Aspiration Therapy (AspireAssist)
DeviceUse of the AspireAssist device in aspiration therapy
Other names: AspireAssist Aspiration Therapy System
NCT Number: NCT01766037
This research study is being performed to find out if a new device, AspireAssist Aspiration Therapy System, can help people with obesity to lose weight without causing too many side effects.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Dept VA San Diego Health Care System, San Diego, California, United States
The Aspiration process works by "correcting" meal portions after eating by removing some of the food left in your stomach 20 minutes after your meal, which reduces the number of calories absorbed by your body. This is done through a tube placed through the abdomen into the stomach with a small valve attached at the surface of your skin. An aspiration system will attach to that valve after each major meal of the day and allow you to remove a portion of that meal.
During this study you will also be provided with Lifestyle therapy which includes behavioral therapy, diet and physical activity education. This Lifestyle therapy will also be provided to the participants who do not receive the AspireAssist so that the two groups can be compared and the benefit of aspiration for weight loss can be determined.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Class III: patients with marked limitation of activity and who are comfortable only at rest Class IV: patients who should be at complete rest, confined to bed or chair and who have discomfort with any physical activity
Use of the AspireAssist device in aspiration therapy
Other names: AspireAssist Aspiration Therapy System
Lifestyle therapy is a behavioral, diet and physical activity education program
Other names: Lifestyle Behavioral Therapy
Time frame: 52 weeks
The first effectiveness co-primary endpoint is the mean percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 52-weeks. The hypothesis for the first primary effectiveness endpoint is that the difference in the mean percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 52-weeks for the Aspiration Therapy (AT) group and Control group is at least 10%. Percent EWL is defined as absolute weight loss divided by baseline excess weight and multiplied by 100. Excess weight is determined from ideal body weights based on a BMI=25 kg/m2.
Time frame: 52 weeks
The second co-primary effectiveness endpoint is that at least 50% of the AT group at 52-weeks achieve > 25% EWL.
Time frame: 52 weeks
i) Mean percent absolute weight loss in AT compared to Control group
Time frame: 52 weeks
ii) proportion of subjects who achieve ≥10% absolute weight loss in AT compared to Control group
Time frame: 52 weeks
iii) mean percent change serum lipids (triglyceride, HDL-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol concentration) in the AT group compared to the control group
Time frame: 52 weeks
iv) mean percent change in systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the AT group compared to the control group
Time frame: 52 weeks
v) "Impact of Weight on Quality of Life" (IWQOL) questionnaire total score
Total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100. Based on the algorithm developed by Crosby, et.al., patients' IWQOLLite total scores are considered to have shown meaningful improvement from baseline to one year if they increased between 7 and 12 points, depending upon baseline severity in comparison to the normative mean. Normative means for the IWQOL-Lite have been derived from a sample of 534 non-obese individuals who were not enrolled in any weight loss treatment program [238 women and 296 men with BMI's between 18.5 and 29.9]. The data presented is the mean change in total score. The AT group demonstrated a mean improvement (increase) in score of 16.3 points, the Control group a mean improvement (increase) of 11.7 points.
Time frame: 52 weeks
vi) change in mean hemoglobin A1C (only subjects with T2 diabetes at baseline). Hemoglobin A1C is measured as DCCT%. The change in mean DCCT% from Baseline to Week 52 is reported for this secondary endpoint.
Time frame: 52 weeks
vii) percent procedural success (defined as successful endoscopic placement of the A-Tube) in all subjects undergoing endoscopy
Time frame: 52 weeks
Percent change in the number of medications taken by subjects for hypertension
Time frame: 52 weeks
Percent change in the number of medications taken by subjects for dyslipidemia
Time frame: 52 weeks
Percent change in the number of medications taken by subjects for Type 2 Diabetes
Time frame: 52 weeks
Percent change in the number of subjects on Hypertension medication
Time frame: 52 weeks
Percent change in the number of subjects on Dyslipidemia medications
Time frame: 52 weeks
Percent change in the number of subjects on Diabetes medication
Time frame: 52 weeks
The incidence of procedure-related, device-related, and therapy-related serious adverse events. Also, the development of adverse eating behaviors will be assessed.
Aspire Bariatrics, Inc.
Industry
Acronym: PATHWAY
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00687115
Body Weight, Body Weight Changes
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05184361
Body Weight, Body Weight Changes
Cruz Quebrada, Lisbon District, Portugal
View Trial DetailsNCT05424081
Body Weight, Body Weight Changes
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05104450
Apnea, Behavior
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial Details