophosphamide has demonstrated to improve treatment outcomes whilst being tolerated well. A recent clinical study has shown the addition of cyclophosphamide to the combination of pomalidomide and dexamethasone has shown to be safe and tolerable and beneficial in terms of treatment outcomes. The primary aim of this study is to investigate whether the addition of cyclophosphamide to pomalidomide and dexamethasone leads to an improved progression free survival. A secondary aim is to identify markers from clinical material that will predict response to pomalidomide in a group of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients to provide important information for use in discussions with NICE on how best to improve the value and use of pomalidomide in the UK in the RRMM setting.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Chemotherapy
Chemotherapy
Chemotherapy
Time frame: From randomisation up to 72 months
To determine whether the addition of cyclophosphamide to pomalidomide and dexamethasone (CPD) improves progression-free survival in patients with relapsed refractory myeloma (RRMM) in the UK, compared to pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Pd) alone
Time frame: From the start of treatment up to 72 months
To determine the maximum response achieved from treatment
Time frame: From the start of treatment up to 72 months
Determine the response to treatment
Time frame: From the start of treatment up to 72 months
Determine any clinical benefit that is derived from treatment
Time frame: From the start of treatment up to 72 months
Determine the time to maximum response to treatment
Time frame: From the start of treatment up to 72 months
Determine the duration that the response to treatment lasts for
Time frame: Date of randomisation to death, up to 72 months
Determine overall survival for all patients that receive treatment
Time frame: From the start of treatment up to end of treatment
Measured by treatment delays and missed treatment doses
Time frame: Time of registration to 28 days post treatment discontinuation
Measured by adverse reactions and serious adverse event reporting
University of Leeds
Other
Acronym: MUKseven
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01562405
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05911321
Aging, Blood Protein Disorders
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04176718
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05675449
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial Details