Sakarya Training and Research Hospital
Sakarya, Adapazarı, 54100, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06887400
Introduction and Objective: This study aimed to reveal the effect of classical triage and Bedside Focused Ultrasonography (POCUS) in addition to classical triage on diagnosis, treatment, emergency department follow-up and its relationship with triage models in patients presenting to the emergency department with abdominal pain complaints.
METHOD: This randomized, controlled, prospective study was conducted with a total of 262 volunteer participants who were divided into two groups as 127 classical triage and 135 POCUS in addition to classical triage with non-traumatic abdominal pain. The decision of which participant would be included in which group was made at a 1:1 ratio using a computer-aided randomization table. The researcher did not intervene in the clinical processes in any way. In this study, the effect of POCUS application performed in addition to classical triage on clinical processes (imaging request, initial analgesia administration time, consultation request, emergency department stay and outcome) in the primary outcome and on triage systems in the secondary outcome were evaluated. IBM SPSS 21.0 software was used for statistical analysis of the data.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Sakarya, Adapazarı, 54100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
In this study, POCUS was performed by the same emergency medicine physician who had basic and advanced USG training and at least two years of POCUS experience, in accordance with ACEP imaging protocols. A portable USG device with B-Mode, M-Mode, Color Doppler, Power Doppler, Pulsed Wave Doppler modes, and which can be used in all clinical modes with a single probe was used during the protocol application (Butterfly iQ+™, Burlington, United States). Eight abdominal points (epigastric region, right upper quadrant, right side, right lower quadrant, suprapubic region, left lower quadrant, left side and upper quadrant, umbilical region) were scanned with POCUS, the findings were recorded on the previously prepared form, the triage categories of the patients (cl) were updated and the patients were directed to the area where they would be examined with the form.
Time frame: 6 months
To evaluate the effect of adding the POCUS application to conventional triage on clinical processes, including imaging requests, time to initial analgesia.
Time frame: 6 months
To evaluate the effect of adding the POCUS application to conventional triage on imaging requests.
Time frame: 6 months
To evaluate the effect of adding POCUS to conventional triage on the length of stay of patients in the emergency department.
Time frame: 6 months
To determine the diagnostic sensitivity of POCUS performed during triage using the final reports of patients who requested imaging.
Time frame: 6 months
To examine the categorization changes after POCUS with the emergency severity index before POCUS application.
Time frame: 6 months
To examine the categorization changes after POCUS with Manchester triage system before POCUS application.
Time frame: 6 months
To examine the categorization changes after POCUS with 3-group triage system before POCUS application
Sakarya University
Other
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Focused Point-of-Care Ultrasonography Triage and Classical Triage in Patients Applying to The Emergency Department With Abdominal Pain
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06853782
Abdominal Pain, Abdominal Pain (AP)
Ankara, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06917612
Abdominal Pain, Abdominal Pain (AP)
View Trial DetailsNCT02565355
Abdominal Pain, Abdominal Pain (AP)
View Trial DetailsNCT07636980
Abdominal Pain, Abdominal Pain (AP)
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial Details