Hospital Garcia de Orta
Lisbon, Almada, 2801-267, Portugal
NCT Number: NCT05336448
This is a prospective study that aims to assess the differences in point-of-care ultrasound assessment (POCUS) with portable and ultra-portable devices, using conventional vs artificial intelligence (AI) methodologies, performed by experienced vs inexperienced physicians, in critically ill patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Lisbon, Almada, 2801-267, Portugal
Convenient sample size up to 100 patients
Exclusion criteria
Patients with atrial fibrillation or other dysrhythmias; Inappropriate acoustic window for ultrasound assessment
c. Devices used The study in question aims to perform an ultrasound using two ultrasound scanners belonging to the Intensive Care Department:
In the 4-chamber apical window (A4C), the following variables should be evaluated (by a physician experienced in echocardiography), with the
Butterfly iQ+ device and then with the VenueTM:
discrete quantitative variable, expressed in cm; refers to manual measurement of the LVOT VTI. In the A5C window, the following variables should be evaluated (by a physician experienced in echocardiography and an inexperienced physician), with the VenueTM device:
VenueTM device, the following variables:
Regarding the echocardiographic assessment, experienced physicians should determine the echographic variables in a conventional way (manual) and also through an automatic methodology, first using the Butterfly iQ+ device and later the VenueTM device. Non-experienced physicians will only perform the determination of variables using the automatic methodology (therefore only the variables for which this option is available). The collection of parameters related to the echocardiographic evaluation will be performed in a previously established order in order to avoid bias in subsequent comparisons. Blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and peripheral oxygen saturation should be recorded during the ultrasound assessment. Regarding laboratory variables, the results available in the analysis of the patient on the day of the ultrasound evaluation will be considered (an additional study will not be requested if any of the measurements has not been previously requested by the attending physician). Any need for vasopressor, inotropic or invasive mechanical ventilation should also be recorded. e) Collection and recording of data Demographic and clinical variables will be collected using the patients' clinical records. The variables referring to the ultrasound assessment will be recorded at the time of their acquisition in the CRF.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: up to 48 weeks
Assess the accuracy of automatic measurements to determine ultrasound parameters using portable versus ultra-portable ultrasound scanners.
Hospital Garcia de Orta
Other
POCUS Artificial Intelligence With Portable and Ultraportable Ultrasound Devices in Critically Ill Patients
Acronym: PocusAI-Crit
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04612348
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03195127
Chronic Disease, Critical Illness
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07020637
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07579728
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details