Adroit Guiding Catheter, Cordis Transradial Access Devices, Cordis Diagnostic Catheters, Cordis Guidewires
DeviceObservation
NCT Number: NCT05543096
This Post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) study is designed as retrospective, multi-center study to collect real-life data.
A multi-center design is used to ensure a representative sample of the physicians who have performed the procedure and to provide a reasonable enrolment period for the required data to be collected.
The rationale of this study is to confirm and support the clinical safety and performance of any of these products in a real-word population of 200 patients who underwent an endovascular intervention within standard-of-care (SOC) where at least 1 of the products (named above) from Cordis US Corp were used.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Kepler Universitätsklinikum GmbH, Linz, Austria
Treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) is dependent on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). PCI includes a group of minimally invasive (non-surgical) procedures to treat narrowing of the coronary arteries and therefore restore arterial blood flow. PCI techniques have significantly improved over time1 and requires cardiac catherterization and an experienced physician. In the field of catheters, there are a variety of options from Diagnostic Catheters, Guiding Catheters, Guidewires or even Transradial Acces Devices1-5.
All devices have different advantages and disadvantages and an appropriate selection is a requirement for successful angioplasty of coronary artery lesions2,3. Which device to choose depends on the anatomy of the vessel, the type of lesion and the technique used for the treatment. The different Catheters and Access Devices (Diagnostic Catheters, Guiding Catheters, Guidewires and Transradial Acces Devices) have proven their functionality and safety over the years and have become widely accepted supportive devices for the treatment of coronary atery disease. For example, the technical sucess for Diagnostic Catheters is high with about 95% technical success and about 100% procedural succes6-17.
In this regard, the purpose of the current post market surveillance trial is to assess the safety and efficacy of different devices from Cordis (Adroit Guiding Catheter, Cordis Transradial Access Devices, Cordis Diagnostic Cathheters, and Cordis Guidewires). The devices under investigation in the current study are the Adroit Guiding Catheter, Cordis Transradial Access Devices (RAIN Sheath and Avanti Plus Transradial Kit), Cordis Diagnostic Cathheters (Super Torque, Super Torque MB, Super Torque Plus, Infiniti 4F, Infiniti 5F/6F, Tempo 4F, Tempo Aqua, High Flow and Pigtail Straightener), Cordis Guidewires (ATW, Stabilizer, Wizdom), which are described in detail in section 3.1.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Observation
Time frame: 30 days after procedure
Freedom from SAEs and SADEs during the procedure and up to 30 days after the procedure
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, instroduction and deployment of Adroit Guiding Catheter according to the IFU and without device related deficiencies
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, instroduction and deployment of Cordis Transradial Access Device RAIN Sheath according to the IFU and without device related deficiencies
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, instroduction and deployment of Cordis Transradial Access Device Avanti Plus Transradial Kit according to the IFU and without device related deficiencies
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, instroduction and deployment of Cordis Diagnostic Cathheter Super Torque according to the IFU and without device related deficiencies
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, instroduction and deployment of Cordis Diagnostic Cathheter Super Torque MB according to the IFU and without device related deficiencies
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, instroduction and deployment of Cordis Diagnostic Cathheter Super Torque Plus according to the IFU and without device related deficiencies
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, instroduction and deployment of Cordis Diagnostic Cathheter Infiniti 4F according to the IFU and without device related deficiencies
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, instroduction and deployment of Cordis Diagnostic Cathheter Infiniti 5F/6F according to the IFU and without device related deficiencies
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, instroduction and deployment of Cordis Diagnostic Cathheter Tempo 4F according to the IFU and without device related deficiencies
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, instroduction and deployment of Cordis Diagnostic Cathheter Tempo Aqua according to the IFU and without device related deficiencies
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, instroduction and deployment of Cordis Diagnostic Cathheter High FLow according to the IFU and without device related deficiencies
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, instroduction and deployment of Cordis Diagnostic Cathheter Pigtail Straightener according to the IFU and without device related deficiencies
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, instroduction and deployment of Cordis Guidewire ATW according to the IFU and without device related deficiencies
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, instroduction and deployment of Cordis Guidewire Stabilizer according to the IFU and without device related deficiencies
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, instroduction and deployment of Cordis Guidewire Wizdom according to the IFU and without device related deficiencies
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, introduction and deployment of Vista Brite Tip Guiding Catheter according to the respective IFU and without device related deficiencies
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, introduction and deployment of Cordis vascular access device RAILWAY Shealthless Access System according to the respective IFU and without device related deficiencies
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, introduction and deployment of Cordis vascular access device Avanti+ according to the respective IFU and without device related deficiencies
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, introduction and deployment of Cordis vascular access device Brite - Tip according to the respective IFU and without device related deficiencies
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, introduction and deployment of Cordis vascular access device Vista Brite IG according to the respective IFU and without device related deficiencies
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, introduction and deployment of Cordis vascular access device Vessel Dilator according to the respective IFU and without device related deficiencies
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, introduction and deployment of Cordis vascular closure device MynxGrip according to the respective IFU and without device related deficiencies
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, introduction and deployment of Cordis vascular closure device Mynx Control according to the respective IFU and without device related deficiencies
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate defined as successful crossing, introduction and deployment of Cordis Guidewire Emerald according to the respective IFU and without device related deficiencies.
Cordis US Corp.
Industry
A Retrospective PMCF Study Evaluating the Safety and Clinical Performance of the Adroit Guiding Catheter, the Cordis Transradial Access Devices (RAIN Sheath and Avanti Plus Transradial Kit), the Cordis Diagnostic Catheters (Super Torque, Super Torque MB, Super Torque Plus, Infiniti 4F, Infiniti 5F/6F, Tempo 4F, Tempo Aqua, High Flow and Pigtail Straightener) and the Cordis Guidewires (ATW, Stabilizer and Wizdom) for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07468955
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Kütahya, Center, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06029517
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Buffalo, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04058990
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT03273023
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
View Trial Details