Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06621771

Playing Piano to Improve Hand Function Early After Stroke

The goal of this clinical trial is to study the feasibility of a 6-week piano playing training intervention in a subacute stroke population. More specifically, the investigators aim to (1) implement and test the feasibility of the intervention in the subacute stroke rehabilitation program; and (2) explore the acceptability of the supervised training sessions and home practice sessions. Researchers will also (3) estimate and contrast the effects of the piano training intervention as compared to conventional therapy on manual dexterity, coordination, functional use of the upper extremity, attention and mood.

Therapy specifically provided as part of this project will be delivered above and beyond usual therapy time in both intervention groups. Participants of the piano group will:

* Engage in a step-by-step musical training consisting of two supervised, individual 45-min sessions per week for 6 consecutive weeks, for a total of 12 sessions. * The supervised session will also be complemented with a biweekly home program (15 minutes) consisting of piano exercises.

Participants in the conventional group will:

* Engage in two individual 45-min sessions per week for 6 consecutive weeks consisting in conventional occupational therapy treatment. * They will also receive a biweekly home program consisting in occupational therapy exercises (15 minutes).

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

40 year–74 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

Piano Training: Musical pieces are designed to involve all 5 digits of the paretic hand. Whether played with the right or left hand, they involve the same number of finger repetitions as well as similar finger sequences and melodic patterns. A Musical Instrument Digital Interface (MIDI) piano program called Synthesia will be used to display musical pieces on a computer screen that is adapted for people with no music reading abilities. Participants will be cued to press a sequence of key presses required to produce a melody by a visual display showing a blue dot falling from the upper part of the screen down to indicate the correct key on a virtual keyboard. After each cue, the program will pause until the participant pressed the correct key before moving on. During the supervised training sessions, participants will play on a touch sensitive piano keyboard. A computer will record the responses from the piano keyboard and provided a final score indicating the number of errors and total duration for each musical piece. A professional therapist will be present during these supervised sessions and will provide verbal feedback on the quality of movement and discouraged compensatory strategies. Nine musical pieces will be introduced to the participants in an order of increasing difficulty: level 1 involving movements of consecutive fingers (e.g.,1-2-3-4-5); level 2 involving third, fourth, and fifth intervals or movements of non-consecutive fingers (e.g., 1-3-5-1-4); and level 3 involving chords, that is 2 fingers played at the same time. Within each level, 3 musical pieces involving an increasing number of key presses and changes in melodic direction will be introduced. The speed of execution or tempo will also increase within each musical piece.

Conventional Intervention: Conventional sessions will consist of usual occupational therapy treatment (e.g., mobility, ADL, IALD, information session), excluding treatments focusing specifically on arm and hand motor recovery. The nature therapy provided as part of the conventional intervention will be carefully documents in the chart.

Home Practice: All participants in the piano group will receive an unsupervised home program consisting of piano sequence exercises comprising short excerpts of the same musical pieces practiced during the supervised sessions and they will receive a roll-up flexible piano. Participants in the conventional group will receive assignments related to occupational therapy exercises and/or IALD/ADLs. All participants will report on their practice duration and content in a logbook after each practice session.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Have normal/corrected visual and auditory acuity
  • Present a first-ever supratentorial unilateral stroke (1-24 weeks post-stroke)
  • Present some capacity of dissociation of arm and finger movements, as reflected by scores of 3 to 6 on the arm and hand components of the Chedoke McMaster Stroke Assessment
  • Have the capacity to follow simple instructions
  • Have no professional piano experience (only for the piano group)

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of visual field defect, hemineglect as well as dementia or moderate-to-severe cognitive deficits (score less than 18 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment).

Treatment and study plan

Music intervention

Other

Participants will engage in a step-by-step piano training consisting in playing piano pieces designed to involve all 5 digits of the paretic hand and increasing in complexity. They will be using a Musical Instrument Digital Interface (MIDI) piano program called Synthesia to display musical pieces on a computer screen that is adapted for people with no music reading abilities and will be playing on a touch sensitive piano keyboard. The supervised session will also be complemented with a unsupervised home program consisting of piano sequence exercises comprising short excerpts of the same musical pieces practiced during the supervised sessions and they will receive a roll-up flexible piano

Occupational Therapy

Other

Participants will receive conventional occupational therapy treatment (e.g., mobility, ADL, IALD, information session), excluding treatments focusing specifically on arm and hand motor recovery.The supervised session will also be complemented with an unsupervised home program consisting of assignments related to occupational therapy exercises and/or IALD/ADLs.

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility: Characteristics of stroke participants

    Time frame: Pre-intervention (week0)

    Collected via chart review (e.g. CPA vs. outpatient program, age, sex/gender, stroke characteristics, upper extremity function level, cognitive function)

  2. Feasibility: Number of eligible vs. referred participants

    Time frame: Post-intervention (week6)

    Assessed using the number of participants referred to the study in comparison to the list of admitted patients in the targeted stroke programs.

  3. Feasibility: adherence to intervention - number of completed sessions

    Time frame: Post-intervention (week6)

    Training logbook filled by researchers/clinicians (supervised sessions) and subjects (unsupervised sessions).

  4. Feasibility: adherence to intervention - number of piano pieces completed (piano group) vs occupational therapy exercises completed (conventional group)

    Time frame: Post-intervention (week6)

    Training logbook filled by researchers/clinicians (supervised sessions) and subjects (unsupervised sessions).

  5. Feasibility: adherence to intervention - number of home practice sessions

    Time frame: Post-intervention (week6)

    Training logbook filled by researchers/clinicians (supervised sessions) and subjects (unsupervised sessions).

  6. Feasibility: adherence to intervention - time of home practice sessions

    Time frame: Post-intervention (week6)

    Training logbook filled by researchers/clinicians (supervised sessions) and subjects (unsupervised sessions).

  7. Feasibility: presence of adverse or undesirable effects during the intervention

    Time frame: Post-Intervention (week6)

    Collected with open-ended questions.

  8. Acceptability of the intervention

    Time frame: Post-intervention (week6)

    Participant's comments and observations collected using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) Questionnaire, which considers different dimensions such as affective attitude, perceived effectiveness, ethicality and opportunity cost. It comprises 8 items rated from 1 to 5. Minimum value is 8 and maximum value is 40. A higher score is associated with better outcomes.

  9. Acceptability: Overall experience

    Time frame: Post-intervention (week6)

    Investigated through open-ended questions

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in the Box and Block test at Post-intervention

    Time frame: Post-intervention (week6) and Follow-up (week12)

    Assess gross manual dexterity

  2. Change from Baseline in the Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT) at Post-intervention

    Time frame: Post-intervention (week6) and Follow-up (week12)

    Assesses fine manual dexterity

  3. Change from Baseline in the Finger to Nose test at Post-intervention

    Time frame: Post-Intervention (week6) and Follow-up (week12)

    Assesses arm movement coordination.

  4. Change from Baseline in the Finger Tapping test at Post-intervention

    Time frame: Post-intervention (week6) and Follow-up (week12)

    Assesses finger movement coordination.

  5. Change from Baseline in the 6-items Jebsen Hand Function test at Post-intervention

    Time frame: Post-intervention (week6) and Follow-up (week12)

    Assesses functional use of the upper extremity.

  6. Change from Baseline in the Digit Span Test - Forward at Post-intervention

    Time frame: Post-intervention (week6) and Follow-up (week12)

    A subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) that assesses attention, more specifically auditory recall and working memory. Score is calculates as the longest number of forward sequential digits that can accurately be remembered. The maximum score is 16. A higher score is associated with better outcomes.

  7. Change from Baseline in the Digit Span Test - Backward at Post-intervention

    Time frame: Post-intervention (week6) and Follow-up (week12)

    A subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) that assesses attention, more specifically auditory recall and working memory. Score is calculates as the longest number of backward sequential digits that can accurately be remembered. The maximum score is 16. A higher score is associated with better outcomes.

  8. Change from Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at Post-intervention

    Time frame: Post-intervention (week6) and Follow-up (week12)

    A self-administered test assessing mood, more specifically screening for depression and anxiety. It comprises 14 items rated from 0 to 3. Seven questions relate to anxiety and seven to depression, giving two scores (maximum score for each = 21). A higher score is associated with worse outcomes.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Anouk Lamontagne, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

450-688-9550 ext. 84168

Myriam Villeneuve, Mec

CONTACT

[email protected]

514-216-1295

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

McGill University

Other

Collaborators

  • Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

A Piano Training Program to Improve Manual Dexterity and Upper Extremity Function in Subacute Stroke Survivors

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2026
First posted
Oct 1, 2024
Registry last updated
Nov 21, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.