Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07515183

Placebo Effect of Immediate Kinesio Taping on Upper Extremity Performance in Healthy Adults

This study investigates whether Kinesio Taping has immediate effects on upper extremity performance in healthy adults and whether these effects may be influenced by placebo mechanisms. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups: therapeutic Kinesio Taping, sham Kinesio Taping, or no intervention.

All participants complete tests of hand function, including grip strength, typing performance, reaction time, and manual dexterity, before and after a short standardized waiting period. Participants also rate their perceived performance, comfort, and overall change.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the immediate effects of therapeutic Kinesio Taping on objective upper extremity motor performance and perceived function in healthy adults, and to determine whether perceived improvements correspond to measurable changes in motor performance.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–30 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Istinye University Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Application and Research Center (ISUFIZYOTEM)

Istanbul, 34010, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

This study is a single-blind, three-arm randomized controlled trial designed to investigate the immediate effects of Kinesio Taping on upper extremity motor performance and perceived function in healthy adults and to compare therapeutic Kinesio Taping with sham Kinesio Taping and a no-intervention control condition.. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups: therapeutic Kinesio Taping applied with tension, sham Kinesio Taping applied without tension, or a no-intervention control condition.

The intervention targets the wrist extensor musculature of the dominant upper extremity. Both taping conditions follow the same application procedure and positioning, differing only in the level of tension to isolate the mechanical versus perceptual effects of the tape. The control group follows the same testing timeline without receiving any intervention.

Outcome measures are collected at baseline and immediately after a standardized 20-minute waiting period. Objective measures include maximal grip strength, typing performance, choice reaction time, and manual dexterity. Subjective measures include perceived performance, task ease, comfort, and global rating of change.

The study is conducted in a controlled and standardized testing environment with consistent equipment, procedures, and instructions across participants. This design enables comparison of both objective upper extremity motor performance and patient-reported outcomes among the therapeutic Kinesio Taping, sham Kinesio Taping, and no-intervention control groups.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Being healthy adult between 18-40 years
  • No current pain or injury in the dominant upper extremity
  • No history of chronic musculoskeletal conditions affecting the upper extremity
  • Ability to read, understand, and provide informed consent
  • Regular use of a standard keyboard and mouse, with a minimum self-reported typing frequency of ≥5 hours per week, ensuring familiarity with digital typing tasks and adequate baseline fine motor coordination.

Exclusion criteria

  • Respiratory, neurological, or cardiovascular disorders
  • History of surgery or fracture in the dominant upper extremity within the last six months
  • Known allergy or skin sensitivity to adhesives or Kinesio Tape materials
  • Current use of medications affecting physical performance or sensation
  • Participation in ongoing physical therapy or rehabilitation
  • Diagnosed cognitive impairment or visual deficits that could affect typing or reaction-time performance
  • Engagement in high-level upper extremity sports (>10 hours/week) that could bias grip or typing performance

Treatment and study plan

Kinesio taping

Device

Elastic therapeutic tape applied to the wrist extensor muscles of the dominant upper extremity using approximately 25% tension according to a standardized application protocol.

Sham Kinesio Taping

Device

Elastic tape applied to the wrist extensor muscles of the dominant upper extremity without tension, using the same placement and procedure as the therapeutic intervention to mimic sensory and procedural aspects without intended therapeutic effect.

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximal Grip Strength

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention (within 2-3 minutes after a 20-minute waiting period)

    Maximal grip strength of the dominant hand measured in kilograms using a digital hand dynamometer. The highest value from three trials is recorded.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Typing Performance (Corrected Words Per Minute) and Accuracy

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention

    Typing speed measured using a standardized computer-based typing task; corrected words per minute calculated by accounting for errors And Typing accuracy measured as the percentage of correct entries during a standardized typing task.

  2. Choice Reaction Time

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention

    Reaction time measured in milliseconds using a computer-based Go/No-Go task, calculated as the mean response time for correct trials.

  3. Manual Dexterity (Nine-Hole Peg Test)

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention

    Fine motor dexterity assessed using the Nine-Hole Peg Test; fastest completion time recorded in seconds.

  4. Perceived Performance Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Time frame: Immediately post-intervention

    Self-reported perceived performance measured using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no perceived improvement and 100 indicates maximum perceived improvement. Higher scores indicate better perceived performance.

  5. Task Ease Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Time frame: Immediately post-intervention

    Self-reported task ease measured using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates much harder, 50 indicates no change, and 100 indicates much easier. Higher scores indicate greater perceived ease of task performance.

  6. Comfort Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Time frame: Immediately post-intervention

    Self-reported comfort measured using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates extremely uncomfortable and 100 indicates extremely comfortable. Higher scores indicate greater comfort.

  7. Global Rating of Change (GRC)

    Time frame: Immediately post-intervention

    Participant-reported overall perceived change measured using a 15-point Global Rating of Change (GRC) scale ranging from -7 (vastly worse) to 0 (no change) to +7 (vastly better). Higher scores indicate greater perceived improvement.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Istinye University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Immediate Effects of Kinesio Taping on Upper Extremity Motor Performance and Perceived Function in Healthy Adults: A Sham-controlled Randomized Study

Acronym: KT-PLACEBO

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Apr 7, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 15, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.