Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04986709

PMCF Study in Patients With Acute or Chronic Aortic Dissection or Aortic Aneurysm Treated With E-vita OPEN NEO

The NEOS-APAC post-market clinical follow-up study is undertaken to demonstrate the safety and clinical performance of E-vita OPEN NEO in the treatment of aneurysm or dissection in the ascending aorta, aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia

Loading trial locations.

About this study

In this study, patients will be observed who receive an E-vita OPEN NEO implant for the treatment of thoracic aneurysm or acute or chronic thoracic dissection. E-vita OPEN NEO will be implanted according to the instructions for use and at the discretion of the treating physician. Participating physicians will provide their observations collected during routine care for patients treated with E-vita OPEN NEO. Written informed consent, specifically allowing the use of clinical records for this observational study, will be obtained from every patient prior to data collection. The period of data collection will be approximately 24 months from the date of intervention for each patient. Source data verification will be performed on 100% of the patients; data from all the visits that was provided in the database will be reviewed and verified against existing source documents. Complete DICOM image files of the CT scans will be sent to the CoreLab for independent evaluation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient´s age is between 18 and 75 years.
  • Patient is willing and able to comply with the standard follow-up visits planned after the implantation procedure.
  • Patient is willing and able to give informed consent.
  • Patient satisfies one of the following categories:
  • Patient has acute / subacute aortic dissection and requires repair or replacement of damaged or diseased vessels of the aortic arch (with or without involvement of the ascending aorta), and the descending aorta requires treatment, or, in the opinion of the investigator, the patient would derive clinical benefit from prophylactic treatment of the descending aorta.
  • Patient has chronic aortic dissection which requires repair or replacement of damaged or diseased vessels of the aortic arch and descending aorta with or without involvement of the ascending aorta, and the patient satisfies one or more of the following criteria:

Patient has aortic sinus, or ascending aorta, or aortic arch, or descending aorta diameter ≥ 5.5 cm. Patient has aorta diameter < 5.5 cm and a growth rate of ≥ 0.5 cm / year. Patient has ascending aorta diameter ≥ 4.5 cm and requires an aortic valve repair or replacement. Patient has clinical signs of abdominal or peripheral malperfusion.

  • Patient has a fusiform or saccular aortic aneurysm which requires repair or replacement of damaged or diseased vessels of the aortic arch and descending aorta with or without involvement of the ascending aorta, and patient satisfies the following criteria:

Patient has a suitable distal sealing area in the descending thoracic aorta proximal to the celiac trunk.

And in case of fusiform aneurysm one of the following characteristics:

Patient has aortic sinus, or ascending aorta, or aortic arch, or descending aorta diameter ≥ 5.5 cm. Patient has aorta diameter < 5.5 cm and a growth rate of ≥ 0.5 cm / year. Patient has ascending aorta diameter ≥ 4.5 cm and requires an aortic valve repair or replacement.

  • Patient is hemodynamically stable without pharmacological support at time of admission to the hospital (stable blood pressure and heart rate, no shock).

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient is unfit for open surgical repair involving circulatory arrest.
  • Patient has known sensitivities or allergies to nitinol, polyester, platinumiridium, or polyethylene.
  • Patient has systemic infection.
  • Patient has endocarditis or active infection of the aorta.
  • Patient has a free ruptured aorta.
  • Patient has acute stroke or suspected acute stroke.
  • Patient is on inotropes at time of arrival to the hospital.
  • Patient needs mitral valve repair or replacement.
  • Patient is enrolled or plans to be enrolled in another active study.
  • Patient is pregnant or breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant during the course of the study.
  • Patient has uncorrectable bleeding anomaly (i.e., thrombocytopenia).
  • Patient has an eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.73m2 before the intervention
  • Patient has known sensitivity to radiopaque contrast agents that cannot be adequately pre-treated.
  • Patient has co-morbidity (i.e. active malignancy (progressive, stable or partial remission)) causing expected survival to be less than 3 years.
  • Patient has any other medical, social or psychological problems, that in the opinion of the investigator, preclude the patient from participating in this study.

Treatment and study plan

Open repair

Device

Open repair of the aortic arch and descending aorta with or without involvment of the ascending aorta using a hybrid graft.

Primary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    Time frame: 30-day

    Rate of all-cause mortality

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of all-cause mortality

  2. Mortality

    Time frame: 30-day, 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of aortic related mortality

  3. Major Adverse Events

    Time frame: 12 months

    Rate of patients who are free from Major Adverse Events (MAEs) (new permanent disabling stroke (mRS ≥ 2 and at baseline mRS < 2), new permanent (> 30 days) paraplegia or paraparesis, reintervention (excluding reoperation for bleeding or planned or unplanned additional intervention), all-cause mortality)

  4. Device technical success

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Rate of patients with device technical success

  5. Procedural success

    Time frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days

    Rate of patients with procedural success

  6. Treatment success

    Time frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6,12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with treatment success

  7. Aortic rupture

    Time frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with aortic rupture

  8. Additional intervention

    Time frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with planned or unplanned additional intervention

  9. Reintervention

    Time frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with reintervention

  10. Disabling stroke

    Time frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with new disabling stroke

  11. Paraplegia

    Time frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with new permanent (> 30 days) paraplegia

  12. Paraparesis

    Time frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with new permanent (> 30 days) paraparesis

  13. Renal failure

    Time frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with renal failure requiring permanent (> 90 days) dialysis or hemofiltration in a patient with a normal pre-procedure serum creatinine level

  14. Aortic regurgitation

    Time frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with increase in aortic regurgitation grade of greater than 1 compared to pre-operative measurement

  15. Stenosis

    Time frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with stenosis in the supra-aortic head vessels (0 - 30 %, >30 % - 50 %, > 50 % - 70%, > 70%)

  16. Patency

    Time frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with patent supra-aortic head vessels

  17. Migration

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with retrograde migration > 10 mm of the distal end of the stented part of E-vita OPEN NEO

  18. Integrity

    Time frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with failure of integrity of the E-vita OPEN NEO

  19. Endoleak type Ib (aneurysm)

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with aneurysm that have an endoleak type Ib

  20. Endoleak type II (aneurysm)

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with aneurysm that have an endoleak type II

  21. Endoleak type III (aneurysm)

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with aneurysm that have an endoleak type III

  22. Endoleak type IV (aneurysm)

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with aneurysm that have an endoleak type IV

  23. Increasing aortic diameter

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with aneurysm that have an increasing maximum aortic diameter in the stented region (E-vita OPEN NEO) compared to first post-operative CT

  24. Stable aortic diameter

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with aneurysm that have a stable maximum aortic diameter in the stented region (E-vita OPEN NEO) compared to first post-operative CT

  25. Decreasing aortic diameter

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with aneurysm that have a decreasing maximum aortic diameter in the stented region (E-vita OPEN NEO) compared to first post-operative CT

  26. Endoleak type Ib (dissection)

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with dissection that have an endoleak type Ib

  27. Endoleak II (dissection)

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with dissection that have an endoleak type II

  28. Endoleak type R (dissection)

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with dissection that have an endoleak type R

  29. Increasing or stable true lumen size

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with increasing (≥ 5 mm) or stable true lumen in the stented region

  30. Stable or decreasing false lumen size

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with stable or decreasing (≤ - 5 mm) false lumen in the stented region

  31. Obliterated false lumen in stented region

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with obliterated false lumen in the stented region

  32. Completely thrombosed false lumen in stented region

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with completely thrombosed false lumen in the stented region

  33. Partially thrombosed false lumen in stented region

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with partially thrombosed false lumen in the stented region

  34. Patent false lumen in stented region

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with patent false lumen in the stented region

  35. Obliterated false lumen between stent and celiac trunk

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with obliterated false lumen between the bottom of the stent and the celiac trunk

  36. Completely thrombosed false lumen between stent and celiac trunk

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with completely thrombosed false lumen between the bottom of the stent and the celiac trunk

  37. Partially thrombosed false lumen between stent and celiac trunk

    Time frame: Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with partially thrombosed false lumen between the bottom of the stent and the celiac trunk

  38. Patent false lumen between stent and celiac trunk

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with patent false lumen between the bottom of the stent and the celiac trunk

  39. Obliterated false lumen between celiac trunk and aortic bifurcation

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with obliterated false lumen between the celiac trunk and the aortic bifurcation

  40. Completely thrombosed false lumen between celiac trunk and aortic bifurcation

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with completely thrombosed false lumen between the celiac trunk and the aortic bifurcation

  41. Partially thrombosed false lumen between celiac trunk and aortic bifurcation

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with partially thrombosed false lumen between the celiac trunk and the aortic bifurcation

  42. Patent false lumen between celiac trunk and aortic bifurcation

    Time frame: 3-6, 12, 24 months

    Rate of patients with patent false lumen between the celiac trunk and the aortic bifurcation

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

JOTEC GmbH

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

NEOS-APAC - Asian Pacific Post-market Clinical Follow-up Study in Patients With Acute or Chronic Aortic Dissection or Aortic Aneurysm Treated With E-vita OPEN NEO

Acronym: NEOS-APAC

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2027
First posted
Aug 3, 2021
Registry last updated
Feb 8, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.