CPtcube, CPTpatch
DeviceThis study investigates the effectiveness of a system for reproducible application of cold plasma on larger areas and observes the effect of a 4-week additional plasma treatment on wound healing of large chronic wounds.
NCT Number: NCT05855499
Every year, 5 million people throughout Germany suffer from extensive, often chronic wounds. Cold plasma is an innovative therapeutic approach in the treatment of these persistent tissue defects. However, previous therapy options with cold plasma are very time-consuming, especially with increasing wound area, and are also strongly dependent on the skill of the practitioner.
This study investigates the effectiveness of a system for reproducible application of cold plasma on larger areas and observes the effect of a 4-week additional plasma treatment on wound healing of large chronic wounds. The patient-related benefit of such an additional treatment will also be evaluated. Both study arms will receive guideline-based wound therapy, which is the current gold standard.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
The clinical trial investigates the efficacy of an additional 4-week initial plasma therapy (CAPT) in direct comparison to standard guideline-based wound therapy (SWT) alone. The reactivation of healing of chronic, non-healing wounds will be assessed. This reactivation is primarily measured by the reduction of wound area, a valid and clinically accepted parameter for wound healing. A large number of RCTs and cohort studies demonstrate a strong correlation between the reduction in wound area at 4 weeks and the therapy outcome at 12 and 20 weeks.
In addition to wound area reduction, other clinical parameters such as wound volume, wound closure, percentage of necrotic and fibrotic tissue, percentage of granulation tissue, wound exudate, and microflora are recorded. By recording these secondary endpoints, it is possible to closely track and analyse changes in wound condition induced by cold plasma.
Another focus of the clinical trial is the evaluation of patient-related outcomes such as frequency of occurrence of infections, perception of pain, occurrence of adverse events, frequency of hospitalization, and change in quality of life. These events are fully documented to evaluate the safety of the treatment and to rule out potential risks.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria
are divided into patient-specific and wound-specific criteria.
Patient Criteria:
Wound Criteria:
Exclusion criteria
The exclusion criteria are divided into patient-specific and wound-specific criteria.
Patient Criteria:
Wound Criteria:
This study investigates the effectiveness of a system for reproducible application of cold plasma on larger areas and observes the effect of a 4-week additional plasma treatment on wound healing of large chronic wounds.
Time frame: 3 visits weekly for 4 weeks, follow-up at at 12 and 20 weeks
The clinical trial is based on the following primary null hypothesis (H0):
There is no significant difference in terms of reduction in area of chronic wounds between standard guideline-based wound therapy with and without initial 4-week plasma treatment.
The associated alternative hypothesis (HA) is:
There is a significant difference in terms of reduction in area of chronic wounds between standard guideline-based wound therapy with and without initial 4 weeks of plasma treatment
Time frame: during the 4-week active treatment phase, after 3 and after 6 months
Number of patients with wound closures achieved during the 4-week active treatment phase or in the period after the active treatment phase (3 or 6 months after last visit).
Time frame: during the 6-month observation period
Change in wound pain during activity or at rest during the 6-month observation period. Pain was assessed using an NRS with values ranging from 0 to 10.
Time frame: during the 6-month observation period
Change in quality of life, assessed using a wound-specific questionnaire (Wound-QoL) and a generic quality-of-life questionnaire (SF-12), at the end of the treatment phase, at wound closure, at early treatment discontinuation, and during the two FU time points, each compared with the start of treatment.
Time frame: during the 4-week active treatment phase
For this purpose, swabs are taken before and after treatment. The swabs are then examined in the laboratory with regard to the microflora (germ type and resistance).
Coldplasmatech
Industry
Plasma On Chronic Wounds for Epidermal Regeneration - Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Investigate the Efficacy of Plasma Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic, Non-healing Wounds in Comparison to Standard Wound Therapy -
Acronym: POWER
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06878482
Blood Circulation, Botulinum Toxins, Type A
Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT02045303
Chronic Ulcer of Lower Extremity, Wounds and Injuries
Dallas, Texas, United States
View Trial Details