Erevna Innovations Inc.
Montreal, Quebec, H3Z 1C3, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07202117
Skin ageing is intricately linked to collagen degradation caused by internal and external factors. External factors contributing to ageing include ultraviolet rays, smoking, heat, and air pollution, and follow a distribution across the body according to the level of exposure. Whereas internal ageing occurs as a natural consequence of physiological changes over time. As we age, both natural internal and external factors cause stress to the body. This stress damages important molecules in our skin, including proteins, fats (lipids), and DNA. One of the main proteins affected is collagen, which gives skin its strength and firmness. This loss of collagen leads to visible signs of aging such as wrinkles, thinner skin (atrophy), rough or damaged texture (elastosis), and uneven skin tone (dyschromia).
Interventions such as collagen stimulators have shown promising outcomes in stimulating cells to produce collagen, thereby improving skin elasticity and firmness. Poly-L-Lactic Acid is a biodegradable long-chain polymer of repeating units of lactic acid derived from alpha-hydroxy acid. Injecting PLLA into the deep dermis or subcutaneous tissue, stimulates collagen production through an inflammatory response, resulting in skin rejuvenation that can last between two to three years. In contrast, CaHA-R drives the regeneration of collagens, elastin, and proteoglycans with minimal immune cell recruitment and immediate volume improvement lasting around 12-18 months. To date, there have been no randomized-controlled-trials comparing the efficacy of PLLA vs CaHa-R for skin rejuvenation in the face and body.
Interested in participating?
Request Info21 year and older
Female
Interventional
Phase 4
Montreal, Quebec, H3Z 1C3, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Acceptable forms of effective birth control include:
Exclusion criteria
Sculptra® Aesthetic is manufactured by Galderma Laboratories. It is a sterile, lyophilized preparation of PLLA that is biocompatible and biodegradable. Each vial contains 367.5 mg of freeze-dried powder, including 150 mg of PLLA. Prior to injection, it will be reconstituted with sterile water for injection (SWFI) and lidocaine hydrochloride (2%).
For this study, commercial products will be used. The study products are for single use only.
Radiesse® is manufactured by Merz Aesthetics. It is a sterile, non-pyrogenic, semi-solid injectable implant composed of synthetic CaHA suspended in a gel carrier of sterile water, glycerin, and sodium carboxymethylcellulose. Each pre-filled syringe contains 1.5 mL of product. The product includes 0.3% lidocaine for pain reduction during injection.
For this study, commercial products will be used. The study products are for single use only.
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1) to Week 40 (Visit 6)
Change in skin elasticity parameters (net elasticity, gross elasticity, distensibility, and maximum recovery) will be measured using the Cutometer Dual MPA 580 on the cheek and décolleté.
Time frame: Week 20 (Visit 4), Week 30 (Visit 5), and Week 40 (Visit 6)
Participant satisfaction will be assessed using a 7-point Likert scale questionnaire rating satisfaction with skin appearance after treatment (from "Very Dissatisfied" to "Very Satisfied"). Scores will be compared between groups.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 20 (Visit 4), Week 30 (Visit 5), Week 40 (Visit 6)
Blinded evaluators will assess aesthetic improvement using the GAIS. The percentage of participants rated as at least "Improved" ("Improved", "Much Improved", or "Very Much Improved") compared to Baseline will be compared between groups
Time frame: Baseline, Week 20 (Visit 4), Week 30 (Visit 5), and Week 40 (Visit 6)
Facial and décolleté laxity will be rated using the 10-class Facial Laxity Rating (FLR) scale and the 5-point Galderma Decolletage Scale (GDS), assessed by a blinded evaluator.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 40 (Visit 6)
Total volume of PLLA or CaHA-R used for each participant will be recorded to assess correlation with clinical outcomes and biophysical skin parameter changes.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 20 (Visit 4), Week 30 (Visit 5), and Week 40 (Visit 6)
Changes in hydration will be measured using the Corneometer CM 825 probe on the cheek and décolleté regions at baseline and at all visits following treatments, comparison may be made between groups
Time frame: Baseline, Week 20 (Visit 4), Week 30 (Visit 5), and Week 40 (Visit 6)
Changes in TEWL will be measured using the Tewameter TM 210 to evaluate barrier function improvement, comparison may be made between groups
Time frame: Baseline, Week 20 (Visit 4), Week 30 (Visit 5), and Week 40 (Visit 6)
Change in SELS will be analyzed via VisioScan VC 98 to measure skin roughness, smoothness, scaliness, desquamation, pore size, and wrinkle patterns, comparisons may be made between groups
Time frame: Baseline, Week 20 (Visit 4), Week 30 (Visit 5), and Week 40 (Visit 6)
Changes in skin thickness (dermis and hypodermis) will be measured using ultra-high-frequency ultrasound (Clarius L20) to quantify biostimulatory effects of each treatment, comparison may be made between groups.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 40
Volumetric changes will be measured using 3D imaging (Canfield Scientific) to assess lifting and contouring effects. Correlation with product volume will be evaluated if applicable. Comparison between volume of product used may be compared between products
Time frame: Baseline to Week 40
Lift will be assessed using vector shift analysis on 3D images. Correlation with volume used will be explored. Comparison between volume of product and lift may be compared between products
Time frame: Baseline, Week 20 (Visit 4), Week 30 (Visit 5), and Week 40 (Visit 6)
Quantitative changes in skin laxity will be measured using digital calipers (MENTOR® MemoryGel™ Xtra).
Time frame: Baseline to Week 40
Safety will be assessed based on:
Participant-reported adverse events (via take-home diaries) Physician-reported adverse events (at all study visits) Incidence, severity, and relation to treatment will be documented and compared between groups.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 20 (Visit 4), and Week 40 (Visit 6)
In consenting participants (n ≥ 15), bilateral retro-auricular biopsies will be analyzed with various stains (Masson's Trichrome, Picrosirius Red, etc.) for:
Neocollagenesis, neovascularization, and neoelastinogenesis Dermal thickness Inflammatory response, fibrosis, or foreign body reaction Presence of procollagen, fibroblasts, eosinophils, proteoglycans, glycoproteins, hyaluronic acid
Analysis may include comparison between products following administration of all three treatments
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Erevna Innovations Inc.
Other
Comparing Outcomes of Collagen Biostimulatory Agents: A Randomized, Patient and Evaluator-blinded Clinical Trial Evaluating Poly-L-lactic Acid and Calcium Hydroxyapatite for Rejuvenation of the Face and Body
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07368686
Aesthetic
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07383766
Aesthetic
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07210190
Aesthetic
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07193199
Aesthetic
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial Details