Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00719355

Polestriding Versus Walking for Subjects With Poor Leg Circulation

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of polestriding (walking with poles) and traditional walking on physical endurance in subjects with poor circulation in their legs. Another goal is to evaluate the effectiveness of a walking program in increasing the amount of oxygen in the calf muscles and therefore improving overall physical activity and quality of life.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital

Hines, Illinois, 60141, United States

About this study

Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD/PVD) is caused by decreased blood flow to the legs. The most common symptom is intermittent claudication pain during walking that is relieved by rest. Walking is the primary treatment prescribed for PAD rehabilitation. Polestriding uses muscles of the upper and lower body in a continuous movement. Walking with poles increases stride length, cadence and walking speed and decreases ground reaction forces on the joints. Subjects in this study will participate in a walking program with or without poles.

Dr. Collins' research focuses on physical activity interventions to improve the functional status of persons with chronic illness. Several rehabilitation studies have tested the efficacy of walking exercise for patients with PAD. Studies on polestriding indicate that it may be superior to traditional walking, but these two methods have never been compared. Approximately 30% of patients with coronary artery disease have PAD as their only symptom. As the population ages and more people are affected by this debilitating condition, nurse-initiated rehabilitative therapies, such as polestriding, need to be explored. The consent form explains the purpose of the study in addition to the procedures, risks, benefits, options, confidentiality, costs, and compensation. Participants are also asked to sign a HIPPA authorization.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Peripheral Vascular Disease
  • Cramping/Claudication Pain in legs while walking
  • Ankle Brachial Index (measure of circulation by doppler) .90 or less

Exclusion criteria

  • Ulcers or sores on feet or legs
  • Unable to walk or confined to a wheelchair
  • Amputations or severe arthritis pain in shoulders, knees, or hips
  • Medical conditions which would exclude subject from participating in an exercise program
  • Vascular Surgery within the last six months, or planning vascular surgery

Treatment and study plan

Walking with poles

Behavioral

Patients walked with poles, 20-45 minutes, 3 times/week for 24 weeks.

Other names: Exercise

Walking exercise

Behavioral

Patients walked for 20-45 minutes, 3 times/week for 24 weeks.

Other names: Exercise

Primary outcomes

  1. Length of Exercise Duration on the Treadmill Constant Work Rate Exercise Test

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

    Patients walked on the CWR test at 85% of his/her peak VO2 on the baseline progressive treadmill test. Since the polewalking group was older than the walking group, subject age was entered into the analysis as a co-variate. Intent-to-treat (ITT) analyses were used. The last measurement taken for all subjects with at least one follow-up test was carried forward (n=97).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Onset of Claudication Pain During Constant Work Rate Treadmill Test

    Time frame: At 24 weeks

    Perceived pain onset was recorded during the constant workrate test using the Borg ratio scale. Patient rated their pain from 0-10. Time elapased on the treadmill (minutes) at the onset of pain was recorded.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Illinois at Chicago

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)

Registry information

Official study title

Polestriding Versus Walking for PAD Rehabilitation

Important dates

Study start
2005
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2011
First posted
Jul 21, 2008
Registry last updated
Feb 12, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.