Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01038713

Plastic vs. Covered Metal vs. Uncovered Metal Biliary Stents for the Management of Malignant Biliary Obstruction

This is a single center, randomized, unblinded study to compare the rate of occlusion of plastic, uncovered metal, or fully covered metal biliary stents in patient's with surgically resectable disease or those undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. We will also compare occlusion rates between uncovered metal and fully covered metal biliary stents in those patients determined to have surgically unresectable disease.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756, United States

About this study

Malignant biliary obstruction can result from extrinsic processes, such as proximal pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or metastatic lesions, or from intrinsic lesions such as cholangiocarcinoma. Malignant biliary obstruction is typically treated endoscopically with placement of either plastic (polyethylene) or metal biliary stents. Metal stents have a wider diameter than plastic stents, and have been shown to have higher patency rates, but are also 15-40 times the cost of plastic stents. Metal stents with a polymer coating have been developed to prevent tumor ingrowth into the stent, which can lead to stent occlusion. Cost analysis has demonstrated an advantage to the use of metal stents in patients with unresectable disease, or who may achieve operable status following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while either plastic stents or metal stents are used when patients are deemed to have a surgically resectable lesion. Patient's determined to have resectable, or borderline resectable malignancy (those who may achieve resectability status following neoadjuvant chemotherapy) will receive either plastic, uncovered metal, or covered metal stents in a randomized fashion, while patients determined to have surgically unresectable malignancy will randomly receive either covered or uncovered metal biliary stents. The primary aim of this study is to prospectively evaluate stent occlusion rates in patients presenting with malignant biliary obstruction. Secondary aims of the study will include a cost analysis of each stent type, rate of hospital admission following stent placement, days off of chemotherapy due to procedural complication, and rate of acute cholecystitis associated with stent placement.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female older than 18
  • Capable of providing written informed consent
  • Presenting with malignant biliary obstruction requiring biliary drainage either from proximal pancreatic malignancy, metastatic disease, or intrinsic biliary malignancy. The patient must have an established diagnosis of underlying malignancy, and surgical resectability status established, prior to enrollment in this study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability to undergo conscious sedation or monitored anesthesia
  • Prior pancreatico-biliary surgery
  • Evidence of acute cholecystitis at time of endoscopic procedure
  • Intraluminal filling defect requiring endoscopic removal prior to stent placement
  • Inability to provide written informed consent
  • Malignancy not verified prior to stent placement

Treatment and study plan

Biliary stent placement

Device

Patient's with a malignant biliary obstruction will undergo placement of a biliary stent via ERCP.

Primary outcomes

  1. Assess the Occlusion Rates, Attempted Surgical Resection or Death of Plastic, Covered, and Uncovered Biliary Stents in Patients Presenting With Malignant Biliary Obstruction.

    Time frame: Time of stent occlusion, attempted surgical resection or patient death to 300 days

    Number of participants who developed stent occlusion, attempted surgical resection or death following stent placement

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total Cost Associated With the Placement of Biliary Stents Including the Cost of the Device as Well as the Secondary Costs of Device Placement.

    Time frame: Costs measured up to 500 days

  2. Determine the Days of Hospitalization Following Stent Placement

    Time frame: From stent placement up to 500 days post stent

    Number of total days of hospitalization for all patients in each group

  3. Assess Days Neoadjuvant Therapy Was Delayed Due to Complications Associated With the Stents

    Time frame: Time from stent placement to 500 days

    Total number of days in which neoadjuvant therapy was delayed due to stent related issues

  4. Assess Rate of Acute Cholecystitis Associated With Each Type of Stent

    Time frame: time from stent placement to 500 days

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Plastic vs. Covered Metal vs. Uncovered Metal Biliary Stents for the Management of Malignant Biliary Obstruction

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Dec 24, 2009
Registry last updated
Jun 23, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.