Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07325474

Plan and Protect: Safety Planning for Teens in Rural Emergency Departments

The goal of this observational study is to determine whether implementing a culturally sensitive, tablet-based safety planning program called Plan & Protect (P&P) within rural emergency departments can improve home safety and reduce suicide risk in adolescents presenting with suicidality.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Will implementing P&P increase caregiver-reported home safety (reduce access to firearms and unsafe medication storage) for adolescents 12-17 years old presenting to rural EDs with suicidal ideation, self-harm, or mental health crisis? * Will implementing P&P decrease adolescent-reported perceived suicide risk and related outcomes (e.g., suicide events, and attendance at follow-up mental healthcare)?

Researchers will compare outcomes for adolescents and caregivers receiving P&P (implemented as the new standard of care at sites during the intervention periods) to those receiving usual care (prior to P&P implementation at those hospitals) to see if P&P increases home safety and decreases suicide risk and related healthcare utilization.

Participants will, if clinically appropriate:

* Complete the tablet-based P&P modules during their ED visit * Complete self-report measures at baseline, ~30 days, and ~3 months post-discharge * A subset will also participate in semi-structured interviews

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

12 year–17 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Cheshire Medical Center, Keene, New Hampshire, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

One-in-five children and adolescents in the United States (US) live in rural areas where they are more likely to live in poverty, have neurodevelopmental, behavioral and mental health conditions, and die during childhood than their urban-residing peers. Suicide is a leading cause of childhood mortality, and rural-residing youth are two times more likely to die from suicide than urban-residing youth. Nearly half of children and adolescents with mental health conditions do not receive treatment, and those in rural areas face unique barriers to care due to geographic isolation, stigma, and shortages of pediatric services and clinicians. Given barriers to community-based mental healthcare, youth with suicidal ideation and/or suicide attempt (hereafter "suicidality") increasingly present to emergency departments (EDs) for care. However, most clinicians practicing in rural EDs are under-prepared and under-resourced to care for this population.

In order to fill this gap, this project aims to improve home safety and decrease suicide risk in youth 12-17 years of age who present to rural EDs with suicidal ideation or attempt, leveraging community-based participatory research approaches and technology to implement, with high fidelity, culturally-sensitive and nationally recommended safety planning procedures. To achieve this goal, we will integrate P&P, a culturally sensitive, tablet-based safety planning program as a quality improvement intervention at 4 hospitals in the Dartmouth Health network using a hospital-randomized stepped wedge design and will evaluate the program using a type 1 hybrid implementation-effectiveness design.

Aim: To determine the effectiveness of P&P compared to usual care for youth with suicidality and their caregivers to increase home safety and decrease suicide risk; evaluate the extent to which these outcomes are mediated by caregiver and youth self-efficacy and expectations of suicide risk; and assess the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of P&P using a mixed methods approach.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

for children:

  • 12-17 years of age (and their parent/caregiver(s))
  • Ability to speak and complete surveys in English
  • History of emergency department visit for suicidality, self-harm or mental health crisis
  • Medically stable

Exclusion criteria

for children:

  • Cognitive or developmental delays that preclude program participation based on clinical team assessment
  • Diagnosis of psychosis
  • Primary diagnosis of an eating disorder
  • Parent/guardian not able to provide consent in English
  • Clinical team concern for patient or staff safety based upon active behavioral concerns
  • Parent/guardian not available to provide consent (e.g youth is in child protective custody/ward of the state)

Inclusion criteria

for parents/caregivers:

  • Parent or caregiver of an eligible child
  • 18 years old or older
  • Ability to speak and complete surveys in English

Exclusion criteria

for parents/caregivers:

-Inability to understand key aspects of the study

Treatment and study plan

Plan & Protect safety planning intervention

Behavioral

Plan and Protect (P&P) is a tablet-based, family-centered quality improvement program targeted to rural Northern New England that combines a youth-facing safety-planning module with a caregiver-facing home safety decision aid and youth safety information. The goal is to help adolescents and their caregivers develop concrete, culturally-sensitive safety plans during emergency department visits.

Care as usual

Behavioral

Adolescents and caregivers will receive treatment as usual at the Emergency Department.

Primary outcomes

  1. Improved home safety (parent and youth)

    Time frame: 30 and 90 days after ED visit

    Reduced access to firearms and medications at home. This will be collected with five questions about presence of medications and firearms at home, if they are stored unlocked, and if firearms are loaded. We will measure improvement in safety across the time frame.

  2. Concise Health Risk Tracking 9-item measure (youth)

    Time frame: 30 and 90 days after ED visit

    The Concise Health Risk Tracking (CHRT) is a 9-item survey that assesses suicidal thoughts and behaviors in the past week, with response options ranging 0-4. Total scores range 0-36, with higher scores indicating more severe suicidality.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Suicide Events (youth)

    Time frame: 30 and 90 days after ED visit

    Four self-reported questions from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey focus on suicidal ideation, attempts, and attempt severity, augmented by electronic health record review for emergency room and hospital visits for suicide ideation and/or attempt and/or death.

  2. Youth Mental Health Care Utilization (parent and youth)

    Time frame: 30 and 90 days following ED visit

    Any mental or emotional health care received after their emergency department visit using a checklist adapted from nationally administered healthcare utilization surveys. Response categories (primary care, mental health provider, outpatient/urgent care, emergency department, school based care) were derived from health service use domains captured in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

  3. Reduced Access to Firearms at Home (parent and youth)

    Time frame: 30 and 90 days after ED visit

    Improved home safety with respect to firearm access. This will be collected with three questions about presence of firearms at home, if they are stored unlocked, and if they are loaded. We will measure improvement in safety across the time frame.

  4. Reduced Access to Medications at Home (parent and youth)

    Time frame: 30 and 90 days after ED visit

    Improved home safety with safer storage of medications. This will be collected with two questions about presence of medications at home and if they are stored unlocked. We will measure improvement in safety across the time frame.

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Efficacy to Cope with Suicidal Thoughts and Urges Scale (primary target mechanism)

    Time frame: 30 and 90 days after ED visit

    The Efficacy to Cope with Suicidal Thoughts and Urges Scale was designed to measure children's abilities to manage suicide-related thoughts and impulses. It contains 10 coping skills and children rate their confidence in their ability to use each coping skill to manage their suicidality. Responses range from 0 to 10 with 0 = Not at all confident, 5 = Somewhat confident, and 10 = Extremely confident.

  2. Change in Parental Perceptions of Teen Suicide Risk (secondary target mechanism)

    Time frame: 30 and 90 days after ED visit

    This 3-item measure looks at parental understanding of their teen's suicide risk. Answer choices range from 0 (not at all confident) to 10 (completely confident), with an anchor of 5 (somewhat confident).

  3. Change in Patient Perceptions of Their Own Suicide Risk (secondary target mechanism)

    Time frame: 30 and 90 days after ED visit

    This 3-item self-report measure examines how at risk a patient believes they are. It is scored on a 5-point Likert from 0-4 where higher = greater perceived risk and has a total possible score of 15.

  4. Change in Parental Self-Efficacy to Support Teens During a Suicidal Crisis (secondary target mechanism)

    Time frame: 30 and 90 days after ED visit

    This 9-item scale measures parent confidence regarding their ability to engage in activities to prevent or assist their child in managing a suicidal crisis. Answer choices range from 0 (not at all confident) to 10 (completely confident), with an anchor of 5 (somewhat confident).

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jacqueline Pogue, MPH

CONTACT

[email protected]

603-646-5614

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
  • Trustees of Dartmouth College

Registry information

Official study title

Development & Implementation of Culturally Sensitive Safety Planning to Reduce Suicide Risk in Adolescents Seeking Care in Rural Emergency Departments

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jan 8, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 27, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.