Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06042127

POEM-F for Achalasia International Study

Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has emerged as the endoscopic treatment of choice for achalasia, offering comparable symptom relief with laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy. The main concern with POEM is the higher incidence of post-procedure gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), occurring in up to 50-60% of patients. In order to reduce the risk of GERD, endoscopic fundoplication has been developed as a novel procedure mimicking surgical anterior partial fundoplication that can be performed in the same session as POEM (POEM-F). Case series of POEM-F in patients with achalasia reported encouraging outcomes of low GERD rate of ~12% at 1 year. Prospective comparative data between POEM-F and conventional POEM on post-procedure GERD is current lacking. The investigators therefore designed an international multicenter prospective randomized study to investigate the efficacy of POEM-F. The investigators postulate that POEM-F could reduce the incidence of post-procedure GERD when compared with conventional POEM.

This is an international multicenter randomized controlled trial conducted between high volume expert centers from Hong Kong SAR, China, India and United States of America. Adult patients with manometry confirmed achalasia would be randomised to undergo POEM-F or POEM. The procedure would be performed by experts with vast experience in POEM. The primary outcome is the incidence of post-procedure GERD at 1 year, defined by the updated Lyon consensus. Secondary outcomes include technical and clinical success rates, adverse events, post-POEM endoscopic and manometry findings as well as patients' symptom scores.

Sample size calculation Based on existing pilot comparative data on POEM-F and POEM, it is estimated that 84 patients would be required to demonstrate a difference in post-procedure GERD of 47.6% to 18.2%, with 80% power and false positive rate of 0.05, accounting for 10% loss to follow-up.

Purpose and potential The current study proposal could demonstrate the superiority of POEM-F over POEM in reducing post-procedural GERD. It would also demonstrate the safety and reproducibility of the technique in expert centers across the globe. It could potentially replace conventional POEM as the preferred minimally invasive endoscopic treatment for achalasia.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Achalasia is the most common esophageal motility disorder worldwide, with an annual incidence of 1.6 per 100'000 individual and prevalence of 10 per 100'000 population. The incidence of achalasia has been dramatically rising over the past decade. A study conducted in Chicago suggested that over the 10 years from 2004 to 2014, the incidence and prevalence of achalasia were two- to threefold greater than estimates would have predicted. The likely explanation to the rise in incidence is an increased awareness of this condition and widespread availability of accurate diagnostic test with high resolution manometry. The cardinal features of achalasia include failed relaxation of lower esophageal sphincter and absent esophageal peristalsis. Owing to the benign nature of the disease, patients suffering from it would experience longstanding debilitating symptoms of dysphagia, chest pain, regurgitation, resulting in poor quality of life. In the past, laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy with partial fundoplication and endoscopic pneumatic dilatation were considered as treatment options for achalasia.

In the past 10 years, per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has emerged as the incisionless minimally invasive endoscopic treatment of choice for achalasia. This Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgical (NOTES) technique involves mucosal incision and creation of a submucosal tunnel in the distal esophagus down to gastric cardia, followed by esophageal and gastric myotomy. Since the procedure was first reported by Inoue H, et al in 2010, it has seen worldwide acceptance as first-line therapy. POEM has been associated with excellent relief of dysphagia and achalasia-related symptoms with a low and acceptable adverse event rate of 0.5%. In a previous randomised controlled trial, POEM had a higher treatment success rate than pneumatic dilatation. When compared with laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy, POEM was associated with at least similar treatment efficacy and a trend towards reduced short term adverse event. POEM could perform even better than surgical myotomy in patients with type III achalasia.

The main limitation of POEM is the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) post-POEM. Kumbhari et al. looked at rates of GERD after POEM on patients who underwent subsequent objective pH testing. A total of 282 patients were included in this analysis from multiple centers in America, Asia, and Europe. About 58% of patients had objective evidence of abnormal acid exposure, with 23% showing evidence of esophagitis. More concerning, however, was that 60% of the patients with GERD were completely asymptomatic. This highlights an important issue at hand that many patients, either related to the propensity of GERD to be silent or the nature of achalasia to develop and insensate esophagus, do not report symptoms while showing high rates of GERD. POEM has been found to be consistently associated with higher rate of GERD than conventional Heller's cardiomyotomy or pneumatic dilatation across multiple studies.

Supported by evidence demonstrating the efficacy of partial fundoplication during Heller's operation, there has been a significant interest in performing fundoplication after POEM during the same session to prevent the development of post-POEM GERD. Inoue et al. pioneered the technique of POEM-F that mimics the surgical Dor (anterior partial fundoplication) procedure. In the pilot study, technical success was achieved in all 21 patients, and all but one had an intact fundoplication wrap on upper endoscopy at a 1-month follow-up. Four more studies conducted in Japan and India have reported good early outcomes with POEM-F (Technical success of 85-100%) for achalasia. No severe adverse event has been reported in these studies which reiterates the safety of this procedure. In the longest follow-up study on POEM-F, GERD diagnosed by an abnormal esophageal acid exposure was seen in 11.1% of the 21 cases at one-year follow-up: comparable (8.8%) to a large meta-analysis of 4871 Heller's cardiomyotomy with fundoplication procedures.

To date, no prospective multicenter randomised study has been conducted to compare the efficacy of POEM-F with conventional POEM in reducing post-procedure GERD. Therefore, in this study, the investigators aim to evaluate the of POEM-F in patients with achalasia through an international multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patient (age ≥18 and ≤65 years-old) and with symptomatic achalasia type I or II.
  • Capability of understanding and complying with the study requirements, including filling the Eckardt Score, GERD-HRQL and RSI questionnaire and signing the informed consent form.
  • Patients with achalasia type I, II or III who are one of the following:
  • Treatment naïve, or
  • Failed prior through-the-scope balloon dilation, Savary or pneumatic dilation

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients unable or unwilling to provide consent.
  • Previous esophageal or gastric surgery.
  • Prior achalasia treatment including Heller myotomy, POEM.
  • Sigmoid achalasia, or significant esophageal dilatation >6cm in lower esophagus
  • Disrupted mucosal integrity at the distal esophagus, eg. Ulcer, fibrotic scars etc
  • Patients with large hiatal hernias (axial length > 2 cm and Hill grade >2).
  • Patients with significant cardiorespiratory comorbidities which may limit their ability to undertake general anesthesia for the procedure, including ASA grade III or above.
  • Patients with obesity (Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 30).
  • Pregnant women or those planning pregnancy or breastfeeding women.
  • Uncorrectable coagulopathy defined by international normalized ratio (INR) > 1.5 or platelet count < 50000/µl.

Treatment and study plan

POEM-F

Procedure

POEM-F would be performed as described in the arms section

Conventional POEM

Procedure

Anterior POEM performed as described in the arms section

Primary outcomes

  1. Post-procedure rate of gastroesophageal reflux

    Time frame: 1 year

    Defined by updated Lyon 2.0 consensus as fulfilling one or more of the criteria:

    • Endoscopic erosive esophagitis, LA grade B or above
    • Long segment Barrett's esophagus
    • Peptic esophageal stricture
    • 24-hour pH study with acid exposure time >6% Both endoscopy and pH study to be performed with proton pump inhibitor stopped for 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical success rate of procedure

    Time frame: 1 year

    Post-treatment Eckhardt score <=3

  2. Adverse event of procedure

    Time frame: 30 day

    frequency of severe adverse events with probable or definite attribution to the procedure based on the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) lexicon as well as Clavien Dindo classification

  3. Technical success rate of procedure

    Time frame: 1 day

    Completing all steps of the intended procedure successfully in the same session

  4. Procedure time

    Time frame: 1 day

    Procedure time of the intended procedure in minutes

  5. Erosive esophagitis on post-procedure endoscopy

    Time frame: 1 year

    The presence of erosive esophagitis as well as the grading on post-procedure endoscopy

  6. Fundoplication wrap integrity on post-procedure endoscopy

    Time frame: 1 year

    Endoscopic appearance of fundoplication wrap on retroflexion in the stomach.

    • Intact - wrap is completely visualised
    • Indistinct - wrap is visualised but appears to be loosened
    • Absent - the wrap is completely not visible
  7. Distensibility index on EndoFLIP, premyotomy

    Time frame: During index procedure, before myotomy

    Distensibility index (mm2/mmHg) using EndoFLIP

  8. Distensibility index on EndoFLIP, post myotomy

    Time frame: During index procedure, after myotomy

    Distensibility index (mm2/mmHg) using EndoFLIP

  9. Distensibility index on EndoFLIP, post fundoplication

    Time frame: During index procedure, after fundoplication

    Distensibility index (mm2/mmHg) using EndoFLIP

  10. Distensibility index on EndoFLIP, on follow-up

    Time frame: 1 year

    Distensibility index (mm2/mmHg) using EndoFLIP, at follow-up endoscopy

  11. Maximum diameter on EndoFLIP, premyotomy

    Time frame: During index procedure, before myotomy

    Maximum diameter (mm) on EndoFLIP

  12. Maximum diameter on EndoFLIP, post-myotomy

    Time frame: During index procedure, after myotomy

    Maximum diameter (mm) on EndoFLIP

  13. Maximum diameter on EndoFLIP, post-fundoplication

    Time frame: During index procedure, after fundoplication

    Maximum diameter (mm) on EndoFLIP

  14. Maximum diameter on EndoFLIP, on follow-up

    Time frame: 1 year

    Maximum diameter (mm) on EndoFLIP, at follow-up endoscopy

  15. GERD-HRQL score

    Time frame: 1 month, 3 month, 6 month and 1 year

    Symptom and quality of life score relating to GERD The score ranged from 0-50 with higher score signifying more severe GERD symptom / worse quality of life

  16. GERD-RSI score

    Time frame: 1 month, 3 month, 6 month and 1 year

    Symptom and quality of life score relating to GERD The score ranged from 0-45 with higher score signifying more severe GERD symptom

  17. GERD-Q score

    Time frame: 1 month, 3 month, 6 month and 1 year

    Symptom and quality of life score relating to GERD The score is ranged from 0-18 with the higher score signifying more symptom of GERD

  18. Use of proton pump inhibitor post-procedure

    Time frame: 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, and 1 year

    Number of participants who are on regular / as required / not on PPI

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Hon Chi Yip, FRCSEd

CONTACT

[email protected]

35052627

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Other

Collaborators

  • Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India
  • Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
  • Northwestern University
  • Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh

Registry information

Official study title

Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy With Fundoplication for Achalasia - an International Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2026
First posted
Sep 18, 2023
Registry last updated
Dec 3, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.