Children's Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55404, United States
NCT Number: NCT03360643
Pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians are increasingly utilizing point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). There is currently limited data regarding POCUS evaluation for intussusception in pediatric patients. To better understand the role of POCUS for identification of intussusception, the investigators plan to conduct a randomized, noninferiority study comparing POCUS and radiology-performed ultrasound (RADUS), utilizing experienced sonographers across multiple institutions.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me3 month–6 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55404, United States
Intussusception is the most common causes of bowel obstruction among children less than 6 years of age. Limited abdominal ultrasonography is recommended as the initial screening study, prior to enema or surgical reduction for definitive treatment. Although ultrasonography is typically performed by ultrasound technicians and interpreted by radiologists, recently published guidelines include identification of intussusception as an adjunct POCUS application for emergency physicians to use at the bedside.
Two previous studies have investigated POCUS use by PEM physicians for the diagnosis of intussusception, both of which largely incorporated novice sonographers with limited training in bowel ultrasonography. Only one previous prospective investigation has investigated POCUS for the identification of intussusception, with a reported POCUS sensitivity of 85% (95% confidence interval 54-97%) and specificity of 97% (95% confidence interval 89-99%) when compared to RADUS. In contrast, the sensitivity and specificity of RADUS have been reported to range from 98-100% and 88-98%, respectively, when compared to enema or surgical reduction. Given the limited evidence available, it remains unclear whether POCUS performs similar to RADUS in terms of diagnostic accuracy.
The primary aim of this study is to determine whether POCUS is noninferior to RADUS for the detection of intussusception. The secondary aims are to determine whether rates of serious complications or resource utilization measures differ among patients randomly assigned to receive POCUS prior to RADUS or RADUS alone. The investigators hypothesize that diagnostic accuracy, expressed as sensitivity and specificity, is similar for POCUS and RADUS, and that rates of serious complications and resource utilization measures do not differ across groups.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Point-of-care ultrasound performed by pediatric emergency medicine physicians prior to radiology-performed ultrasound
Ultrasound performed an ultrasound technician and/or radiologist, and interpreted by a radiologist
Time frame: 2 years from start of enrollment
Time frame: 2 years from start of enrollment
The number of patients with recurrent intussusception in each study arm
Time frame: 2 years from start of enrollment
The number of patients with peritonitis in each study arm
Time frame: 2 years from start of enrollment
The number of patients with bowel perforation in each study arm
Time frame: 2 years from start of enrollment
The number of patients with intestinal obstruction in each study arm
Time frame: 2 years from start of enrollment
The number of patients with shock in each study arm
Time frame: 2 years from start of enrollment
The number of deaths in each study arm
Time frame: 2 years from start of enrollment
Time frame: 2 years from start of enrollment
Time frame: 2 years from start of enrollment
The total number of laboratory investigations obtained per patient
Time frame: 2 years after start of enrollment
The total number of radiology studies obtained per patient
Time frame: 3 days after the index ED visit
Return ED visit 3 days after index ED visit
Time frame: 7 days after the index ED visit
Return ED visit 7 days after index ED visit
Time frame: 2 years from start of enrollment
Ileocolic intussusception will be identified by a maximal cross-sectional diameter of greater than or equal to 2.5 cm; and ileoileal intussusception will be considered less than 2.5 cm in maximal cross-sectional diameter
Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota
Other
Point-of-Care Ultrasonography for Intussusception: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02052063
Digestive System Diseases, Gastrointestinal Diseases
Rouen, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05640375
Digestive System Diseases, Gastrointestinal Diseases
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06365333
Digestive System Diseases, Gastrointestinal Diseases
Hanoi, Vietnam
View Trial DetailsNCT06351163
Digestive System Diseases, Gastrointestinal Diseases
Hanoi, Vietnam
View Trial Details